Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Removed protection from "Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe")
(51 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Overview of Africa Groundwater Atlas | Africa Groundwater Atlas]] >> [[Hydrogeology by country | Hydrogeology by country]] >> Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe
[[Africa Groundwater Atlas Home | Africa Groundwater Atlas]] >> [[Hydrogeology by country | Hydrogeology by country]] >> Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe


==Authors==
[[File:CC-BY-SA_logo_88x31.png | frame | This work is licensed under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License]]]


'''Daina Mudimbu''', Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
The area of present-day Zimbabwe has been the site of several organised states and kingdoms since the 11th century, as well as a major migration and trade route. It came under colonial British rule in the late 19th century, declaring unilateral independence in 1965. Over the next 15 years there was internal conflict between guerrilla forces and the predominantly white independent Rhodesian government. A 1979 settlement led to elections and the establishment of a biracial democracy, and following formally agreed independence from Britain in 1980, Robert Mugabe was elected head of state. Zimbabwe continued to experience interlinked economic, social and political difficulties, as well as natural pressures such as drought, and has high levels of poverty and poor health, low life expectancy. A particular issue was land redistribution, which after 2000 radically changed land ownership away from the minority white population who owned 70% of the most productive agricultural land, to black farmers. International sanctions in response to government policies has had significant impact on the country. The effective collapse of the economy was one factor leading to the relatively peaceful ousting in 2017 of Robert Mugabe after 37 years.


'''Dr Richard Owen''', Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Minerals (particularly gold but also including platinum and diamonds) are Zimbabwe’s main foreign exports. Although the mining sector is very lucrative, corruption means that much revenue is lost to the state. Land distribution damaged the agricultural sector, once a source of export revenue, and today Zimbabwe is a net importer of food products. However, there have been recent improvements in the number of smallholders practising conservation agriculture and in crop yields. Tourism is also important, but has declined since 2000, today contributing around 8% of GDP. Zimbabwe saw hyperinflaction from 2000, and in 2016 the government allowed trade to take place in US dollars and other hard currencies rather than the Zimbabwe dollar.


==Geographical & Political Setting==
With relatively low rainfall and unequally distributed surface water resources, groundwater is the main drinking water source in rural areas. Groundwater is also used for irrigation on some commercial as well as smallholder farms. Groundwater is also used to supply some urban water supply systems. However, despite its widespread use, groundwater contributes not more than 10% of total water use.




[[File:Zimbabwe_Political.png | right | frame | Political Map of Zimbabwe (For more information on the datasets used in the map see the [[Geography | geography resources section]])]]
==Authors==


'''Daina Mudimbu''', Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe


===General===
'''Dr Richard Owen''', Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe


'''Emily Crane''', '''Kirsty Upton''', '''Brighid Ó Dochartaigh''', British Geological Survey, UK


'''Imogen Bellwood-Howard''', Institute of Development Studies, UK


{| class = "wikitable"
Please cite this page as: Mudimbo, Owen, Crane, Upton, Ó Dochartaigh and Bellwood-Howard, 2018.


|-
Bibliographic reference: Mudimbo, D., Owen, R., Crane, E., Upton, K., Ó Dochartaigh, B.É. and Bellwood-Howard, I. 2018. Africa Groundwater Atlas: Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe. British Geological Survey. Accessed [date you accessed the information]. https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Hydrogeology_of_Zimbabwe


|Estimated Population in 2013* || 14149648
==Terms and conditions==


|-
The Africa Groundwater Atlas is hosted by the British Geological Survey (BGS) and includes information from third party sources. Your use of information provided by this website is at your own risk. If reproducing diagrams that include third party information, please cite both the Africa Groundwater Atlas and the third party sources. Please see the [[Africa Groundwater Atlas Terms of Use | Terms of use]] for more information.


|Rural Population (% of total)* || 67.4%
==Geographical Setting==


|-
Most of the country forms part of the central plateau, at an elevation of between 1200 and 1600 m. The east is mountainous, with the highest point at Mount Nyangani at 2592 m.
[[File:Zimbabwe_Political.png | right | frame | Zimbabwe. Map developed from USGS GTOPOPO30; GADM global administrative areas; and UN Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. For more information on the map development and datasets see the [[Geography | geography resources section]].]]


|Total Surface Area* || 386850 sq km
===General===


{| class = "wikitable"
|-
|-
 
|Capital city || Harare
|Agricultural Land (% of total area)* || 41.9%
 
|-
|-
 
|Region || Eastern Africa
|Capital City || Harare
 
|-
|-
 
|Border countries || Mozambique, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia
|Region || Eastern Africa


|-
|-
 
|Total surface area* ||390,760 km<sup>2</sup>  (39,076,000 ha)
|Border Countries || Mozambique, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia
 
|-
|-


|Annual Freshwater Withdrawal (2013)* || 4205 Million cubic metres
|Total population (2015)* || 15,603,000
 
|-
|-
 
|Rural population (2015)* ||10,732,000 (69%)
|Annual Freshwater Withdrawal for Agriculture* || 78.9%
 
|-
|-
 
|Urban population (2015)* || 4,871,000 (31%)
|Annual Freshwater Withdrawal for Domestic Use* || 14.0%
 
|-
 
|Annual Freshwater Withdrawal for Industry* || 7.1%
 
|-
 
|Rural Population with Access to Improved Water Source* || 68.7%
 
|-
|-
 
|UN Human Development Index (HDI) [highest = 1] (2014)*|| 0.5087
|Urban Population with Access to Improved Water Source* || 97.3%
 
|}
|}


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Source: [https://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en FAO Aquastat]
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Source: World Bank
 


   
   
===Climate===
===Climate===


Zimbabwe has a tropical climate, with a dry season in which little rain falls, and a rainy season that usually lasts from late October to March. Local climate is moderated by altitude. Rainfall is lowest (less than 500 mm/year) in the south and southwest; between 600 and approximately 1000 mm/year across much of the centre of the country; and only exceeds 1000 mm/year in the mountains of the east.


Broad description of Zimbabwe – major topographical/geographical features e.g. mountain ranges, deserts, coastal areas etc...
[[File:Zimbabwe_ClimateZones.png | 375x365px |Koppen Geiger Climate Zones]][[File:Zimbabwe_ClimatePrecip.png | 375x365px |Average Annual Precipitation]][[File:Zimbabwe_ClimateTemp.png | 375x365px |Average Temperature]]


Climate classification of Zimbabwe. Spatial variations in annual average rainfall and temperature.
[[File:Zimbabwe_pre_Monthly.png| 255x124px| Average monthly precipitation for Zimbabwe showing minimum and maximum (light blue), 25th and 75th percentile (blue), and median (dark blue) rainfall]] [[File:Zimbabwe_tmp_Monthly.png| 255x124px| Average monthly temperature for Zimbabwe showing minimum and maximum (orange), 25th and 75th percentile (red), and median (black) temperature]] [[File:Zimbabwe_pre_Qts.png | 255x124px | Quarterly precipitation over the period 1950-2012]] [[File:Zimbabwe_pre_Mts.png|255x124px | Monthly precipitation (blue) over the period 2000-2012 compared with the long term monthly average (red)]]


More information on average rainfall and temperature for each of the climate zones in Zimbabwe can be seen at the [[Climate of Zimbabwe | Zimbabwe climate page]].


<gallery widths="375px" heights=365px mode=nolines>
These maps and graphs were developed from the CRU TS 3.21 dataset produced by the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK. For more information see the [[Climate | climate resource page]].


File:Zimbabwe_ClimateZones.png |Koppen Geiger Climate Zones
===Surface water===
 
File:Zimbabwe_ClimatePrecip.png |Average Annual Precipitation
 
File:Zimbabwe_ClimateTemp.png |Average Temperature
 
</gallery>


   
   
{|


Temporal variations in temperature and rainfall.
|-
 
Rainfall time-series and graphs of monthly average rainfall and temperature for each individual climate zone can be found on the [[Climate of Zimbabwe | Zimbabwe Climate Page]].
 
 


[[File:Zimbabwe_pre_Monthly.png| 255x124px| Average monthly precipitation for Zimbabwe showing minimum and maximum (light blue), 25th and 75th percentile (blue), and median (dark blue) rainfall]] [[File:Zimbabwe_tmp_Monthly.png| 255x124px| Average monthly temperature for Zimbabwe showing minimum and maximum (orange), 25th and 75th percentile (red), and median (black) temperature]] [[File:Zimbabwe_pre_Qts.png | 255x124px | Quarterly precipitation over the period 1950-2012]] [[File:Zimbabwe_pre_Mts.png|255x124px | Monthly precipitation (blue) over the period 2000-2012 compared with the long term monthly average (red)]]
|The four largest rivers in Zimbabwe are the Zambezi, Limpopo, Save and Pungwe. These are all transboundary rivers, which flow to the Indian Ocean. Two major smaller rivers are the Thuli and Mzingwane, which are tributaries of larger transboundary rivers.  


The Zimbabwe National Water Authority Hydrology Department manages information relating to surface water resources availability.


For further detail on the climate datasets used see the [[Climate | climate resources section]].




===Surface water===




{|


|-


|General information about Zimbabwe surface water – perennial/ephemeral – major rivers – discharge points.


| [[File:Zimbabwe_Hydrology.png | frame | Major surface water features of Zimbabwe. Map developed from World Wildlife Fund HydroSHEDS; Digital Chart of the World drainage; and FAO Inland Water Bodies. For more information on map development and datasets see the [[Surface water | surface water resource page]].]]
 
Additional information from country authors...
 
 
| [[File:Zimbabwe_Hydrology.png | frame | Surface Water Map of Zimbabwe (For more information on the datasets used in the map see the [[Surface water | surface water resources section]])]]


|}
|}
Line 150: Line 102:


|-
|-
| [[File:Zimbabwe_soil.png | frame | Soil Map of Zimbabwe, from the European Commission Joint Research Centre: European Soil Portal. For more information on the map see the [[Soil | soil resource page]].]]


| [[File:Zimbabwe_soil.png | frame | Soil Map of Zimbabwe (For more information on the datasets used in the map see the [[Soil | soil resources section]])]]
|
 
 
|General information about Zimbabwe soils.


|}
|}
Line 166: Line 115:


|-
|-
|
|Most of the country is covered by savannah vegetation, with the wetter mountainous east supporting tropical evergreen and hardwood forests.


|General information about Zimbabwe land cover.




| [[File:Zimbabwe_LandCover.png | frame | Land Cover Map of Zimbabwe (For more information on the datasets used in the map see the [[Land cover | land cover resources section]])]]
[[File:Zimbabwe_LandCover.png | frame | Land Cover Map of Zimbabwe, from the European Space Agency GlobCover 2.3, 2009. For more information on the map see the [[Land cover | land cover resource page]].]]


|}
|}


   
===Water statistics===
 
{| class = "wikitable"
| || 1999 ||2002||2007||2012||2014||2015
|-
|Rural population with access to safe drinking water (%) || || || || || ||67.3
|-
|Urban population with access to safe drinking water (%) || || ||  || || ||97
|-
|Population affected by water related disease || No data|| No data|| No data || No data || No data || No data
|-
|Total internal renewable water resources (cubic metres/inhabitant/year) || || ||  || ||785.7||
|-
|Total exploitable water resources (Million cubic metres/year) || No data|| No data|| No data || No data || No data || No data
|-
|Freshwater withdrawal as % of total renewable water resources || || || 17.85|| || ||
|-
|Total renewable groundwater (Million cubic metres/year) ||  || || || ||6,000 ||
|-
|Exploitable: Regular renewable groundwater (Million cubic metres/year) || || ||  ||1,500 || ||
|-
|Groundwater produced internally (Million cubic metres/year) || || ||  || ||6,000||
|-
|Fresh groundwater withdrawal (primary and secondary) (Million cubic metres/year) ||||420||  || || ||
|-
|Groundwater: entering the country (total) (Million cubic metres/year) || || ||  || || ||
|-
|Groundwater: leaving the country to other countries (total) (Million cubic metres/year) || || ||  || || ||
|-
|Industrial water withdrawal (all water sources) (Million cubic metres/year) || || ||215|| || ||
|-
| Municipal water withdrawal (all water sources) (Million cubic metres/year)  || || ||425|| || ||
|-
|Agricultural water withdrawal (all water sources) (Million cubic metres/year) || || ||2,930|| || ||
|-
|Irrigation water withdrawal (all water sources)<sup>1</sup> (Million cubic metres/year) || No data|| No data|| No data || No data || No data || No data
|-
|Irrigation water requirement (all water sources)<sup>1</sup> (Million cubic metres/year) ||836|| ||  || || ||
|-
|Area of permanent crops (ha) || || ||  || ||100,000 ||
|-
|Cultivated land (arable and permanent crops) (ha) || || ||  || ||4,100,000 ||
|-
|Total area of country cultivated (%) || || ||  || || ||
|-
|Area equipped for irrigation by groundwater (ha) ||20,000 || ||  || || ||
|-
|Area equipped for irrigation by mixed surface water and groundwater (ha) || No data|| No data|| No data || No data || No data || No data
|}
 
These statistics are sourced from [https://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm FAO Aquastat]. More information on the derivation and interpretation of these statistics can be seen on the FAO Aquastat website.


