Editing Benjamin Neeve Peach - biographical information
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Your changes will be displayed to readers once an authorised user accepts them. (help) |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Benjamin Neeve Peach - biographical information == | == Benjamin Neeve Peach - biographical information == | ||
Line 48: | Line 43: | ||
| 1926 || Obituary - Benjamin Neeve Peach. Born 6th September 1842, died 29th January 1926. Geologists Magazine. Whole Series. v. 63 p.187-190. 1926 | | 1926 || Obituary - Benjamin Neeve Peach. Born 6th September 1842, died 29th January 1926. Geologists Magazine. Whole Series. v. 63 p.187-190. 1926 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | 1928 || Greenly, Edward, Benjamin Neeve Peach: a study. [Obituary.]. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society. v. 12 p.1-11. 1928 | + | | 1928 || Greenly, Edward., . Benjamin Neeve Peach: a study. [Obituary.]. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society. v. 12 p.1-11. 1928 |
|- | |- | ||
| 1926 || Proceedings Royal Society (1926) (B.C.) | | 1926 || Proceedings Royal Society (1926) (B.C.) | ||
Line 57: | Line 52: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1926 || Geological Magazine (1926) p. 187 | | 1926 || Geological Magazine (1926) p. 187 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | + | == Ben Peach's Scotland, Landscape sketches by a Victorian geologist == | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | == Ben Peach's Scotland, | ||
This text is derived from the booklet written by Angela Anderson and published by the Institute of Geological Sciences, 1970. | This text is derived from the booklet written by Angela Anderson and published by the Institute of Geological Sciences, 1970. | ||
Line 309: | Line 75: | ||
While this is an unnecessarily harsh judgement on Peach and ignores his capacity for meticulous and detailed work (as, for example, his Monograph on Higher Crustacea of 1908) it must be admitted that it was Horne who actually wrote the Memoirs and it is quite possible that Peach, left to himself, would never have written up his work at all! Horne, in fact, was the ideal complement to Peach. He had a logical mind and was a careful, accurate and systematic worker. Though lacking Peach’s imagination he had the capacity to organize the mapping programme and write up the memoirs afterwards. | While this is an unnecessarily harsh judgement on Peach and ignores his capacity for meticulous and detailed work (as, for example, his Monograph on Higher Crustacea of 1908) it must be admitted that it was Horne who actually wrote the Memoirs and it is quite possible that Peach, left to himself, would never have written up his work at all! Horne, in fact, was the ideal complement to Peach. He had a logical mind and was a careful, accurate and systematic worker. Though lacking Peach’s imagination he had the capacity to organize the mapping programme and write up the memoirs afterwards. | ||
− | + | = | |
− | + | == Northwest Highlands === | |
Peach and Horne, who worked together for forty years, first went to the Northwest Highlands, the scene of their most famous work, in 1883. Peach was then forty years old. They were sent by Archibald Geikie to resolve a long standing controversy about the structure of the area. Murchison had believed that the fossiliferous Cambro-Ordovician Durness Limestone passed conformably upwards into the ‘Eastern’ schists of which a large part of the Northern Highlands are formed. Nicol was the main exponent of the opposition and pointed out that the metamorphosed schists must be older than the unmetamorphosed limestones and that the junction was a steep fault. Since it could easily be demonstrated in the field that the junction is almost horizontal, Murchison’s views were held to be correct. In 1883 both Calloway and Lapworth suggested that the junction was a low-angle tectonic thrust, and this idea was now being given serious consideration by Geikie. It was during their first season of field mapping in the region round Durness and Eriboll that Peach recorded the true situation. Instead of the simple conformity which Murchison had suggested, there were gigantic structures of a kind never before encountered in the British Isles. The Eastern (Moine) Schists had been thrust westwards by a series of large-scale low-angled faults over the unmoved foreland rocks of ancient Lewisian gneiss and their cover of Late Precambrian Torridonian sandstone and Cambro-Ordovician limestones. During this process a series of smaller faults (imbricate structures) had been produced en-echelon in the underlying foreland and cover rocks. The thrust zone was eventually traced in the field from Eriboll to Skye. These well exposed structures now seem easily recognizable, but it was perhaps the most spectacular discovery of all time in British geology. By 1884 Murchison’s views on the succession had to be abandoned in view of the rapidly accumulating evidence against them. Peach was somewhat reluctant to overturn Murchison’s theory, for he felt a debt of gratitude to Murchison and greatly respected the old man. | Peach and Horne, who worked together for forty years, first went to the Northwest Highlands, the scene of their most famous work, in 1883. Peach was then forty years old. They were sent by Archibald Geikie to resolve a long standing controversy about the structure of the area. Murchison had believed that the fossiliferous Cambro-Ordovician Durness Limestone passed conformably upwards into the ‘Eastern’ schists of which a large part of the Northern Highlands are formed. Nicol was the main exponent of the opposition and pointed out that the metamorphosed schists must be older than the unmetamorphosed limestones and that the junction was a steep fault. Since it could easily be demonstrated in the field that the junction is almost horizontal, Murchison’s views were held to be correct. In 1883 both Calloway and Lapworth suggested that the junction was a low-angle tectonic thrust, and this idea was now being given serious consideration by Geikie. It