<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lmo</id>
	<title>MediaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lmo"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Special:Contributions/Lmo"/>
	<updated>2026-06-04T01:46:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:P915249.png&amp;diff=21792</id>
		<title>File:P915249.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:P915249.png&amp;diff=21792"/>
		<updated>2015-09-18T09:10:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: Lmo uploaded a new version of File:P915249.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=={{int:filedesc}}==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Information&lt;br /&gt;
|description={{en|1=Solid geology of the district.. From: Figure 2 in MERRITT, J W, AUTON, C A, CONNELL, E R, HALL, A M, and PEACOCK, J D. 2003. Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).}}&lt;br /&gt;
|date=2015-07-11 19:04:21&lt;br /&gt;
|source=British Geological Survey&lt;br /&gt;
|author=British Geological Survey&lt;br /&gt;
|permission=&lt;br /&gt;
|other versions=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=={{int:license-header}}==&lt;br /&gt;
{{subst:Custom license marker added by UW}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{BGS}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Nether_Daugh,_Kintore_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21754</id>
		<title>Nether Daugh, Kintore - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Nether_Daugh,_Kintore_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21754"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T09:28:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Nether Daugh, Kintore =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915378.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 76E Inverurie. P915378.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Fine-grained sediments, containing the remains of plants and insects, recovered from pits excavated in the floodplain of the River Don, provide an insight into the type of environmental change that affected river catchments in north-east Scotland during the late Holocene. In particular, they suggest that aggradation of fine-grained alluvial sediments, which infill abandoned river channels, may have resulted, at least in part, from soil erosion initiated by deforestation and the development of early agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915324.png|left|thumbnail|Lithostratigraphy at the Nether Daugh site. P915324.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Nether Daugh site (NJ 800 160) lies at the foot of a terrace, adjacent to an abandoned meander cut-off, in the Don valley east of Kintore, on Sheet 76E ([[Media:P915324.png|P915324]], [[Media:P915378.png|P915378]]). This part of the Don valley is infilled by at least 16.2 m of sandy silt, with up to 5 m of laminated micaceous brown and grey sandy silt, passing up into olive-green and olive-brown unlaminated silt. These silts underlie up to 4 m of sand and gravel, which is capped by up to 2 m of fine-grained alluvium and soil (Auton and Crofts, 1986; Aitken, 1991). The silts are interpreted as sediments that were laid down in a lake, ponded at the Mill of Dyce (see Site 18 [[Mill of Dyce - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Mill of Dyce]]) and which drained away after 11 550 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP (Auton and Crofts, 1986; Aitken, 1991, 1995). The uppermost parts of the silt sequence may contain organic matter, but its presence has not been confirmed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BGS Borehole NJ 81 NW3 (Auton and Crofts, 1986) drilled at Nether Daugh proved 0.2 m of ‘peat’ approximately 2 m below the base of the fine-grained floodplain alluvium. Two further boreholes ([[Media:P915324.png|P915324]] boreholes 1 and 2) (NJ 8003 1600 and NJ 8002 1599, respectively), were drilled at the site in December 1986 (information from J Maizels and R Gunson, University of Aberdeen, 1986). Borehole 1 confirmed the presence of an organic interval, comprising 1.1 m of grey, organic mud, overlain by 0.5 m of grey sand with branches and twigs of &#039;&#039;Betula&#039;&#039;, and overlain in turn by 1.6 m of grey, organic sand. Subsequently, two pits were dug by mechanical excavator, in February 1988, in order to obtain samples of the organic material for palaeoecological analyses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stratigraphy of the two pits and the three boreholes from the site are similar (Aitken, 1991) and is summarised in [[Media:P915324.png|P915324]]. Both pits contained an organic unit at least 10 to 20 cm thick, overlying fine-grained silty sand and overlain by 4.0 to 4.5 m of clay and grey pebbly sands. The organic remains in Pit 1 (NJ 8002 1597) comprised twigs, branches, bark, leaves and seeds in a matrix of grey, silty clay. The upper part of the organic unit in Pit 2 (NJ 8004 1603) contained a higher proportion of organic matter. It comprised woody peat, with thin sand laminations that contained plant macrofossils and insect fragments, again within a grey, silty clay matrix. These organic sediments are interpreted as part of a late Holocene channel fill succession (Aitken, 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:right; margin-left: 10px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Pollen count from the Nether Daugh Pits&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Percentage total dry land pollen&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! ||Pit 1||Pit 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Betula&#039;&#039;||15.4||13.2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Pinus&#039;&#039;||1.1||1.8&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Quercus&#039;&#039;||0.6||0.9&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Alnus&#039;&#039;||14.3||11.