Further water and related statistics can be accessed at the [https://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en Aquastat Main Database].


<sup>1</sup> More information on [https://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/water_use_agr/index.stm irrigation water use and requirement statistics]


==Geology==
==Geology==


The following section provides a summary of the geology of Zimbabwe. More detailed information can be found in the key references listed below: many of these are available through the [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/index.cfm Africa Groundwater Literature Archive].
This section provides a summary of the geology of Zimbabwe. More detail can be found in the references listed at the bottom of this page. Many of these references can be accessed through the [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/index.cfm Africa Groundwater Literature Archive].


The geology map on this page shows a simplified overview of the geology at a national scale (see the [[Geology | Geology resource page]] for more details).


The geology map below was created for this Atlas. It shows a simplified version of the geology of Zimbabwe at a national scale. ''The map is available to download as a shapefile (.shp) for use in GIS packages.''
[https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/downloadGIS.html '''Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map'''].


[[File:Zimbabwe_Geology.png | right]]
[[File:Zimbabwe_Geology3.png | center | thumb| 500px | Geology of Zimbabwe at 1:5 million scale. Based on map described by Persits et al. 2002/Furon and Lombard 1964. For more information on the map development and datasets see the [[Geology | geology resource page]]. [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/downloadGIS.html Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map].]]


   
   
{| class = "wikitable"
{| class = "wikitable"


Line 201: Line 200:
|-
|-


!colspan="4"| Unconsolidated Sedimentary
!colspan="4"| Unconsolidated sedimentary


|-
|-
Line 207: Line 206:
|
|


||Pleistocene
||Quaternary (Pleistocene to Recent)


||Unconsolidated sequence of clay, sand and gravel of varying thickness in the river valleys.
||Unconsolidated sedimentary sequences of alluvial clay, sand and gravel of varying thickness in the river valleys.


||In Sabi Valley reported thicknesses of up to 70-80 m of alluvium are present and 45 m in the Zambezi Valley. Elsewhere the unconsolidated deposits are generally less than 25 m thick.
||There are reported alluvium thicknesses of up to 70-80 m in Sabi Valley, and 45 m in the Zambezi Valley. Elsewhere, the unconsolidated deposits are generally less than 25 m thick.


|-
|-
Line 219: Line 218:
|-
|-


|Lower Pipe Sandstone and the Kalahari Sand.
|Lower Pipe Sandstone and Kalahari Sand.


||Tertiary and Quaternary
||Tertiary and Quaternary


||The Pipe Sandstone is in places unconsolidated or weakly cemented by silica and traversed by numerous hollow pipes.  It is composed of buff or pink sands. In places it is cemented into a hard secondary quartzite or silcrete. The Kalahari Sand comprises pink or buff coloured, structureless, aeolian sand with a high proportion of fine silt.
||The Pipe Sandstone is composed of buff or pink sands. It is unconsolidated in places; in others it is weakly cemented by silica, and traversed by numerous hollow pipes; and in some places it is cemented into a hard secondary quartzite or silcrete.  
 
The Kalahari Sand comprises pink or buff coloured, structureless, aeolian sand with a high proportion of fine silt.


||Approximately 44000 km² of western Zimbabwe is covered by unconsolidated Kalahari Sands. In places, the thickness of the sand is in excess of 100 m.
||Approximately 44000 km² of western Zimbabwe is covered by unconsolidated Kalahari Sands. In places, the thickness of the sand is in excess of 100 m.
Line 235: Line 236:
|
|


||Cretaceous-Tertiary
||Cretaceous sedimentary


||Mudstone, arkose, grit conglomerate and sandstone bands
||Mudstones, fine grained arkose, grit-conglomerate and sandstone bands


||
||
Line 243: Line 244:
|-
|-


!colspan="4"| Igneous Largely Volcanic
!colspan="4"| Igneous - Upper Karoo Basalt


|-
|-
Line 263: Line 264:
|Upper and Lower Karoo
|Upper and Lower Karoo


|| Carboniferous - Permian
||Carboniferous to Permian
 
||These arenaceous and argillaceous sequences are conventionally sub-divided into the Upper and Lower Karoo.  The Upper Karoo comprises the Forest Sandstone and the Escarpment Grit, while the Lower Karoo consists of the Madumabisa Mudstone, and the Upper and Lower Wankie Hwange) Sandstone.


This thick series of alternating sandstones, siltstones and mudstone is overlain by the Karoo basalt.
||These arenaceous and argillaceous sequences are conventionally subdivided into the Upper and Lower Karoo.  The Upper Karoo comprises the Forest Sandstone and the Escarpment Grit. The Lower Karoo consists of the Madumabisa Mudstone and the Upper and Lower Wankie Hwange Sandstone.


This thick series of alternating sandstones, siltstones and mudstone is overlain by the Upper Karoo Batoka basalts (see above).
||
||


Line 277: Line 277:
|-
|-


| Great Dyke
|Great Dyke


||Late Precambrian
||Late Precambrian
Line 283: Line 283:
||The Great Dyke is a large linear mafic-ultramafic intrusive feature composed of norite, gabbro and anorthosite.
||The Great Dyke is a large linear mafic-ultramafic intrusive feature composed of norite, gabbro and anorthosite.


|| Up to 1000 m thick
||Up to 1000 m thick


|-
|-


!colspan="4"| Precambrian calcareous metasediments and quartzite
!colspan="4"|Precambrian Metasediments


|-
|-


|In the south-east of Kariba, sedimentary, calcareous and metamorphic rocks of the Deweras, Lomagundi and Piriwiri (all part of the Magondi orogenic belt), Sijarira and Tengwe River GroupsThe Umkondo Group
|Umkondo Group; Deweras, Lomagundi and Piriwiri formations (all part of the Magondi orogenic belt); Sijarira and Tengwe River groups.   


||Mid to Late Precambrian (Proterozoic)
||Mid to Late Precambrian (Proterozoic)


||Phyllites with subordinate quartzite of the Piriwiri Formation. slates and shales with minor quartzite of the Lomagundi Formation, shales of the Tengwe River Group and shales, siltstone and fine grained sandstone of the Sijarira Group.
||These Precambrian metasedimentary rocks include shales, phyllites, quartzites, siltstones, sandstones, conglomerates, limestones and dolomites as well as minor basic metavolcanics. The Deweras, Lomagundi and Piriwiri formations are all part of the Magondi orogenic belt. The Piriwiri Formation comprises phyllites with subordinate quartzites. The Lomagundi Formation comprises slates and shales with minor quartzites. The Tengwe River Group comprises shales. The Sijarira Group comprises shales, siltstones and fine grained sandstones.
 
These rocks include shales, phyllites, quartzites, siltstones, sandstones, conglomerates, limestones and dolomites as well as basic metavolcanics.
 
||
||


|-
|-


!colspan="4"| Precambrian Craton -  Metavolcanics and Metasediments (Greenstone Belts)
!colspan="4"|Precambrian Basement Complex and Metavolcanics  


|-
|-


|Greenstones made up of the supergroups of the Sebakwean, Belingwean, Bulawayan and Shamvaian
|Precambrian Basement Complex with belts of metavolcanics and greenstones, including the Sebakwean, Belingwean, Bulawayan and Shamvaian supergroups.


||Early Precambrian / Archaean
||Early Precambrian / Archaean


||Irregularly shaped bodies of greenstone material (also known as gold-belts). The Greenstone Belts comprise metavolcanics and metasediments.
||The Basement Complex covers at least 60% of the country area, including a large portion of central Zimbabwe. It is characterised by vast areas of gneissose rocks into which younger granite bodies of various sizes have been intruded, including Proterozoic granites, and granodiorites, adamellites and tonalites of the Younger Intrusive Granites.  


||Moderate to deep weathering occurs within the Greenstone Belts.
The Basement Complex contains irregularly shaped bodies of greenstone material, making up mineralised greenstone/gold belts, which also contain metavolcanics and minor metasediments. Other linear belts are formed by dolerites and sheets of dolerite composition trending in various directions across the Basement Complex area.


|-
The Limpopo and Zambezi Mobile Belts are zones of deformed and metamorphosed rocks with a SSW-NNE trend in the south of the country, and a NW-SE trend across the north of Zimbabwe and into Zambia.  They comprise paragneisses and anorthosite gneisses.


!colspan="4"| Precambrian Craton (Granites, gneisses and mobile belt gneisses)
||Different weathering thicknesses occurs in the Basement Complex, distinguished by different erosional surfaces. Weathering thicknesses range from greater than 30 to 35 m on the African erosional surface, to shallow, less than 30 m on the Post African and Pliocene/Quaternary surfaces.


|-
Moderate to deep weathering occurs within the Greenstone Belts.
 
|The Basement Complex Granitoids, and Mobile/orogenic Belts (Limpopo and Zambezi).
 
||Archaean
 
||The Basement Complex occupies a large portion of central Zimbabwe and is characterised by vast areas of gneissose rocks, into which younger granite bodies of various sizes were intruded.  These intrusive rocks include younger Proterozoic granites and granodiorite, adamellite and tonalite of the Younger Intrusive Granites.
 
The Limpopo and Zambezi Mobile Belts are zones of deformed and metamorphosed rocks which run SSW-NNE in the south of the country and NW-SE across the north of Zimbabwe and into Zambia respectively.  They comprise paragneisses and anorthosite gneisses.
 
There are additional lineaments formed by dolerites and sheets of dolerite composition.
 
||Erosional surfaces distinguish the general thickness of the weathering in this unit which ranges from greater than 30 to 35 m on the African erosional surface to shallow and less than 30 m on the Post African and Pliocene/Quaternary surfaces.


|-
|-
Line 339: Line 324:
==Hydrogeology==
==Hydrogeology==


This section will contain a broad overview of the hydrogeology.
This section provides a summary of the hydrogeology of the main aquifers in Zimbabwe.  More information is available in the references listed at the bottom of this page. Many of these references can be accessed through the [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/index.cfm Africa Groundwater Literature Archive].
 