was during their first season of field mapping in the region round Durness and Eriboll that Peach recorded the true situation. Instead of the simple conformity which Murchison had suggested, there were gigantic structures of a kind never before encountered in the British Isles. The Eastern (Moine) Schists had been thrust westwards by a series of large-scale low-angled faults over the unmoved foreland rocks of ancient Lewisian gneiss and their cover of Late Precambrian Torridonian sandstone and Cambro-Ordovician limestones. During this process a series of smaller faults (imbricate structures) had been produced en-echelon in the underlying foreland and cover rocks. The thrust zone was eventually traced in the field from Eriboll to Skye. These well exposed structures now seem easily recognizable, but it was perhaps the most spectacular discovery of all time in British geology. By 1884 Murchison’s views on the succession had to be abandoned in view of the rapidly accumulating evidence against them. Peach was somewhat reluctant to overturn Murchison’s theory, for he felt a debt of gratitude to Murchison and greatly respected the old man. | ||
Line 321: | Line 87: | ||
=== Retirement === | === Retirement === | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Peach retired from the Geological Survey in September 1905 after serving for forty-three years. His retirement gave him time to pursue at his leisure a line of research that had always fascinated him since his early days with Huxley at the Royal School of Mines – the technical description and illustration of fossils, and in particular the Scottish Carboniferous crustaceans. Peach was a very competent palaeontologist, a fact that tends to be overshadowed by his more famous Highland work. It was he who identified most of the fossils in the Survey Memoirs, the most notable being the Lower Cambrian tribolite fauna of the Northwest Highlands and it was to be eighty years before they were redescribed. His friend and colleague Edward Greenly records how, even in the euphoric days of the Moine Thrust discovery, Peach had growled, ‘but give me something that has once been alive!’ | Peach retired from the Geological Survey in September 1905 after serving for forty-three years. His retirement gave him time to pursue at his leisure a line of research that had always fascinated him since his early days with Huxley at the Royal School of Mines – the technical description and illustration of fossils, and in particular the Scottish Carboniferous crustaceans. Peach was a very competent palaeontologist, a fact that tends to be overshadowed by his more famous Highland work. It was he who identified most of the fossils in the Survey Memoirs, the most notable being the Lower Cambrian tribolite fauna of the Northwest Highlands and it was to be eighty years before they were redescribed. His friend and colleague Edward Greenly records how, even in the euphoric days of the Moine Thrust discovery, Peach had growled, ‘but give me something that has once been alive!’ | ||
Line 336: | Line 100: | ||
== Ben Peach — a fishy ditty == | == Ben Peach — a fishy ditty == | ||
(Sung at the 1929 Edinburgh Geologists Annual Dinner) | (Sung at the 1929 Edinburgh Geologists Annual Dinner) | ||
− | |||
D’ye ken Ben Peach with his shoulders broad | D’ye ken Ben Peach with his shoulders broad | ||
− | |||
His dimpled cheeks and his smiling nod | His dimpled cheeks and his smiling nod | ||
− | |||
D’ye ken Ben Peach with his reel and his rod | D’ye ken Ben Peach with his reel and his rod | ||
− | |||
As he starts for the loch in the morning. | As he starts for the loch in the morning. | ||
− | + | Chorus | |
− | + | For the whirr of his reel brought the fishes from their bed | |
− | + | And the swish of his line high over his head | |
− | + | As they hurried up in shoals to be all struck dead | |
− | + | By a wave of his wand in the morning. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Yes, I ken Ben Peach and Jock Scott too | Yes, I ken Ben Peach and Jock Scott too | ||
− | |||
The mallard wing and the black Zulu | The mallard wing and the black Zulu | ||
− | |||
You should see Ben Peach on Loch Kylesku | You should see Ben Peach on Loch Kylesku | ||
− | |||
With a shark on his line in the morning. | With a shark on his line in the morning. | ||
− | + | Chorus..... For etc | |
− | |||
− | |||
He lived at Durness for many a day | He lived at Durness for many a day | ||
− | |||
By the big cave of Smoo at Sango Bay | By the big cave of Smoo at Sango Bay | ||
− | |||
And was once nearly slain in a furious fray | And was once nearly slain in a furious fray | ||
− | |||
With a Frenchman at one in the morning. | With a Frenchman at one in the morning. | ||
− | + | Chorus..... For etc | |
− | |||
− | |||
He hunted for old crabs in the Cave of Smoo | He hunted for old crabs in the Cave of Smoo | ||
− | |||
And for beasties long hidden from the public view | And for beasties long hidden from the public view | ||
− | |||
Though pickled well in lime all too hard to stew | Though pickled well in lime all too hard to stew | ||
− | |||
For his breakfast the following morning. | For his breakfast the following morning. | ||
− | + | Chorus..... For etc | |
− | |||
− | |||
He tried camp life on wild Ben More | He tried camp life on wild Ben More | ||
− | |||
But the skies shed tears in a solid steady pour | But the skies shed tears in a solid steady pour | ||
− | |||
So he curled up on the floor, and gave a solemn snore | So he curled up on the floor, and gave a solemn snore | ||
− | |||
Till seventeen o'clock in the morning. | Till seventeen o'clock in the morning. | ||
− | + | Chorus..... For etc | |
− | |||
− | |||
And at last he landed many a degree | And at last he landed many a degree | ||
− | |||
Both an F.R.S. and an LL.D., | Both an F.R.S. and an LL.D., | ||
− | |||
So here’s to the memory of B.N.P., | So here’s to the memory of B.N.P., | ||
− | |||
And the things that he caught in the morning. | And the things that he caught in the morning. | ||
− | + | Chorus..... For etc | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |