Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • | Bagshot Formation | Bagshot Formation
    3 KB (394 words) - 14:36, 5 May 2015
  • | Bagshot Formation
    1 KB (201 words) - 11:41, 7 December 2015
  • | Near-equivalent to Bagshot Formation | rowspan="6" | Bagshot Formation
    7 KB (949 words) - 11:36, 7 December 2015
  • | Thames Group, comprising London Clay Formation and Bagshot Formation
    4 KB (544 words) - 15:01, 2 March 2018
  • ...as the Thames Group (THAM), which is composed of London Clay Formation and Bagshot Formation.
    3 KB (515 words) - 15:01, 2 March 2018
  • | Bagshot Formation | rowspan="2" | '''Bagshot Formation'''
    10 KB (1,453 words) - 10:00, 10 August 2015
  • ...(G2; Paleocene–Eocene), Harwich Formation (G3), Thames Group (G3) and the Bagshot Formation (G4). In the Hampshire Basin, the Thanet Sand Formation is absent and the s ...sion from the top of the chalk through the Reading Formation, London Clay, Bagshot Formation and Bracklesham Group to the Barton Clay. The Bracklesham Group (up to 140m
    13 KB (2,066 words) - 16:10, 28 July 2015
  • | valign="center" | <span style="color:#ffffff">---</span>Bagshot Formation
    15 KB (2,308 words) - 15:19, 6 February 2017
  • | BAGSHOT FORMATION
    15 KB (1,753 words) - 09:30, 8 March 2016
  • ...the top of the Claygate Member, which is distinguished from the overlying Bagshot Formation by containing finer sand without cross-bedding and in the relative abundanc ...sand unit above the Claygate Member and below the basal gravel bed of the Bagshot Formation (or Virginia Water Formation of King, 1981<ref name="King 1981"></ref>). As
    230 KB (34,538 words) - 11:23, 29 November 2019