The hydrogeology map on this page shows a simplified overview of the type and productivity of the main aquifers at a national scale (see the [[Africa Groundwater Atlas Hydrogeology Maps  | Hydrogeology map resource page]] for more details).  


[https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/downloadGIS.html '''Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map'''].


===Aquifer properties===
Zimbabwe is also covered by the SADC hydrogeological map and atlas (2010), available through the [https://ggis.un-igrac.org/ggis-viewer/viewer/sadcgip/public/default SADC Groundwater Information Portal].


[[File:Zimbabwe_Hydrogeology.png]] [[File: Hydrogeology_Key.png | 500x195px]]
[[File:Zimbabwe_Hydrogeology3.png| center | thumb| 500px | Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe at 1:5 million scale. For more information on how the map was developed see the [[Africa Groundwater Atlas Hydrogeology Maps  | hydrogeology map]] resource page. [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/downloadGIS.html '''Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map].]].




'''Groundwater development potential'''
'''Groundwater development potential'''


In the National Master Plan for Rural Supply, Interconsult (1986) classed aquifers by their Groundwater development potential, as follows:
In the National Master Plan for Rural Supply, Interconsult (1986) classed aquifers in Zimbabwe by their groundwater development potential, as follows:
 
*High: Suitable for primary supply, piped supplies, and small and large-scale irrigation schemes
*High: Suitable for primary supply, piped supplies, and small and large-scale irrigation schemes
*Moderate: Suitable for primary supplies, small piped schemes and small-scale irrigation schemes
*Moderate: Suitable for primary supplies, small piped schemes and small-scale irrigation schemes
*Low: Suitable for primary supplied from boreholes.
*Low: Suitable for primary supplied from boreholes.
These groundwater development potential rankings are reflected in the hydrogeology map above, with a description of the aquifer type (hydrogeological environent) of each aquifer.


====Unconsolidated====
====Unconsolidated====
Line 359: Line 349:
{| class = "wikitable"
{| class = "wikitable"


|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quantity issues||Water quality issues||Recharge
|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quality issues


|-
|-


| Save Alluvial Aquifer, Umzingwane Alluvial aquifer, Grootvlei/Limpopo (transboundary), Kalahari Sand Aquifer
|Save Alluvial Aquifer, Umzingwane Alluvial aquifer, Grootvlei/Limpopo (transboundary)  
 
||The Kalahari Sands and various alluvial deposits across the country form unconfined aquifers.
 
Alluvial deposits are only locally developed within Zimbabwe with the largest occurrences found in the Save (Sabi)- Limpopo river system and major tributaries, along the Zambezi  and along the Munyati  and Sessami rivers in the north-west.  The alluvial deposits vary in thickness, being generally less than 25 m in most areas, but as much as 45 m in the Zambezi Valley and up to 70 m in the Sabi Valley.


The Kalahari Sands are mainly unconsolidated but also contain the consolidated Pipe Sandstone.
||Alluvial deposits are only locally developed within Zimbabwe, with the largest occurrences found in the Save (Sabi)- Limpopo river system and major tributaries; along the Zambezi River; and along the Munyati and Sessami rivers in the northwest. The alluvial deposits vary in thickness, being generally less than 25 m in most areas, but as much as 45 m in the Zambezi Valley and up to 70 m in the Sabi Valley. Where thick and permeable enough, they can form unconfined aquifers with high groundwater development potential.


The aquifer properties of the Kalahari Sands and Alluvial Deposits are extremely variable and may range from locally low to locally high average hydraulic conditions. The water table is generally over 20 m deep.
Aquifer properties are extremely variable and may range from locally low to locally high average hydraulic conductivity. The water table ranges from about 5 - 40 m deep, but is generally over 20 m deep.
 
Boreholes in the alluvial deposits are typically 20 – 70 m deep, and provide yields of 100-5000 m<sup>3</sup>/d.
 
Boreholes in the Kalahari Sands are commonly 70 – 100 m deep, and provide yields of 100-1000 m<sup>3</sup>/d.
 
||These aquifers have high groundwater development potential.


Boreholes in the alluvial deposits are typically 20 – 70 m deep, and provide yields of 100-5000 m³/d.
||Water quality is generally good.  Lenses of brackish water occur in the alluvium of the Sabi river, which may be fossil water and/or water recharging via the adjacent Karoo strata.
||Water quality is generally good.  Lenses of brackish water occur in the alluvium of the Sabi river, which may be fossil water and/or water recharging via the adjacent Karoo strata.
 
|-
|Kalahari Sands
||The Kalahari Sands aquifer is mainly unconsolidated, but also include the consolidated Pipe Sandstone. It forms an unconfined aquifer with high groundwater development potential. Boreholes in the Kalahari Sands are commonly 70 – 100 m deep, and provide yields of 100-1000 m³/d.  The aquifer properties of the Kalahari Sands are extremely variable and may range from locally low to locally high average hydraulic conditions.  The water table is generally over 20 m deep.
||
||
|}
|}


====Consolidated Sedimentary - Intergranular Flow====
====Igneous - Fracture Flow====


{| class = "wikitable"
{| class = "wikitable"


|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quantity issues||Water quality issues||Recharge
|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quality issues


|-
|-
|Igneous – Karoo Basalt
||Aquifers in the Karoo volcanic rocks are limited to discrete zones of weathering, fracturing and jointing, and contact zones with underlying Forest Sandstone and interbedded sandstone. Wide sheets of basalt occur in the Victoria Falls and Nyamamdhlovu, and Beitbridge and Chiredzi areas with numerous smaller remnants forming high lying cappings in the Gokwe area. Where suitably weathered, they have moderate groundwater development potential. The aquifers are unconfined, and have variable transmissivity from about 9 to 90 m<sup>2</sup>/d, and specific capacity values of the order of 1 to 10 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.


|Cretaceous-Tertiary sedimentary strata
The water table is usually less than 15 m depth, and borehole depths average 50 m, varying from about 40 to 60 m.  Borehole yields vary from 10 to 250 m<sup>3</sup>/d.
 
||The aquifer properties of these sedimentary rocks are controlled by primary porosity and permeability. The more favourable horizons are the conglomerates and cleaner sandstones, and in the vicinity of rivers.
 
Water tables are typically less than 15 m deep, and boreholes are usually drilled to 70 – 100 m depthTransmissivity is usually less than 1.5 m<sup>2</sup>/d, and specific capacity below 10 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
 
||These aquifers have low groundwater development potential.
 
||Water quality is moderate to good with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations ranging from  less than 1000 mg/l to 2000 mg/l.  The water poses a potential encrustation hazard.
 
||


|| The quality of groundwater in the basalts is good, with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations normally below 1000 mg/l. There is no identified fluoride hazard, although it may pose a mild encrustation hazard in places.
|}
|}


====Igneous - Fracture Flow====
====Sedimentary - Intergranular Flow====


{| class = "wikitable"
{| class = "wikitable"


|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quantity issues||Water quality issues||Recharge
|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quality issues


|-
|-
|Cretaceous Sedimentary
||The aquifer properties of these sedimentary rocks are controlled by primary porosity and permeability. The more favourable horizons are the conglomerates and cleaner sandstones, particularly in the vicinity of rivers. However, overall these aquifers have low groundwater development potential.


|Igneous – largely volcanic
Water tables are typically less than 15 m deep, and boreholes are usually drilled to 70 – 100 m depth. Transmissivity is usually less than 1.5 m<sup>2</sup>/d, and specific capacity below 10 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
 
||Water quality is moderate to good with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations ranging from  less than 1000 mg/l to 2000 mg/l. The water poses a potential encrustation hazard.
||Aquifers in the volcanic igneous rocks are limited to discrete zones of weathering, fracturing and jointing, and contact zones with underlying Forest Sandstone and interbedded sandstone. Wide sheets of basalt occur in the Victoria Falls and Nyamamdhlovu, and Beitbridge and Chiredzi areas with numerous smaller remnants forming high lying cappings in the Gokwe area.
 
These aquifers are unconfined, have variable transmissivity from about  9 – 90 m<sup>2</sup>/d and specific capacity of the order of 1-10 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
 
The water table is usually less than 15 m depth, and borehole depths average 50 m, varying from about 40 to 60 m.  Borehole yields vary from 10 to 250 m<sup>3</sup>/d.
 
||This aquifer has moderate groundwater development potential.
 
|| The quality of the groundwater in this unit is good, with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations normally below 1000 mg/l. There is no identified fluoride hazard, although it may pose a mild encrustation hazard in places.
 
||
 
|}
|}


====Consolidated Sedimentary - Intergranular & Fracture Flow (Karoo sequence)====
====Sedimentary - Intergranular & Fracture Flow (Karoo Sequence)====


{| class = "wikitable"
{| class = "wikitable"
|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quantity issues||Water quality issues||Recharge
|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quality issues
|-
|
||
The hydraulic conductivity ranges from 0.1 to 2.09 m/d and specific yield from 0.02 to 0.11.
||
||
||
|-
|-
|Nyamandhlovu Forest Sandstone aquifers (Karoo)
||The Forest Sandstone is widely developed in the Hwange – Zambezi Basin and constitutes an important regional aquifer, with high groundwater development potential.  It is mainly confined, being unconfined only close to outcrop.  Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels sometimes less than 10 m depth but more commonly greater than 20 m depth.  Yields range from 0.1 to 5.9 l/s.
Recharge estimates indicate an annual recharge of 105.5 mm with 38.4%, 52.1% and 9.5% accounting respectively for direct recharge, water mains and sewer leakages (Rusinga and Taigbenu 2005).
||Water quality is generally good with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration below 1000 mg/l.  There is no recognised fluoride threat, although it may pose a mild encrustation hazard.


|Nyamandhlovu Forest Sandstone aquifers (Karoo)
||The Forest Sandstone is widely developed in the Hwange – Zambezi Basin and constitutes an important regional aquifer.  It is mainly confined, being unconfined only close to outcrop.  Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels sometimes less than 10 m depth but more commonly greater than 20 m depth.  Yields range from 0.1 to 5.9 l/s.
||This aquifer has high groundwater development potential.
||Water quality is generally good with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration below 1000 mg/ l.  There is no recognised fluoride threat, although it may pose a mild encrustation hazard.
||Recharge estimates indicate an annual recharge of 105.5 mm with 38.4%, 52.1% and 9.5% accounting respectively for direct recharge, water mains and sewer leakages (Rusinga and Taigbenu 2005).
|-
|-
|Escarpment Grit
|Escarpment Grit
||The Escarpment Grit forms a confined aquifer in the Hwange and Save-Limpopo basin.  Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels about 10 – 15 m and greater than 20 m depth respectively. Yields range from 1.2 to 3.5 l/s.
||The Escarpment Grit forms a confined aquifer in the Hwange and Save-Limpopo basin, with a high groundwater development potential.  Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels about 10 – 15 m and greater than 20 m depth respectively. Yields range from 1.2 to 3.5 l/s.
||This aquifer has high groundwater development potential.
||
||  
||  
|-
|-
|Madumabisa Mudstone
|Madumabisa Mudstone
||The Madumabisa Mudstone is associated with shallow weathering, but has low groundwater development potential. Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels about 10 – 15 m and greater than 20 m depth respectively.  Yields are relatively low in the Madumabisa Mudstone (0.1 - 0.6 l/s); successful boreholes are usually sited in the vicinity of rivers.
||The Madumabisa Mudstone is associated with shallow weathering, but has low groundwater development potential. Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels about 10 – 15 m and greater than 20 m depth respectively.  Yields are relatively low in the Madumabisa Mudstone (0.1 - 0.6 l/s); successful boreholes are usually sited in the vicinity of rivers.
||This aquifer has low groundwater development potential.
||
||  
||  
|-
|-
|Upper and Lower Hwange (Wankie) Sandstone
|Upper and Lower Hwange (Wankie) Sandstone
||The Upper and Lower Hwange Sandstone is widespread in the Karoo basin; it is found at depth and the aquifer is always confined. It was previously known as the Wankie Sandstone. Boreholes are usually 100 – 150 m deep in the Upper and Lower Hwange Sandstones.  Yields range from 1.2 to 5.8 l/s.
||The Upper and Lower Hwange Sandstone is widespread in the Karoo basin and has high groundwater development potential. It is found at depth and the aquifer is always confined. It was previously known as the Wankie Sandstone. Boreholes are usually 100 – 150 m deep in the Upper and Lower Hwange Sandstones.  Yields range from 1.2 to 5.8 l/s.
||This aquifer has high groundwater development potential.
||
||  
||  
|-
|-
|}
|}