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Corylus&#039;&#039;/&#039;&#039;Myrica&#039;&#039;||12.0||11.0&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Salix&#039;&#039;||2.3||1.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Gramineae||26.3||30.4&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Cyperacea||15.6||26.0&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Ericales||9.4||6.4&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Caryophyllaceae||0.6||1.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Epilobium&#039;&#039;||1.1||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Umbelliferae||0.6||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Polypodium&#039;&#039;||0.6||0.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Sphagnum&#039;&#039;||5.2||0.8&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Filicales&#039;&#039;||3.1||3.4&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although only bulk samples of the organic remains were obtained, pollen analysis, and &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C dating of the organic unit was undertaken. Its pollen content was similar in both pits (see table right) and indicated sparse vegetation. Non-arboreal pollen is dominant, particularly Gramineae and Cyperaceae, and to a lesser extent Ericales. However, &#039;&#039;Betula, Alnus &#039;&#039;and &#039;&#039;Corylus/Myrica &#039;&#039;were present in significant proportions. The environment was, therefore, dominated by grass with some heathland, perhaps on the valley sides. Cyperaceae, and possibly &#039;&#039;Myrica&#039;&#039;, probably grew in the silted, abandoned channel, while some stands of birch, alder and possibly hazel woodland were present locally (Aitken, 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A single sample from Pit 2 was separated into plant macrofossil and organic fractions for radiocarbon dating. The respective fractions yielded dates of 3855 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP (SRR–3718 i) and 4120 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP (SRR–3718 ii) (table below). The slight discrepancy between the two ages is attributed to the presence of reworked older organic residues in the silt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Radiocarbon dates from Late-glacial sites in the district&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Site||Grid reference||Laboratory number||Age (year BP)||Dated material and setting||Reference&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothes cutting||NJ 277 498||Beta 8653||11 110 ± 70||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-104||10 808 ± 230||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-103||11 098 ± 235||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-102||11 308 ± 245||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-101||11 888 ± 225||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-100||11 358 ± 300||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Woodhead, Fyvie||NJ 788 384||SRR-1723||10 780 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Connell and Hall (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Howe of Byth||NJ 822 571||SRR-4830||11320||peat beneath gravel||Hall et al. (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Moss-side, Tarves||NJ 833 318||I-6969||12 200 ± 170||peat under remobilised till||Clapperton and Sugden (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||NO 772 988||HEL-416||10 280 ± 220||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||||HEL-417||11 900 ± 260||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-762||11 550 ± 80||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-763||11 640 ± 70||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||GX-14723||12 460 ± 130||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-3687a. (humic)||12 305 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-368Th (humin)||12 340 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Brinzieshill Farm||NO 7936 7918||SRR-387||12 390 ± 100||peat under remobilised till||Auton et al. (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3803||10 680 ± 100||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3804||11 640 ± 160||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3805||11 760 ± 140||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palaeoentomology was carried out on a single 3.5 kg sample from Pit 2. The full list of Coleoptera is given in the table below. The limited beetle fauna describes a landscape consistent with that suggested by the pollen evidence. Both suggest that the organic unit developed in an abandoned former channel of the river. The plant debris created a wet, boggy surface with open pools of stagnant