Editing Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Your changes will be displayed to readers once an authorised user accepts them. (help) |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 337: | Line 337: | ||
'''Groundwater development potential''' | '''Groundwater development potential''' | ||
− | In the National Master Plan for Rural Supply, Interconsult (1986) classed aquifers | + | In the National Master Plan for Rural Supply, Interconsult (1986) classed aquifers by their Groundwater development potential, as follows: |
− | |||
*High: Suitable for primary supply, piped supplies, and small and large-scale irrigation schemes | *High: Suitable for primary supply, piped supplies, and small and large-scale irrigation schemes | ||
*Moderate: Suitable for primary supplies, small piped schemes and small-scale irrigation schemes | *Moderate: Suitable for primary supplies, small piped schemes and small-scale irrigation schemes | ||
*Low: Suitable for primary supplied from boreholes. | *Low: Suitable for primary supplied from boreholes. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Unconsolidated==== | ====Unconsolidated==== |