====Consolidated Sedimentary – Fracture flow (including karst development)====
====Sedimentary – Fracture flow (including karst)====


{| class = "wikitable"
{| class = "wikitable"


|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quantity issues||Water quality issues||Recharge
|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quality issues


|-
|-


|Lomagundi Dolomite and Tengwe River Formation
|Precambrian Metasediments - Lomagundi Dolomite and Tengwe River Formation


||Some water-bearing horizons exist within the rocks mapped as Precambrian calcareous metasediments and quartzite.  Aquifers exist primarily due to karst features in the calcareous rocks of the Tengwe River and Lomagundi Dolomite formations (massive dolomites and limestones). Karst features are thought to be developed to an average depth of approximately 60 -70 m.  Weathering of shaley horizons in the limestones also increases the potential for groundwater storage and flow.
||Some water-bearing horizons exist within the Precambrian metasediments.  Aquifers exist primarily due to karst features in the calcareous rocks of the Tengwe River and Lomagundi Dolomite formations (massive dolomites and limestones). Karst features are thought to be developed to an average depth of approximately 60 -70 m.  Weathering of shaley horizons in the limestones also increases the potential for groundwater storage and flow.


Yields of 500 - >2000 m<sup>3</sup>/d are possible.
The Lomagundi Dolomite has high groundwater development potential. Average specific capacity of boreholes is 505 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m. Typical borehole depths are 60 to 80 m .  The water level varies from ground level at spring occurrences to 50 m depth, depending on land use (commercial or subsistence farming).  


||
The Tengwe River Formation has moderate groundwater development potential. Borehole specific capacity is 4 to 120 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m. Typical borehole depths are 50 – 70 m.  Water levels tend to be generally shallow (about 10 m) in the area of Tengwe limestone/shaley limestone.
 
||
 
||


Yields of 500 - >2000 m<sup>3</sup>/d are possible.
||Water quality in the Lomagundi Dolomite is generally very good with a slightly hard calcium/magnesium character. Water quality in the Tengwe River Formation is generally very good with a slightly hard calcium/magnesium character.
|-
|-
|Lomagundi Dolomite
|}
||Typical borehole depths are 60 – 80 m in the Lomagundi Formations.  The water level varies from ground level at spring occurrences to 50 m depth, depending on land use (commercial or subsistence farming).


The specific capacity of boreholes in the Lomagundi Dolomite is 505 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
====Basement Complex and Metavolcanics, including the Great Dyke====


||This aquifer has high groundwater development potential.
{| class = "wikitable"
||The water quality is generally very good with a slightly hard calcium/magnesium character.
||


|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quality issues
|-
|-
|Tengwe River Formation
|Precambrian Basement Complex
||Typical borehole depths are 50 – 70 m in the Tengwe River Formation.  Water levels tend to be generally shallow (about 10 m) in the area of Tengwe limestone/shaley limestone.
||The gneissose rocks and intrusive granites of the Basement Complex are devoid of any primary porosity, so the aquifer properties of these basement rocks are controlled by the degree of secondary porosity and permeability, often associated with fracturing, jointing, schistosity planes and weathering. Two hydrogeological sub-units are recognized, each with characteristic groundwater occurrence: 
 
The specific capacity of boreholes in the Tengwe River Formation is 4 -120 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
||This aquifer has moderate groundwater development potential.
||The water quality is generally very good with a slightly hard calcium/magnesium character.
||
 
|}


====Basement====
- the granite and gneiss below the African erosion surface; and


{| class = "wikitable"
- the granite and gneiss below the Post-African and Pliocene Quaternary erosion surfaces.


|Named Aquifers||General Description||Water quantity issues||Water quality issues||Recharge
These aquifers have low groundwater development potential. The highest groundwater development potential is found in those areas possessing the deepest and most aerially extensive weathering as in the larger African surface. Chemical weathering along faults, shear zones and dyke contacts may produce equally important water bearing structures.
 
|-
|
||The gneissose rocks and intrusive granites are devoid of any primary porosity, so the aquifer properties of these basement rocks are controlled by the degree of secondary porosity and permeability, often associated with fracturing, jointing, schistosity planes and weathering. Two hydrogeological sub-units are recognized, each with characteristic groundwater occurrence: 
*the granite and gneiss below the African erosion surface; and
*the granite and gneiss below the Post-African and Pliocene Quaternary erosion surfaces.
||These aquifers have low groundwater development potential. The highest groundwater development potential is found in those areas possessing the deepest and most aerially extensive weathering as in the larger African surface. Chemical weathering along faults, shear zones and dyke contacts may produce equally important water bearing structures.


Incorrectly sited boreholes may fail during the dry season.
Incorrectly sited boreholes may fail during the dry season.
||
||
||


Line 532: Line 465:
|Granite and gneiss below the African erosion surface
|Granite and gneiss below the African erosion surface
||Rocks beneath the African erosion surface have relatively well developed hydraulic properties resulting from extensive weathering, which generally exceeds 30 - 35 m in depth.  Aquifer thickness is about 30 to 50 metres; boreholes are usually drilled to 40 – 50 m depth.  Sustainable borehole yields are in the region of 50 - 100 m<sup>3</sup>/d. Here, transmissivity is low to moderate (<10 m<sup>2</sup>/d) and specific capacity is moderate (30-50 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m).
||Rocks beneath the African erosion surface have relatively well developed hydraulic properties resulting from extensive weathering, which generally exceeds 30 - 35 m in depth.  Aquifer thickness is about 30 to 50 metres; boreholes are usually drilled to 40 – 50 m depth.  Sustainable borehole yields are in the region of 50 - 100 m<sup>3</sup>/d. Here, transmissivity is low to moderate (<10 m<sup>2</sup>/d) and specific capacity is moderate (30-50 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m).
||
||Groundwater in the aquifers beneath the African erosion surface is generally of good quality with a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration below 1000 mg/l and no recorded fluoride hazard.
||Groundwater in the aquifers beneath the African erosion surface is generally of good quality with a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration below 1000 mg/l and no recorded fluoride hazard.
||
 


|-
|-
|Granite and gneiss below the Post-African and Pliocene Quaternary erosion surfaces
|Granite and gneiss below the Post-African and Pliocene Quaternary erosion surfaces
||The hydraulic properties of the rocks beneath the Post-African and Pliocene-Quaternary erosion surfaces are considerably less well developed.  Areas of weathering tend to be patchy and shallow (10 - 30 m).  Aquifer thickness is about 10 to 30 m, often less than 15 m.  Boreholes are typically 30 – 40 m depth.  The transmissivity of these rocks is low (1 – 10 m<sup>2</sup>/d), while boreholes have low to moderately low specific capacity of the order 2 – 20 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
||The hydraulic properties of the rocks beneath the Post-African and Pliocene-Quaternary erosion surfaces are considerably less well developed.  Areas of weathering tend to be patchy and shallow (10 - 30 m).  Aquifer thickness is about 10 to 30 m, often less than 15 m.  Boreholes are typically 30 – 40 m depth.  The transmissivity of these rocks is low (1 – 10 m<sup>2</sup>/d), while boreholes have low to moderately low specific capacity of the order 2 – 20 m<sup>3</sup>/d/m.
||Areas of granite and gneiss pavement, very shallow bedrock and inselbergs and other features producing positive relief common in the Post-African and Pliocene/Quaternary surfaces are associated with marginal to nil groundwater resources.
 
Areas of granite and gneiss pavement, very shallow bedrock and inselbergs and other features producing positive relief common in the Post-African and Pliocene/Quaternary surfaces are associated with marginal to nil groundwater resources.
||In aquifers associated with the Post-African and Pliocene/Quaternary surface the groundwater quality is generally good.  TDS is usually below 1000 mg/l, however it is higher in the Beitbridge and Nuanesti area (TDS of 1000 to 2000 mg/l) where there is also a fluoride hazard.
||In aquifers associated with the Post-African and Pliocene/Quaternary surface the groundwater quality is generally good.  TDS is usually below 1000 mg/l, however it is higher in the Beitbridge and Nuanesti area (TDS of 1000 to 2000 mg/l) where there is also a fluoride hazard.


|-
|Greenstone belts, including the Bulawayan Supergroup
||The rocks of the Greenstone belts generally have very low permeability, but groundwater occurs where fracturing and weathering have created adequate porosity and permeability, and consequently this aquifer has high groundwater development potential. The Bulawayan Supergroup can support yields of 1.2 - 2.9 l/s (Interconsult 1986).  The average borehole depth is in the range 30 - 50 m, and the water level is typically from 5 to greater than 20 m below ground level.
||
||


|}
|}
Line 549: Line 484:
===Groundwater Status===
===Groundwater Status===


'''Groundwater quality'''
'''Groundwater quantity'''


As a general comment to the groundwater development of Zimbabwe all the hydrogeological units are equally suitable for the development of single point primary water supplies either by means of dug wells or by boreholes. Furthermore units classified as possessing moderate or high groundwater development potential are capable of supporting extensive exploitation for piped water supplies and irrigation schemes (Interconsult, 1985).
Overall, all the hydrogeological units in Zimbabwe are suitable for the development of small, single point primary water supplies, either by means of dug wells or by boreholes. Units classified as possessing moderate or high groundwater development potential are capable of supporting more extensive exploitation for piped water supplies and irrigation schemes (Interconsult 1985).


'''Groundwater quantity'''
'''Groundwater quality'''


The groundwater quality throughout Zimbabwe is usually good and does not pose any constraint to use for human consumption. Of the constituents that are a threat to health, the few cases of high nitrate are ascribed to poor borehole construction.
The groundwater quality throughout Zimbabwe is usually good and generally does not pose any constraint to use for human consumption. Of the constituents that are a threat to health, the few cases of high nitrate are ascribed to poor borehole construction.


High fluoride is found in isolated pockets in the Gokwe area and appear to be associated with the outcrop area of the Wankie (Hwange) Sandstone.  At the regional scale, fluoride concentrations are not a constraint to exploitation (Interconsult, 1985).
High fluoride is found in isolated pockets in the Gokwe area and appear to be associated with the outcrop area of the Wankie (Hwange) Sandstone.  At the regional scale, fluoride concentrations are not a constraint to exploitation (Interconsult 1985).


==Groundwater use and management==
==Groundwater use and management==
Line 563: Line 498:
=== Groundwater use===
=== Groundwater use===


According to the 2012 census, about 38% of a total of 3,059,016 Zimbabwean households fetched their water from boreholes and protected wells (Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency, 2012).
Groundwater is the main drinking water source in rural parts of Zimbabwe. According to the 2012 census, about 38% of a total of 3,059,016 Zimbabwean households fetched their water from boreholes and protected wells (Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency 2012). The total annual abstraction of groundwater in the rural areas, from an estimated 40,000 boreholes, is estimated at 35 x 10 6 m³.  