or only slowly moving water bordered by reed swamp and a ground layer of hygrophilous herbs and scrubby brush or woodland. There is some indication that this was located within a moorland landscape (Dinnin in Aitken, 1991). Some of the beetle species shed light on the interpretation of the channel fill and subsequent floodplain sedimentation. The leaf beetle &#039;&#039;Chrysolina fastuosa &#039;&#039;feeds on hemp and deadnettle, which are arable and cultivated land species. Furthermore, &#039;&#039;Selatosomus incanus &#039;&#039;(click beetle) and &#039;&#039;Trechus quadristriatus &#039;&#039;(ground beetle) are species of open ground, and are commonly found on arable land (Harde, 1981; Lindroth, 1985). These three species indicate the possibility of arable agriculture (Dinnin in Aitken, 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Coleoptera from Nether Daugh (Pit 2)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Species||Head||Thorax||Left elytron||Right elytron||No.&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| CARABIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Trethus quadristriatus (Sch.)||||1||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Bernbidion Maris (Pz.)||1||||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Pterostithus strenuus (Pz.)||||1||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Agonum fuliginosum (Pz.)||11||15||9||10||15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Dromius sp.||||||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| DYTISCIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Hygrotus sp.||1||||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Hydroporus palustris (L.)||4||3||3||3||4&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Hydroporus sp.||||1||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Agabus&#039;&#039;/&#039;&#039;Ilybius&#039;&#039; sp.||F||F||F||F||F&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Rhantus/Acilius sp.||||||F||F||F&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Colymbetes fustus (L.)||||||1||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| HYDROPHILIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Helophorus sp.||1||2||1||1||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Cercyon sp.||1||1||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Hydrobius fustipes (L.)||||||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Laccobius minutus (L.)||1||1||4||3||4&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| HYDRAENIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Octhebius sp.||||||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Hydraena riparia&#039;&#039; (Kug.)||1||1||1||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Limnebius&#039;&#039; sp.||||1||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| STAPHYLINIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Lesteva&#039;&#039; sp.||1||||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Stems comma (LeC.)||||||1||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Sterzus&#039;&#039; sp.||10||8||12||10||12&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Lathrobium ?brunnipes&#039;&#039; (Fab.)||1||2||2||2||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Lathrobium&#039;&#039; sp.||1||||1||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Gabrius&#039;&#039; sp.||1||||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Quedius&#039;&#039; spp.||||2||||1||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Taehyporus ?solutus&#039;&#039; (Erich.)||||||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Taehinus corticinus&#039;&#039; (Gray.)||1||2||1||4||4&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;T latitollis&#039;&#039; (Gray.)||3||3||4||7||7&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aleocharinae gen. et sp. indet.||49||70||59||52||70&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| SCARABAEIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aphodius sphacelatus (Pz.)||1||||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| SCIRTIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Cyphon spp.||12||12||24||20||24&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| ELMIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Esolus parallelepipedus (Muller)||1||2||2||2||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| ELATERIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Selatosomus intanus&#039;&#039; (Gyn.)||||1||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| CANTHARIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Cantharis&#039;&#039; sp.||2||||||1||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| NITIDULIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Meligethes&#039;&#039; sp.||||||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| CRYPTOPHAGIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Atomaria Nesomela&#039;&#039; (Herbst.)||||||1||2||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| LATHRIDIIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Enicmus ?transversus&#039;&#039; (Oliv.)||||1||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| CHRYSOMELIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Donacia&#039;&#039; sp.||||||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Plateumaris sericea&#039;&#039; (L.)