“Groundwater in Zimbabwe forms the main source of drinking water in rural areas where about 70% of the population lives” (Sunguro et al, 2000).
In addition to domestic use in rural and urban areas, groundwater supplies agriculture and industry in Zimbabwe. The total groundwater abstraction for the agricultural sector is estimated at 350 x 10 6 m³. Groundwater is also abstracted for emerging towns known as Growth Points (e.g. Gokwe), urban centres (e.g. Bulawayo) and rural institutions (e.g. schools, health and business centres).  


In addition to domestic use in rural and urban areas, groundwater supplies agriculture and industry in Zimbabwe.
Overall, groundwater presently contributes not more than 10% to the total water use in Zimbabwe (Sunguro et al. 2000).


The total annual abstraction of groundwater in the rural areas, from  some 40,000 boreholes, is estimated at 35 x 10 6 m3 and the total groundwater abstraction for the agricultural sector is estimated at 350 x 10 6 m3. Groundwater is also abstracted for emerging towns known as Growth Points (e.g. Gokwe), Urban Centres (e.g. Bulawayo) and Rural Institutions (e.g. schools, health and business centres). Overall, groundwater presently contributes not more than 10% to the total water use in Zimbabwe (Sunguro et al, 2000).
'''Groundwater source types'''


Water is mainly abstracted by boreholes with a hand pump fitted in rural areas, due to limited electrification, while electric pumps are more common in urban areas.
In rural areas, water is mainly abstracted by boreholes fitted with a hand pump, due to limited electrification. The standard hand pump in Zimbabwe has traditionally been the unique ‘Zimbabwe bush pump’, which is relatively robust, but a lack of maintenance and support of all water supply infrastructure has led to increasing levels of failure.
 
Electric borehole pumps are more common in urban areas, although there has been an increase in the number of private urban boreholes where there is inadequate municipal water supply infrastructure.


=== Groundwater management===
=== Groundwater management===
Line 579: Line 516:
The Water Act (1998) established the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA), a parastatal tasked with providing a framework for the development, management, utilisation and conservation of the country’s water resources through a coordinated approach.  ZINWA has a groundwater branch tasked with specifically looking into the management of the national groundwater resources.
The Water Act (1998) established the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA), a parastatal tasked with providing a framework for the development, management, utilisation and conservation of the country’s water resources through a coordinated approach.  ZINWA has a groundwater branch tasked with specifically looking into the management of the national groundwater resources.


The Water Act also specifies the establishment of Catchment Councils. Seven Catchment Councils were established in the major hydrological zones of the country with functions that included preparing an outline plan for their river systems, determining applications and granting water permits, regulating and supervising the use of water, supervising the performance of functions by Sub-catchment Councils, and dealing with conflicts over water. Water resources include groundwater resources, though due to the limited capacity and lack of adequate information regarding the quantity of groundwater, the management of this resource poses a challenge to the councils.
The Water Act also specifies the establishment of Catchment Councils. Seven catchment councils were established in the major hydrological zones of the country, with functions covering both groundwater and surface water, including: preparing an outline plan for river systems, determining applications and granting water permits, regulating and supervising the use of water, supervising the performance of functions by Sub-catchment Councils, and dealing with conflicts over water. However, due to the limited capacity and lack of adequate information regarding the quantity of groundwater, groundwater resource management poses a challenge to the councils.


Recent developments in the major cities of a collapse of the municipal water treatment and distribution systems has seen  a shift towards the use of groundwater at household and even industrial levels,  with a rise in bulk water suppliers abstracting huge volumes of water from the groundwater resource. This has raised new challenges of conflict over lowering groundwater levels in residential areas which the catchment councils have inadequately capacity to deal with.
Recent developments in the major cities have seen a collapse in municipal water treatment and distribution systems, with a shift towards the private use of groundwater at household and even industrial levels. There has been a rise in bulk water suppliers abstracting huge volumes of groundwater. This has led to new challenges in dealing with conflict over falling groundwater levels in residential areas, which the catchment councils have inadequate capacity to deal with.


In addition to the Water Act (1998), groundwater regulations and guidelines were developed for Zimbabwe in 1999 to control groundwater development and management. The regulations and guidelines compliment the Water Act (1998) and have been formulated within a framework of integrated water resources management (IWRM).
In addition to the Water Act (1998), groundwater regulations and guidelines were developed for Zimbabwe in 1999 to control groundwater development and management. The regulations and guidelines compliment the Water Act (1998) and have been formulated within a framework of integrated water resources management (IWRM).
Line 587: Line 524:
=== Transboundary aquifers===
=== Transboundary aquifers===


Summary of transboundary aquifers
Zimbabwe has five transboundary aquifers as detailed by UN-IGRAC (2012):
 
Zimbabwe has five transboundary aquifers as detailed by UN-IGRAC, 2012:


*Limpopo Basin (Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe)
*Limpopo Basin (Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe)


* Tuli Karoo Sub-basin (Botswana, South Africa, Zimbabwe)
*Tuli Karoo Sub-basin (Botswana, South Africa, Zimbabwe)


* Eastern Kalihari Karoo Basin (Botswana, Zimbabwe)
*Eastern Kalihari Karoo Basin (Botswana, Zimbabwe)


*Nata Karoo Sub-basin (Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe)
*Nata Karoo Sub-basin (Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe)
Line 601: Line 536:
*Medium Zambezi Aquifer (Zambia, Zimbabwe).
*Medium Zambezi Aquifer (Zambia, Zimbabwe).


For further information about transboundary aquifers, please see the [[Transboundary aquifers | Transboundary aquifers resources page]]
For further information about transboundary aquifers, please see the [[Transboundary aquifers | Transboundary aquifers resources page]].
 
 


=== Groundwater monitoring===
=== Groundwater monitoring===


The following summary is taken verbatim from the IGRAC report, “Groundwater Monitoring in the SADC Region” which was prepared for the Stockholm World Water Week in 2013 (IGRAC, 2013).
The following summary is taken verbatim from the IGRAC report, [https://www.un-igrac.org/dynamics/modules/SFIL0100/view.php?fil_Id=242 Groundwater Monitoring in the SADC Region], which was prepared for the Stockholm World Water Week in 2013 (IGRAC 2013).


'''National groundwater monitoring network'''
'''National groundwater monitoring network'''
Line 623: Line 554:
'''Challenges'''
'''Challenges'''


The main challenges encountered relate to lack of financial resources, logistical support and limited staff. Another challenge is related to vandalism of facilities by local communities. In certain instances, monitoring boreholes are clogged with debris making water level recording impossible. Specialised entrances for data loggers and locking mechanisms are currently being manufactured for monitoring boreholes in the Save Alluvial Aquifer. It is desired to revive both the chloride deposition and chemical surveillance programmes and to have telemetric (real time) data collection for the water level fluctuations.” (IGRAC, 2013).
The main challenges encountered relate to lack of financial resources, logistical support and limited staff. Another challenge is related to vandalism of facilities by local communities. In certain instances, monitoring boreholes are clogged with debris making water level recording impossible. Specialised entrances for data loggers and locking mechanisms are currently being manufactured for monitoring boreholes in the Save Alluvial Aquifer. It is desired to revive both the chloride deposition and chemical surveillance programmes and to have telemetric (real time) data collection for the water level fluctuations.” (IGRAC 2013).
 
==References==
 
Many of the references below, and others relating to the hydrogeology of Zimbabwe, can be accessed through the [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/atlas.cfc?method=listResults&title_search=&titleboolean=AND&author_search=&category=&child_category=&country=ZW Africa Groundwater Literature Archive].
 
 
===Online resources===
 
[https://ggis.un-igrac.org/ggis-viewer/viewer/sadcgip/public/default SADC Groundwater Information Portal]


[https://www.sadc.int/themes/natural-resources/water/ General information on surface water and groundwater resources in SADC]


==References==


===Geology: key references===
===Key Geology References===


Interconsult. 1985. National Master Plan for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation. Volume 22 Hydrogeology.  Ministry of Energy and Water Resources Development, Zimbabwe. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/sadc/fulldetails.cfm?id=ZW2024&country=Zimbabwe
Interconsult. 1985. [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/sadc/fulldetails.cfm?id=ZW2024&country=Zimbabwe National Master Plan for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation]. Volume 22 Hydrogeology.  Ministry of Energy and Water Resources Development, Zimbabwe.  


Zimbabwe Surveyor General. 1994.  Zimbabwe Geological and Mineral Resources Map, scale 1:1,000,000.  Surveyor General, Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe Surveyor General. 1994.  Zimbabwe Geological and Mineral Resources Map, scale 1:1,000,000.  Surveyor General, Zimbabwe.


Zimbabwe Geological Survey Bulletins
Zimbabwe Geological Survey Bulletins


===Hydrogeology: key references===


IGRAC.  2013.  Groundwater Monitoring in the SADC Region. Accessed at https://www.un-igrac.org/dynamics/modules/SFIL0100/view.php?fil_Id=242 on 09/06/2015.
===Key Hydrogeology References===
 
Chikodzi D. 2013. [https://www.omicsonline.org/scientific-reports/2157-7587-SR-629.pdf Groundwater resources of Zimbabwe: An assessment of fluctuations]. International Journal of Scientific Reports, 2, 629.   
 
Davies J and Burgess W G. 2014. [https://gwd.org.za/sites/gwd.org.za/files/04%20J%20Davies_%20Zimbabwe%20paper%20final.pdf Can groundwater sustain the future development of rural Zimbabwe?]
 
Derman B and Manzungu E. 2016. [https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol9/v9issue3/331-a9-3-8/file The complex politics of water and power in Zimbabwe: IWRM in the Catchment Councils of Manyame, Mazowe and Sanyati (1993-2001)]. Water Alternatives 9(3): 513-53.
 
Dube T. 2013. [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2346802 Emerging issues on the sustainability of the community based rural water resources management approach in Zimbabwe: A case study of Gwanda District].
 
Erpf K. 1998. [https://www.rural-water-supply.net/en/implementation/public-domain-handpumps/bush-pump The Bush Pump-the National Standard Handpump of Zimbabwe. A review by SKAT/HTN to find out what had made this pump so popular in Zimbabwe]. Skat, RWSN (incl. HTN), St Gallen, Switzerland. 
 
Hove T, Derman B and Manzungu, E. 2016. [https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol9/v9issue3/329-a9-3-10/file Land, farming and IWRM: A case study of the middle Manyame Sub-Catchment]. Water Alternatives 9(3): 531-548
 
IGRAC. 2013. [https://www.un-igrac.org/dynamics/modules/SFIL0100/view.php?fil_Id=242 Groundwater Monitoring in the SADC Region].
 
Interconsult. 1985. [https://www.bgs.ac.uk/sadc/fulldetails.cfm?id=ZW2024&country=Zimbabwe National Master Plan for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation]. Volume 22 Hydrogeology.  Ministry of Energy and Water Resources Development, Zimbabwe.
 
Morgan P and Chimbunde E. 1991. [https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/Morgan-1991-Upgrading.pdf  Upgrading family wells in Zimbabwe]. Waterlines, 9(3), 10-12.
 
Morgan P, Chimbunde E, Mtakwa N and Waterkeyn A. 1996. [https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/Morgan-1996-Now.pdf Now in my backyard—Zimbabwe's upgraded family well programme]. Waterlines, 14(4), 8-11.  


Interconsult.  1985. National Master Plan for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation. Volume 22 Hydrogeology. Ministry of Energy and Water Resources Development, Zimbabwe. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/sadc/fulldetails.cfm?id=ZW2024&country=Zimbabwe
Morgan P and Kanyemba A. 2012. [https://www.rural-water-supply.net/en/resources/details/468 A preliminary study of training artisans in upgradeable techniques for family owned wells]. Aquamor.  


UN-IGRAC. 2012. Transboundary aquifers of the world, update 2012. 1:50 000 000. Sepcial Edition for the 6th World Water Forum, Marseille.
Morgan P. 2015. [https://www.rural-water-supply.net/_ressources/documents/default/1-751-54-1456905931.pdf Self-Supply as a means of bringing water to the people of Zimbabwe and its relation to the hand pump program]. Aquamor


===Other references===
Rusinga F and Taigbenu  AE. 2005. Groundwater resource evaluation of urban Bulawayo aquifer. Water SA Vol. 31 No. 1 January 2005. ISSN 0378-4738.
Rusinga F. and Taigbenu  A. E. Groundwater resource evaluation of urban Bulawayo aquifer. Water SA Vol. 31 No. 1 January 2005. ISSN 0378-4738.


Sunguro, S., Beekman, H. E., Erbel, K., 2000. Groundwater regulations and guidelines: crucial components of integrated catchment management in Zimbabwe. “1st WARFSA/WaterNet Symposium: Sustainable Use of Water Resources; Maputo 1-2 November 2000”.
Sunguro S, Beekman HE and Erbel K. 2000. Groundwater regulations and guidelines: crucial components of integrated catchment management in Zimbabwe. “1st WARFSA/WaterNet Symposium: Sustainable Use of Water Resources; Maputo 1-2 November 2000”.


Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency. 2012. Zimbabwe Population Census, 2012.
UN-IGRAC. 2012. Transboundary aquifers of the world, update 2012. 1:50 000 000. Sepcial Edition for the 6th World Water Forum, Marseille.


===African Groundwater Literature Archive (AGLA) references===
Water and Sanitation Program. 2011.  [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/17762/7241500REPLACE0PUBLIC00CSO0Zimbabwe.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y  Water Supply and Sanitation in Zimbabwe Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and Beyond. An AMCOW Country Status Overview].


For more references for the hydrogeology of Zimbabwe please visit the [https://bgs.ac.uk/africagroundwateratlas/searchResults.cfm?country_search=ZW African Groundwater Literature Archive's Zimbabwe page].
Zimstat. 2016. [https://www.zimstat.co.zw/sites/default/files/img/Environmental%20Report%202016_2.pdf United Nations Zimbabwe Water And Waste Statistics Report 2016]  


===Other references===
 
Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency. 2012. Zimbabwe Population Census, 2012.




==Return to the index pages==


[[Overview of Africa Groundwater Atlas | Africa Groundwater Atlas]] >> [[Hydrogeology by country | Hydrogeology by country]] >> Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe
Return to the index pages:
[[Overview of Africa Groundwater Atlas | Africa Groundwater Atlas]] >> [[Hydrogeology by country | Hydrogeology by country]]


<!--        PLEASE DO NOT DELETE BELOW THIS LINE        -->
<!--        PLEASE DO NOT DELETE BELOW THIS LINE        -->


[[Category:Hydrogeology by country|z]]
[[Category:Hydrogeology by country|z]]
[[Category:Africa Groundwater Atlas]]

Revision as of 11:18, 7 January 2020

Africa Groundwater Atlas >> Hydrogeology by country >> Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

The area of present-day Zimbabwe has been the site of several organised states and kingdoms since the 11th century, as well as a major migration and trade route. It came under colonial British rule in the late 19th century, declaring unilateral independence in 1965. Over the next 15 years there was internal conflict between guerrilla forces and the predominantly white independent Rhodesian government. A 1979 settlement led to elections and the establishment of a biracial democracy, and following formally agreed independence from Britain in 1980, Robert Mugabe was elected head of state. Zimbabwe continued to experience interlinked economic, social and political difficulties, as well as natural pressures such as drought, and has high levels of poverty and poor health, low life expectancy. A particular issue was land redistribution, which after 2000 radically changed land ownership away from the minority white population who owned 70% of the most productive agricultural land, to black farmers. International sanctions in response to government policies has had significant impact on the country. The effective collapse of the economy was one factor leading to the relatively peaceful ousting in 2017 of Robert Mugabe after 37 years.

Minerals (particularly gold but also including platinum and diamonds) are Zimbabwe’s main foreign exports. Although the mining sector is very lucrative, corruption means that much revenue is lost to the state. Land distribution damaged the agricultural sector, once a source of export revenue, and today Zimbabwe is a net importer of food products. However, there have been recent improvements in the number of smallholders practising conservation agriculture and in crop yields. Tourism is also important, but has declined since 2000, today contributing around 8% of GDP. Zimbabwe saw hyperinflaction from 2000, and in 2016 the government allowed trade to take place in US dollars and other hard currencies rather than the Zimbabwe dollar.

With relatively low rainfall and unequally distributed surface water resources, groundwater is the main drinking water source in rural areas. Groundwater is also used for irrigation on some commercial as well as smallholder farms. Groundwater is also used to supply some urban water supply systems. However, despite its widespread use, groundwater contributes not more than 10% of total water use.


Authors

Daina Mudimbu, Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe

Dr Richard Owen, Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, P.O Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe

Emily Crane, Kirsty Upton, Brighid Ó Dochartaigh, British Geological Survey, UK

Imogen Bellwood-Howard, Institute of Development Studies, UK

Please cite this page as: Mudimbo, Owen, Crane, Upton, Ó Dochartaigh and Bellwood-Howard, 2018.

Bibliographic reference: Mudimbo, D., Owen, R., Crane, E., Upton, K., Ó Dochartaigh, B.É. and Bellwood-Howard, I. 2018. Africa Groundwater Atlas: Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe. British Geological Survey. Accessed [date you accessed the information]. https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Hydrogeology_of_Zimbabwe

Terms and conditions

The Africa Groundwater Atlas is hosted by the British Geological Survey (BGS) and includes information from third party sources. Your use of information provided by this website is at your own risk. If reproducing diagrams that include third party information, please cite both the Africa Groundwater Atlas and the third party sources. Please see the Terms of use for more information.

Geographical Setting

Most of the country forms part of the central plateau, at an elevation of between 1200 and 1600 m. The east is mountainous, with the highest point at Mount Nyangani at 2592 m.

Zimbabwe. Map developed from USGS GTOPOPO30; GADM global administrative areas; and UN Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. For more information on the map development and datasets see the geography resources section.


General

Capital city Harare
Region Eastern Africa
Border countries Mozambique, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia
Total surface area* 390,760 km2 (39,076,000 ha)
Total population (2015)* 15,603,000
Rural population (2015)* 10,732,000 (69%)
Urban population (2015)* 4,871,000 (31%)
UN Human Development Index (HDI) [highest = 1] (2014)* 0.5087

* Source: FAO Aquastat


Climate

Zimbabwe has a tropical climate, with a dry season in which little rain falls, and a rainy season that usually lasts from late October to March. Local climate is moderated by altitude. Rainfall is lowest (less than 500 mm/year) in the south and southwest; between 600 and approximately 1000 mm/year across much of the centre of the country; and only exceeds 1000 mm/year in the mountains of the east.

Koppen Geiger Climate ZonesAverage Annual PrecipitationAverage Temperature

Average monthly precipitation for Zimbabwe showing minimum and maximum (light blue), 25th and 75th percentile (blue), and median (dark blue) rainfall Average monthly temperature for Zimbabwe showing minimum and maximum (orange), 25th and 75th percentile (red), and median (black) temperature Quarterly precipitation over the period 1950-2012 Monthly precipitation (blue) over the period 2000-2012 compared with the long term monthly average (red)

More information on average rainfall and temperature for each of the climate zones in Zimbabwe can be seen at the Zimbabwe climate page.

These maps and graphs were developed from the CRU TS 3.21 dataset produced by the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK. For more information see the climate resource page.

Surface water

The four largest rivers in Zimbabwe are the Zambezi, Limpopo, Save and Pungwe. These are all transboundary rivers, which flow to the Indian Ocean. Two major smaller rivers are the Thuli and Mzingwane, which are tributaries of larger transboundary rivers.

The Zimbabwe National Water Authority Hydrology Department manages information relating to surface water resources availability.





Major surface water features of Zimbabwe. Map developed from World Wildlife Fund HydroSHEDS; Digital Chart of the World drainage; and FAO Inland Water Bodies. For more information on map development and datasets see the surface water resource page.


Soil

Soil Map of Zimbabwe, from the European Commission Joint Research Centre: European Soil Portal. For more information on the map see the soil resource page.


Land cover

Most of the country is covered by savannah vegetation, with the wetter mountainous east supporting tropical evergreen and hardwood forests.


Land Cover Map of Zimbabwe, from the European Space Agency GlobCover 2.3, 2009. For more information on the map see the land cover resource page.

Water statistics

1999 2002 2007 2012 2014 2015
Rural population with access to safe drinking water (%) 67.3
Urban population with access to safe drinking water (%) 97
Population affected by water related disease No data No data No data No data No data No data
Total internal renewable water resources (cubic metres/inhabitant/year) 785.7
Total exploitable water resources (Million cubic metres/year) No data No data No data No data No data No data
Freshwater withdrawal as % of total renewable water resources 17.85
Total renewable groundwater (Million cubic metres/year) 6,000
Exploitable: Regular renewable groundwater (Million cubic metres/year) 1,500
Groundwater produced internally (Million cubic metres/year) 6,000
Fresh groundwater withdrawal (primary and secondary) (Million cubic metres/year) 420
Groundwater: entering the country (total) (Million cubic metres/year)
Groundwater: leaving the country to other countries (total) (Million cubic metres/year)
Industrial water withdrawal (all water sources) (Million cubic metres/year) 215
Municipal water withdrawal (all water sources) (Million cubic metres/year) 425
Agricultural water withdrawal (all water sources) (Million cubic metres/year) 2,930
Irrigation water withdrawal (all water sources)1 (Million cubic metres/year) No data No data No data No data No data No data
Irrigation water requirement (all water sources)1 (Million cubic metres/year) 836
Area of permanent crops (ha) 100,000
Cultivated land (arable and permanent crops) (ha) 4,100,000
Total area of country cultivated (%)
Area equipped for irrigation by groundwater (ha) 20,000
Area equipped for irrigation by mixed surface water and groundwater (ha) No data No data No data No data No data No data

These statistics are sourced from FAO Aquastat. More information on the derivation and interpretation of these statistics can be seen on the FAO Aquastat website.

Further water and related statistics can be accessed at the Aquastat Main Database.

1 More information on irrigation water use and requirement statistics

Geology

This section provides a summary of the geology of Zimbabwe. More detail can be found in the references listed at the bottom of this page. Many of these references can be accessed through the Africa Groundwater Literature Archive.

The geology map on this page shows a simplified overview of the geology at a national scale (see the Geology resource page for more details).

Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map.

Geology of Zimbabwe at 1:5 million scale. Based on map described by Persits et al. 2002/Furon and Lombard 1964. For more information on the map development and datasets see the geology resource page. Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map.


Geological Environments
Key Formations Period Lithology Structure
Unconsolidated sedimentary
Quaternary (Pleistocene to Recent) Unconsolidated sedimentary sequences of alluvial clay, sand and gravel of varying thickness in the river valleys. There are reported alluvium thicknesses of up to 70-80 m in Sabi Valley, and 45 m in the Zambezi Valley. Elsewhere, the unconsolidated deposits are generally less than 25 m thick.
Sedimentary Kalahari Basin
Lower Pipe Sandstone and Kalahari Sand. Tertiary and Quaternary The Pipe Sandstone is composed of buff or pink sands. It is unconsolidated in places; in others it is weakly cemented by silica, and traversed by numerous hollow pipes; and in some places it is cemented into a hard secondary quartzite or silcrete.