||4||1||2||2||4&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Chrysolina&#039;&#039; ?&#039;&#039;fastuosa&#039;&#039; (Scop.)||1||1||1||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Phyllotreta&#039;&#039; sp.||||||1||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| APIONIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Apion&#039;&#039; sp.||1||2||1||||2&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| CURCULIONIDAE||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Phyllobius ?roboretanus&#039;&#039; (Gredler)||||1||1||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Barypeithes ?pyrenaeus&#039;&#039; (Seidlitz)||7||4||2||1||7&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Notaris ?acridulus&#039;&#039; (L.)||1||||||||1&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;Limnobaris pilistriatus&#039;&#039; (Stephens)||1||2||2||1||2&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of only a single Elmidae, &#039;&#039;Esolus parallelopipedus&#039;&#039;, one of the commonest of British Elmids, is also significant. Analysis of sub-fossil assemblages from Warwickshire (Osborne, 1988) demonstrates that the distribution of even the rarest species of this genus are relicts of once widespread ranges. These beetles live on clasts in well-oxygenated water with stony or gravel beds. Osborne (1988) suggested that the local extinction of such species was caused by the influx of particulate sediment burying the coarse-grained river bed. He proposed that such valley fill was the result of soil erosion initiated by either deforestation or changes in land use management. The absence of Elmidae from the Nether Daugh site may have resulted from similar processes within the Don catchment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel abandonment and aggradation of the floodplain probably represents the only significant geomorphological change of the River Don and its valley since early Holocene valley floor stabilisation. This alluvial aggradation probably occurred during the mid- to late Holocene, in a largely cleared landscape. There is limited evidence of arable activity, mainly indicated by the occurrence of certain Coleoptera.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The age of the organic sediments, at about 4000 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP, corresponds with that of the earliest cereal grain found in north-east Scotland, from Balbridie, near Banchory (information from Aberdeen Art Gallery and Museums Environmental Archaeology Unit, 1989). Furthermore, Edwards (1978) and Edwards and Rowntree (1980) have shown that the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age was a period of human impact on vegetation in north-east Scotland, with large-scale forest clearance resulting in increased sedimentation into lochs on Deeside. There is no evidence for significant climatic changes that may have initiated alluviation (Lamb, 1977). Indeed it appears that Holocene climatic changes were subtle and may have had little effect on erosion except where vegetation cover was removed (Brown, 1987). Hence, the infilling of the channel at Nether Daugh, and the subsequent floodplain aggradation, may be partially a consequence of anthropogenic activity in the Don catchment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Crossbrae_Farm,_Turriff_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21753</id>
		<title>Crossbrae Farm, Turriff - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Crossbrae_Farm,_Turriff_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21753"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T09:22:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Crossbrae Farm, Turriff =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915375.png|left|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Late Pleistocene sequence uncovered in a drainage ditch at Crossbrae Farm (NJ 753 512), 3 km north-east of Turriff ([[Media:P915308.png|P915308]] a; [[Media:P915375.png|P915375]]), in 1980 is important for three main reasons. Firstly, the interstadial organic deposits found there predate the last major cold stage and such sediments are rare in Scotland (Lowe, 1984). Secondly, the organic sediments yielded radiocarbon ages of 26 400 ± 170 and 22 380 ± 250 yr BP (SRR–2041) (Hall, 1984), which apparently indicate that they formed during an interstadial episode immediately before the build up of the last ice sheet in Buchan, thus constraining the timing of its expansion. Thirdly, the organic deposits were thought to be overlain only by solifluction deposits (Hall, 1984). The site was therefore cited as part of a body of evidence that this part of Buchan had escaped glaciation during the Late Devensian (Sutherland, 1984a). The results of further excavations at Crossbrae in 1992 ([[Media:P915308.png|P915308]] b) and a multidisciplinary investigation of the sediments have been reported by Whittington et al. (1998).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915308.png|thumbnail|Crossbrae Farm site (after Whittington et al., 1998). P915308.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed &#039;&#039;&#039;locally rests on weathered Devonian pebbly sandstone ([[Media:P915308.png|P915308]] c). The peat may also rest on till, as the drainage contractor for the 1980 excavation reported a ‘hard, reddish-coloured boulder clay’ (Crossbrae Till Formation of [[Media:P915347.png|P915347]], at least 20 cm thick, beneath the peat, but only weathered bedrock was encountered in the 1992 excavations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed reaches a maximum known thickness of 55 cm and comprises sandy peat with interbedded silty sands and sand laminae. Pollen analysis has revealed a former dwarf shrub tundra vegetation, with &#039;&#039;Betula nana &#039;&#039;and &#039;&#039;Salix herbacea&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Bruckenthalia spiculifolia &#039;&#039;was also present in the flora. Supporting evidence of an interstadial environment is provided by a range of plant macrofossil remains and by a total of 40 coleoptera taxa, including &#039;&#039;Olophnum boreale &#039;&#039;(Payk.), &#039;&#039;Acidota quadrata &#039;&#039;(Zett.) and &#039;&#039;Boreaphilus henningianus &#039;&#039;(Sahlb.). None of these beetles live today in the British Isles, but each is found in the present-day fauna of northern Fennoscandia. Based on the overlap of the climatic envelopes of 23 coleoptera species, the average temperature at the time of the formation of the Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed is estimated as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mean temperature of the warmest month 10°C ± 1°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Mean temperature of the coldest month -9°C ± -3°C&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further radiocarbon age determinations for the Peat are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:left; margin-right: 10px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| | SRR–5706 ‘Humic carbon’&lt;br /&gt;
| | 44 030 + 910/-820 yr BP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| | ‘Humin carbon’&lt;br /&gt;
| | &amp;gt;53 630 yr BP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| | SRR–5707 ‘Humic carbon’&lt;br /&gt;
| | 47 180 + 1390/-1190 yr BP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| | ‘Humin carbon’&lt;br /&gt;
| | &amp;gt;61 900 yr BP&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These dates must be seen as minima for the Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed. The dates obtained earlier therefore appear to be anomolously young, probably owing to contamination by younger carbon in groundwater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915290.png|thumbnail|Devensian–Weichselian events in Britain and south-west Fennoscandia. P915290.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed clearly predates the Late-glacial and the Sourlie Interstadial around 30 ka (possibly equivalent to the Ålesund Interstadial of western Norway, [[Media:P915290.png|(P915290)]]. Crossbrae is one of only five sites in Scotland from which pollen of the Balkan heath &#039;&#039;Bruckenthalia &#039;&#039;has been recovered, the others being Camp Fauld (Whittington et al., 1993) and Burn of Benholm (Auton et al., 2000) in north-east Scotland (see below), and Sel Ayre (Birks and Peglar, 1979) and Fugla Ness (Birks and Ransom, 1969) on Shetland (Whittington, 1994). The organic deposits at Allt Odhar (Walker et al., 1992), Sel Ayre and Camp Fauld (Hall, 1993c) all appear to relate to an Early Devensian interstadial in which an early warm phase is succeeded by significantly colder conditions. Available dating evidence suggests correlation of organic sediments at Allt Odhar, Sel Ayre and Burn of Benholm with the Brørup Interstadial, equivalent to OIS 5c [[Media:P915347.png|(P915347)]]. The flora and coleoptera at Crossbrae preclude correlation with the warm stages of OIS 5a or 5c, but may represent the later colder phases. The remarkable similarity between the coleopteran assemblages at Crossbrae and Allt Odhar provides support for a common age. The Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed is tentatively regarded as being of OIS 5c age (Whittington et al., 1998).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915347.png|left|thumbnail|Correlation of lithostratigraphical units in north-east Scotland. P915347.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Excavations in 1992 showed that the Crossbrae Farm Peat Bed is directly overlain by coarse gravel up to 1.2 m in thickness. This clast-supported pebble and cobble gravel unit has a strongly erosive base and is dominated by quartzite and quartzose psammite clasts. It is succeeded by crudely stratified, clast-rich diamictons up to 2.5 m thick. The diamictons contain striated pelite clasts and show a strong down-slope clast fabric. They are interpreted as soliflucted tills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The significance of the Crossbrae Farm site is the presence of a peat deposit that apparently represents an Early Devensian interstadial. The most recently obtained radiocarbon dates indicate that the peat is older than the Middle Devensian and therefore cannot constrain significantly the age of the last glaciation of this part of Buchan. The presence of coarse gravel of possible glaciofluvial origin is important. This gravel unit is most likely to be of Late Devensian age and as such provides no support for the view that part of Buchan escaped glaciation in the Late Devensian. However, it is possible that the gravel is older, as glacial deposits at the Howe of Byth site in Buchan (Hall et al., 1995b) and in the vicinity of Teindland in lower Strathspey (Hall et al., 1995a) have been ascribed to cold stages in Oxygen Isotope Stages 4 and 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Knockhill_Wood,_Glenbervie_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21752</id>