The Kalahari Sand comprises pink or buff coloured, structureless, aeolian sand with a high proportion of fine silt.

Approximately 44000 km² of western Zimbabwe is covered by unconsolidated Kalahari Sands. In places, the thickness of the sand is in excess of 100 m.
Sedimentary – Cretaceous-Tertiary
Cretaceous sedimentary Mudstones, fine grained arkose, grit-conglomerate and sandstone bands
Igneous - Upper Karoo Basalt
Upper Karoo Batoka Basalts Triassic The Batoka basalts comprise amygdaloidal lava flows with interbedded tufa horizons.
Sedimentary – Mesozoic-Palaeozoic (Upper and Lower Karoo)
Upper and Lower Karoo Carboniferous to Permian These arenaceous and argillaceous sequences are conventionally subdivided into the Upper and Lower Karoo. The Upper Karoo comprises the Forest Sandstone and the Escarpment Grit. The Lower Karoo consists of the Madumabisa Mudstone and the Upper and Lower Wankie Hwange Sandstone.

This thick series of alternating sandstones, siltstones and mudstone is overlain by the Upper Karoo Batoka basalts (see above).

Igneous intrusive (Great Dyke)
Great Dyke Late Precambrian The Great Dyke is a large linear mafic-ultramafic intrusive feature composed of norite, gabbro and anorthosite. Up to 1000 m thick
Precambrian Metasediments
Umkondo Group; Deweras, Lomagundi and Piriwiri formations (all part of the Magondi orogenic belt); Sijarira and Tengwe River groups. Mid to Late Precambrian (Proterozoic) These Precambrian metasedimentary rocks include shales, phyllites, quartzites, siltstones, sandstones, conglomerates, limestones and dolomites as well as minor basic metavolcanics. The Deweras, Lomagundi and Piriwiri formations are all part of the Magondi orogenic belt. The Piriwiri Formation comprises phyllites with subordinate quartzites. The Lomagundi Formation comprises slates and shales with minor quartzites. The Tengwe River Group comprises shales. The Sijarira Group comprises shales, siltstones and fine grained sandstones.
Precambrian Basement Complex and Metavolcanics
Precambrian Basement Complex with belts of metavolcanics and greenstones, including the Sebakwean, Belingwean, Bulawayan and Shamvaian supergroups. Early Precambrian / Archaean The Basement Complex covers at least 60% of the country area, including a large portion of central Zimbabwe. It is characterised by vast areas of gneissose rocks into which younger granite bodies of various sizes have been intruded, including Proterozoic granites, and granodiorites, adamellites and tonalites of the Younger Intrusive Granites.

The Basement Complex contains irregularly shaped bodies of greenstone material, making up mineralised greenstone/gold belts, which also contain metavolcanics and minor metasediments. Other linear belts are formed by dolerites and sheets of dolerite composition trending in various directions across the Basement Complex area.

The Limpopo and Zambezi Mobile Belts are zones of deformed and metamorphosed rocks with a SSW-NNE trend in the south of the country, and a NW-SE trend across the north of Zimbabwe and into Zambia. They comprise paragneisses and anorthosite gneisses.

Different weathering thicknesses occurs in the Basement Complex, distinguished by different erosional surfaces. Weathering thicknesses range from greater than 30 to 35 m on the African erosional surface, to shallow, less than 30 m on the Post African and Pliocene/Quaternary surfaces.

Moderate to deep weathering occurs within the Greenstone Belts.

Hydrogeology

This section provides a summary of the hydrogeology of the main aquifers in Zimbabwe. More information is available in the references listed at the bottom of this page. Many of these references can be accessed through the Africa Groundwater Literature Archive.

The hydrogeology map on this page shows a simplified overview of the type and productivity of the main aquifers at a national scale (see the Hydrogeology map resource page for more details).

Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map.

Zimbabwe is also covered by the SADC hydrogeological map and atlas (2010), available through the SADC Groundwater Information Portal.

Hydrogeology of Zimbabwe at 1:5 million scale. For more information on how the map was developed see the hydrogeology map resource page. Download a GIS shapefile of the Zimbabwe geology and hydrogeology map.

.


Groundwater development potential

In the National Master Plan for Rural Supply, Interconsult (1986) classed aquifers in Zimbabwe by their groundwater development potential, as follows:

  • High: Suitable for primary supply, piped supplies, and small and large-scale irrigation schemes
  • Moderate: Suitable for primary supplies, small piped schemes and small-scale irrigation schemes
  • Low: Suitable for primary supplied from boreholes.

These groundwater development potential rankings are reflected in the hydrogeology map above, with a description of the aquifer type (hydrogeological environent) of each aquifer.

Unconsolidated

Named Aquifers General Description Water quality issues
Save Alluvial Aquifer, Umzingwane Alluvial aquifer, Grootvlei/Limpopo (transboundary) Alluvial deposits are only locally developed within Zimbabwe, with the largest occurrences found in the Save (Sabi)- Limpopo river system and major tributaries; along the Zambezi River; and along the Munyati and Sessami rivers in the northwest. The alluvial deposits vary in thickness, being generally less than 25 m in most areas, but as much as 45 m in the Zambezi Valley and up to 70 m in the Sabi Valley. Where thick and permeable enough, they can form unconfined aquifers with high groundwater development potential.

Aquifer properties are extremely variable and may range from locally low to locally high average hydraulic conductivity. The water table ranges from about 5 - 40 m deep, but is generally over 20 m deep.

Boreholes in the alluvial deposits are typically 20 – 70 m deep, and provide yields of 100-5000 m³/d.

Water quality is generally good. Lenses of brackish water occur in the alluvium of the Sabi river, which may be fossil water and/or water recharging via the adjacent Karoo strata.
Kalahari Sands The Kalahari Sands aquifer is mainly unconsolidated, but also include the consolidated Pipe Sandstone. It forms an unconfined aquifer with high groundwater development potential. Boreholes in the Kalahari Sands are commonly 70 – 100 m deep, and provide yields of 100-1000 m³/d. The aquifer properties of the Kalahari Sands are extremely variable and may range from locally low to locally high average hydraulic conditions. The water table is generally over 20 m deep.

Igneous - Fracture Flow

Named Aquifers General Description Water quality issues
Igneous – Karoo Basalt Aquifers in the Karoo volcanic rocks are limited to discrete zones of weathering, fracturing and jointing, and contact zones with underlying Forest Sandstone and interbedded sandstone. Wide sheets of basalt occur in the Victoria Falls and Nyamamdhlovu, and Beitbridge and Chiredzi areas with numerous smaller remnants forming high lying cappings in the Gokwe area. Where suitably weathered, they have moderate groundwater development potential. The aquifers are unconfined, and have variable transmissivity from about 9 to 90 m2/d, and specific capacity values of the order of 1 to 10 m3/d/m.

The water table is usually less than 15 m depth, and borehole depths average 50 m, varying from about 40 to 60 m. Borehole yields vary from 10 to 250 m3/d.

The quality of groundwater in the basalts is good, with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations normally below 1000 mg/l. There is no identified fluoride hazard, although it may pose a mild encrustation hazard in places.

Sedimentary - Intergranular Flow

Named Aquifers General Description Water quality issues
Cretaceous Sedimentary The aquifer properties of these sedimentary rocks are controlled by primary porosity and permeability. The more favourable horizons are the conglomerates and cleaner sandstones, particularly in the vicinity of rivers. However, overall these aquifers have low groundwater development potential.

Water tables are typically less than 15 m deep, and boreholes are usually drilled to 70 – 100 m depth. Transmissivity is usually less than 1.5 m2/d, and specific capacity below 10 m3/d/m.

Water quality is moderate to good with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations ranging from less than 1000 mg/l to 2000 mg/l. The water poses a potential encrustation hazard.

Sedimentary - Intergranular & Fracture Flow (Karoo Sequence)

Named Aquifers General Description Water quality issues
Nyamandhlovu Forest Sandstone aquifers (Karoo) The Forest Sandstone is widely developed in the Hwange – Zambezi Basin and constitutes an important regional aquifer, with high groundwater development potential. It is mainly confined, being unconfined only close to outcrop. Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels sometimes less than 10 m depth but more commonly greater than 20 m depth. Yields range from 0.1 to 5.9 l/s.

Recharge estimates indicate an annual recharge of 105.5 mm with 38.4%, 52.1% and 9.5% accounting respectively for direct recharge, water mains and sewer leakages (Rusinga and Taigbenu 2005).

Water quality is generally good with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration below 1000 mg/l. There is no recognised fluoride threat, although it may pose a mild encrustation hazard.
Escarpment Grit The Escarpment Grit forms a confined aquifer in the Hwange and Save-Limpopo basin, with a high groundwater development potential. Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels about 10 – 15 m and greater than 20 m depth respectively. Yields range from 1.2 to 3.5 l/s.
Madumabisa Mudstone The Madumabisa Mudstone is associated with shallow weathering, but has low groundwater development potential. Boreholes are typically 30 – 100 m deep, with water levels about 10 – 15 m and greater than 20 m depth respectively. Yields are relatively low in the Madumabisa Mudstone (0.1 - 0.6 l/s); successful boreholes are usually sited in the vicinity of rivers.
Upper and Lower Hwange (Wankie) Sandstone The Upper and Lower Hwange Sandstone is widespread in the Karoo basin and has high groundwater development potential. It is found at depth and the aquifer is always confined. It was previously known as the Wankie Sandstone. Boreholes are usually 100 – 150 m deep in the Upper and Lower Hwange Sandstones. Yields range from 1.2 to 5.8 l/s.

Sedimentary – Fracture flow (including karst)

Named Aquifers General Description Water quality issues
Precambrian Metasediments - Lomagundi Dolomite and Tengwe River Formation Some water-bearing horizons exist within the Precambrian metasediments. Aquifers exist primarily due to karst features in the calcareous rocks of the Tengwe River and Lomagundi Dolomite formations (massive dolomites and limestones). Karst features are thought to be developed to an average depth of approximately 60 -70 m. Weathering of shaley horizons in the limestones also increases the potential for groundwater storage and flow.

The Lomagundi Dolomite has high groundwater development potential. Average specific capacity of boreholes is 505 m3/d/m. Typical borehole depths are 60 to 80 m . The water level varies from ground level at spring occurrences to 50 m depth, depending on land use (commercial or subsistence farming).

The Tengwe River Formation has moderate groundwater development potential. Borehole specific capacity is 4 to 120 m3/d/m. Typical borehole depths are 50 – 70 m. Water levels tend to be generally shallow (about 10 m) in the area of Tengwe limestone/shaley limestone.

Yields of 500 - >2000 m3/d are possible.

Water quality in the Lomagundi Dolomite is generally very good with a slightly hard calcium/magnesium character. Water quality in the Tengwe River Formation is generally very good with a slightly hard calcium/magnesium character.

Basement Complex and Metavolcanics, including the Great Dyke

Named Aquifers General Description Water quality issues
Precambrian Basement Complex The gneissose rocks and intrusive granites of the Basement Complex are devoid of any primary porosity, so the aquifer properties of these basement rocks are controlled by the degree of secondary porosity and permeability, often associated with fracturing, jointing, schistosity planes and weathering. Two hydrogeological sub-units are recognized, each with characteristic groundwater occurrence:

- the granite and gneiss below the African erosion surface; and

- the granite and gneiss below the Post-African and Pliocene Quaternary erosion surfaces.

These aquifers have low groundwater development potential. The highest groundwater development potential is found in those areas possessing the deepest and most aerially extensive weathering as in the larger African surface. Chemical weathering along faults, shear zones and dyke contacts may produce equally important water bearing structures.

Incorrectly sited boreholes may fail during the dry season.

Granite and gneiss below the African erosion surface Rocks beneath the African erosion surface have relatively well developed hydraulic properties resulting from extensive weathering, which generally exceeds 30 - 35 m in depth. Aquifer thickness is about 30 to 50 metres; boreholes are usually drilled to 40 – 50 m depth. Sustainable borehole yields are in the region of 50 - 100 m3/d. Here, transmissivity is low to moderate (<10 m2/d) and specific capacity is moderate (30-50 m3/d/m). Groundwater in the aquifers beneath the African erosion surface is generally of good quality with a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration below 1000 mg/l and no recorded fluoride hazard.


Granite and gneiss below the Post-African and Pliocene Quaternary erosion surfaces The hydraulic properties of the rocks beneath the Post-African and Pliocene-Quaternary erosion surfaces are considerably less well developed. Areas of weathering tend to be patchy and shallow (10 - 30 m). Aquifer thickness is about 10 to 30 m, often less than 15 m. Boreholes are typically 30 – 40 m depth. The transmissivity of these rocks is low (1 – 10 m2/d), while boreholes have low to moderately low specific capacity of the order 2 – 20 m3/d/m.

Areas of granite and gneiss pavement, very shallow bedrock and inselbergs and other features producing positive relief common in the Post-African and Pliocene/Quaternary surfaces are associated with marginal to nil groundwater resources.

In aquifers associated with the Post-African and Pliocene/Quaternary surface the groundwater quality is generally good. TDS is usually below 1000 mg/l, however it is higher in the Beitbridge and Nuanesti area (TDS of 1000 to 2000 mg/l) where there is also a fluoride hazard.
Greenstone belts, including the Bulawayan Supergroup The rocks of the Greenstone belts generally have very low permeability, but groundwater occurs where fracturing and weathering have created adequate porosity and permeability, and consequently this aquifer has high groundwater development potential. The Bulawayan Supergroup can support yields of 1.2 - 2.9 l/s (Interconsult 1986). The average borehole depth is in the range 30 - 50 m, and the water level is typically from 5 to greater than 20 m below ground level.

Groundwater Status

Groundwater quantity

Overall, all the hydrogeological units in Zimbabwe are suitable for the development of small, single point primary water supplies, either by means of dug wells or by boreholes. Units classified as possessing moderate or high groundwater development potential are capable of supporting more extensive exploitation for piped water supplies and irrigation schemes (Interconsult 1985).

Groundwater quality

The groundwater quality throughout Zimbabwe is usually good and generally does not pose any constraint to use for human consumption. Of the constituents that are a threat to health, the few cases of high nitrate are ascribed to poor borehole construction.

High fluoride is found in isolated pockets in the Gokwe area and appear to be associated with the outcrop area of the Wankie (Hwange) Sandstone. At the regional scale, fluoride concentrations are not a constraint to exploitation (Interconsult 1985).

Groundwater use and management

Groundwater use

Groundwater is the main drinking water source in rural parts of Zimbabwe. According to the 2012 census, about 38% of a total of 3,059,016 Zimbabwean households fetched their water from boreholes and protected wells (Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency 2012). The total annual abstraction of groundwater in the rural areas, from an estimated 40,000 boreholes, is estimated at 35 x 10 6 m³.

In addition to domestic use in rural and urban areas, groundwater supplies agriculture and industry in Zimbabwe. The total groundwater abstraction for the agricultural sector is estimated at 350 x 10 6 m³. Groundwater is also abstracted for emerging towns known as Growth Points (e.g. Gokwe), urban centres (e.g. Bulawayo) and rural institutions (e.g. schools, health and business centres).

Overall, groundwater presently contributes not more than 10% to the total water use in Zimbabwe (Sunguro et al. 2000).

Groundwater source types

In rural areas, water is mainly abstracted by boreholes fitted with a hand pump, due to limited electrification. The standard hand pump in Zimbabwe has traditionally been the unique ‘Zimbabwe bush pump’, which is relatively robust, but a lack of maintenance and support of all water supply infrastructure has led to increasing levels of failure.

Electric borehole pumps are more common in urban areas, although there has been an increase in the number of private urban boreholes where there is inadequate municipal water supply infrastructure.

Groundwater management

The Ministry of Environment, Water and Climate Resources is responsible for the formulation and implementation of sustainable policies regarding the development, utilisation and management of water resources in cooperation with user communities and institutions.

The Water Act (1998) established the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA), a parastatal tasked with providing a framework for the development, management, utilisation and conservation of the country’s water resources through a coordinated approach. ZINWA has a groundwater branch tasked with specifically looking into the management of the national groundwater resources.

The Water Act also specifies the establishment of Catchment Councils. Seven catchment councils were established in the major hydrological zones of the country, with functions covering both groundwater and surface water, including: preparing an outline plan for river systems, determining applications and granting water permits, regulating and supervising the use of water, supervising the performance of functions by Sub-catchment Councils, and dealing with conflicts over water. However, due to the limited capacity and lack of adequate information regarding the quantity of groundwater, groundwater resource management poses a challenge to the councils.

Recent developments in the major cities have seen a collapse in municipal water treatment and distribution systems, with a shift towards the private use of groundwater at household and even industrial levels. There has been a rise in bulk water suppliers abstracting huge volumes of groundwater. This has led to new challenges in dealing with conflict over falling groundwater levels in residential areas, which the catchment councils have inadequate capacity to deal with.

In addition to the Water Act (1998), groundwater regulations and guidelines were developed for Zimbabwe in 1999 to control groundwater development and management. The regulations and guidelines compliment the Water Act (1998) and have been formulated within a framework of integrated water resources management (IWRM).

Transboundary aquifers

Zimbabwe has five transboundary aquifers as detailed by UN-IGRAC (2012):

  • Limpopo Basin (Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe)
  • Tuli Karoo Sub-basin (Botswana, South Africa, Zimbabwe)
  • Eastern Kalihari Karoo Basin (Botswana, Zimbabwe)
  • Nata Karoo Sub-basin (Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe)
  • Medium Zambezi Aquifer (Zambia, Zimbabwe).

For further information about transboundary aquifers, please see the Transboundary aquifers resources page.

Groundwater monitoring

The following summary is taken verbatim from the IGRAC report, Groundwater Monitoring in the SADC Region, which was prepared for the Stockholm World Water Week in 2013 (IGRAC 2013).

National groundwater monitoring network

“Groundwater resources management is carried out by the Groundwater Department of the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA). ZINWA is a parastatal under the Ministry of Water Resources Development and Management. Monitoring of groundwater level fluctuation is currently confined to only three major aquifers. These are the Lomagundi Dolomite Aquifer situated in the north western part of the country, the Nyamadlovu Sandstone Aquifer situated in the south western part of the country and the Save Alluvial Aquifer located in the south eastern part of the country.

Water levels are measured using data loggers and readings are collected monthly. Chloride deposition has been monitored in six monitoring stations throughout the country but has been discontinued due to lack of funds. The information was used in the assessment of groundwater recharge rates. The Department also used to carry out chemical surveillance on groundwater and surface water but again the programme was suspended due to lack of resources.

Data management and assessment

Groundwater fluctuation levels are recorded on template sheets during the last week of the month by field observers who send the records to the main office in Harare. The data is recorded in Excel and an initial quality control exercise is performed. The data is then reformatted and importated into a national groundwater database called Hydro GeoAnalyst. The software has proven to be quite versatile and meeting the needs of ZINWA. Hydrographs and groundwater maps are produced which assist in overall groundwater development and management.

Challenges

The main challenges encountered relate to lack of financial resources, logistical support and limited staff. Another challenge is related to vandalism of facilities by local communities. In certain instances, monitoring boreholes are clogged with debris making water level recording impossible. Specialised entrances for data loggers and locking mechanisms are currently being manufactured for monitoring boreholes in the Save Alluvial Aquifer. It is desired to revive both the chloride deposition and chemical surveillance programmes and to have telemetric (real time) data collection for the water level fluctuations.” (IGRAC 2013).

References

Many of the references below, and others relating to the hydrogeology of Zimbabwe, can be accessed through the Africa Groundwater Literature Archive.


Online resources

SADC Groundwater Information Portal

General information on surface water and groundwater resources in SADC


Key Geology References

Interconsult. 1985. National Master Plan for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation. Volume 22 Hydrogeology. Ministry of Energy and Water Resources Development, Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe Surveyor General. 1994. Zimbabwe Geological and Mineral Resources Map, scale 1:1,000,000. Surveyor General, Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe Geological Survey Bulletins


Key Hydrogeology References

Chikodzi D. 2013. Groundwater resources of Zimbabwe: An assessment of fluctuations. International Journal of Scientific Reports, 2, 629.

Davies J and Burgess W G. 2014. Can groundwater sustain the future development of rural Zimbabwe?

Derman B and Manzungu E. 2016. The complex politics of water and power in Zimbabwe: IWRM in the Catchment Councils of Manyame, Mazowe and Sanyati (1993-2001). Water Alternatives 9(3): 513-53.

Dube T. 2013. Emerging issues on the sustainability of the community based rural water resources management approach in Zimbabwe: A case study of Gwanda District.

Erpf K. 1998. The Bush Pump-the National Standard Handpump of Zimbabwe. A review by SKAT/HTN to find out what had made this pump so popular in Zimbabwe. Skat, RWSN (incl. HTN), St Gallen, Switzerland.

Hove T, Derman B and Manzungu, E. 2016. Land, farming and IWRM: A case study of the middle Manyame Sub-Catchment. Water Alternatives 9(3): 531-548

IGRAC. 2013. Groundwater Monitoring in the SADC Region.

Interconsult. 1985. National Master Plan for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation. Volume 22 Hydrogeology. Ministry of Energy and Water Resources Development, Zimbabwe.

Morgan P and Chimbunde E. 1991. Upgrading family wells in Zimbabwe. Waterlines, 9(3), 10-12.

Morgan P, Chimbunde E, Mtakwa N and Waterkeyn A. 1996. Now in my backyard—Zimbabwe's upgraded family well programme. Waterlines, 14(4), 8-11.

Morgan P and Kanyemba A. 2012. A preliminary study of training artisans in upgradeable techniques for family owned wells. Aquamor.

Morgan P. 2015. Self-Supply as a means of bringing water to the people of Zimbabwe and its relation to the hand pump program. Aquamor

Rusinga F and Taigbenu AE. 2005. Groundwater resource evaluation of urban Bulawayo aquifer. Water SA Vol. 31 No. 1 January 2005. ISSN 0378-4738.

Sunguro S, Beekman HE and Erbel K. 2000. Groundwater regulations and guidelines: crucial components of integrated catchment management in Zimbabwe. “1st WARFSA/WaterNet Symposium: Sustainable Use of Water Resources; Maputo 1-2 November 2000”.

UN-IGRAC. 2012. Transboundary aquifers of the world, update 2012. 1:50 000 000. Sepcial Edition for the 6th World Water Forum, Marseille.

Water and Sanitation Program. 2011. Water Supply and Sanitation in Zimbabwe Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and Beyond. An AMCOW Country Status Overview.

Zimstat. 2016. United Nations Zimbabwe Water And Waste Statistics Report 2016

Other references

Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency. 2012. Zimbabwe Population Census, 2012.


Return to the index pages: Africa Groundwater Atlas >> Hydrogeology by country