		<title>Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Knockhill_Wood,_Glenbervie_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21752"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T09:19:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915380.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial peat, intercalated between red-brown diamictons at Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie [[Media:P915380.png|(P915380)]], provides important evidence of the age of slope modification in Strathmore by landslipping. The &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C age, pollen spectra and plant macrofossils obtained from the peat, and its stratigraphical contacts suggest that the last movement occurred either during the Loch Lomond Stadial or when the climate ameliorated, during the earliest Holocene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915329.png|left|thumbnail|Location of Knockhill Wood site. P915329.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A composite organic deposit was discovered beneath reddish brown diamicton of the Mearns Drift Group during the resurvey of Sheet 66E Banchory in 1989. The deposits were located in a drainage ditch (NO 7667 8012) on the north-eastern side of a forestry track through Knockhill Wood, on the southern side of the valley of the Bervie Water, upstream of Glenbervie [[Media:P915329.png|(P915329)]]. The organic sediments consisted largely of peat, with subordinate layers of fine peaty sand and laminated clayey silt (see table below). They rested upon an unstratified bouldery till, also reddish brown in colour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Stratigraphy of the Knockhill Wood site&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Unit||Lithology||Description||Thickness (m)||Depth (m)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| A||Landslipped till||&#039;&#039;&#039;Diamicton&#039;&#039;&#039;, stiff, clayey, slightly sandy; moderate reddish brown, &#039;flecked&#039; with red. Clasts angular to subangular, gravel including decomposed andesite. Slightly irregular gradational base||0.25||0.25&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| B||Clayey silt||&#039;&#039;&#039;Clayey silt&#039;&#039;&#039;, with sand laminae and thin wisps of peat. Light olive-grey to pale reddish brown. Sharp planar base||0.05||0.30&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| C||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, compact, with pronounced colour banding on freshly exposed face. Colour ranges from moderate yellowish brown, through dusky yellowish brown to black. Slightly irregular base||0.51||0.81&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| D||Clayey silt||&#039;&#039;&#039;Clayey silt&#039;&#039;&#039;, micaceous, with fine sand and some peat fragments. Dark yellowish brown to moderate greyish red. Uneven base||0.07||0.88&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| E||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, dark yellowish brown to dusky yellowish brown||0.10||0.98&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| F||Silty peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty, laminated, moderate grey||0.06||1.04&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| G||Sand||&#039;&#039;&#039;Sand&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty and clayey, medium- to coarse- grained, greyish red. Some small peat lenses incorporated towards the base||0.16||1.20&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| H||Silty peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty and clayey, moderate olive-grey||0.05||1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| I||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, dark yellowish brown to dusky yellowish brown||0.02||1.27&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| J||Till||&#039;&#039;&#039;Diamicton&#039;&#039;&#039;, firm, sandy and silty, moderate reddish brown. Clasts rounded to well rounded, large cobbles and boulders derived from Old Red sandstone conglomerates||0.15+||1.42&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915330.png|left|thumbnail|Knockhill Wood exposure showing the relationship between the organic and glacigenic sediments. P915330.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The organic deposits are exposed along about 7 m of the ditch, and appear to form a wedge in the side of Knock Hill [[Media:P915330.png|(P915330)]]. They overlie bouldery till (unit J of table above) and are interstratified with clayey silts and sands. At the north-eastern end of the section, the upper part of the organic sequence (units B–F) is truncated by the overlying clayey diamicton of unit A. This diamicton is hard, but plastic, and apart from flecks of more vivid red clay, it shows little sign of internal stratification. Its base is slightly uneven and gradational over about 1 cm. Other sections lower down the hillside show that the basal till (unit J) reaches up to 8 m in thickness and varies laterally from being stiff and clayey, to friable and sandy. It rests on decomposed feldspathic andesite of the Montrose Volcanic Formation in a river cliff of the Bervie Water (NO 7642 8024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915331.png|thumbnail|Graphic log of the organic sequence at Knockhill Wood. P915331.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The base of unit A incorporates wisps and fragments of peat where it overlies the truncated stretch of the organic sequence. The organic sequence itself is penetrated to a depth of about 0.8 m by a vertical, downward-tapering crack filled with red-brown clayey diamicton [[Media:P915330.png|(P915330)]]. The crack is either an ice-wedge pseudomorph, or a vertical fracture that has opened up owing to down-slope gravitational movement. The latter explanation is perhaps more likely as there is no evidence of any reorientation of clasts within the fissure infill, as would be expected if it were of periglacial origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Six samples taken from a monolith [[Media:P915331.png|(P915331)]] for pollen analysis by M J C Walker (University of Wales, Lampeter, 1989), yielded relatively sparse assemblages. Only one hundred pollen grains were counted from each sample (see table below). The pollen assemblages suggest an open, essentially treeless landscape, dominated by grass and sedge, with a number of herbaceous taxa present (e.g. &#039;&#039;Compositae, Cruciferae, Rumex &#039;&#039;and &#039;&#039;Caryophyllaceae&#039;&#039;). Tree pollen was sparse, although willow pollen was notable towards the bottom of the profile. The treeless nature of the landscape suggested by these assemblages is clearly indicative of interstadial or tundra climate, rather than warmer interglacial conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Outline pollen count from Knockhill Wood&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Sample||6||5||4||3||2||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Depth (cm)&lt;br /&gt;
|25-30||45-50||57-67||81-84||97-104||104-107&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Trees&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Betula&#039;&#039; (birch)||1||1||1||1||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot;rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Pinus&#039;&#039; (pine)||1||||||1||2||2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; |Shrubs/ dwarf shrubs&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Corylus&#039;&#039; (hazel)||||||||||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Salix&#039;&#039; (willow)||1||1||||4||4||7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ericaceae (heather)||2||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Empetrum&#039;&#039; (crowberry)||||1||3||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Grass&lt;br /&gt;
|Gramineae||28||14||14||26||32||28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Sedges&lt;br /&gt;
|Cyperaceae||54||75||65||34||34||34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; |Herbaceous taxa&lt;br /&gt;
|Compositae: Liguilflorae (daisy)||||1||1||4||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Compositae: Tubliflorae (daisy)||||||1||19||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Caryophyllaceae (pinks)||||1||3||1||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cruciferae (brassica)||||1||4||2||11||12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Epilobium&#039;&#039; (willowherb)||||||||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Ranunculus&#039;&#039; (buttercup)||||||||2||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Rumex&#039;&#039; (docks)||10||||3||2||3||8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Thalictrum&#039;&#039; (meadow-rues)||||1||1||||4||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Artemesia&#039;&#039; (mugworts)||1||||||||2||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Aquatics&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Myriophyllum&#039;&#039; (water-milfoils)||||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Potamogeton&#039;&#039; (pondweeds)||||||||3||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; |Spores&lt;br /&gt;
|Filicales||||||5||10||11||7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Lycopodium&#039;&#039;||||4||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Lycopodium selago&#039;&#039;||||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Sphagnum&#039;&#039;||165||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Indeterminate&lt;br /&gt;
|2||2||3||4||3||6&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The climatic inferences from the pollen analyses were supported by the results of plant macrofossil analysis by M Field (Keele University, 1991) (see [[Media:P915331.png|P915331]] for sampling intervals). Sample B9 yielded 34 compressed &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;(sedge) fruits. Sample B10 yielded a well-preserved assemblage of macrofossils, but revealed the presence of only three taxa. A single seed of &#039;&#039;Viola &#039;&#039;sp. (violet), 81 compressed &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;fruits and hundreds of seeds of &#039;&#039;Monitia fontana &#039;&#039;subspecies &#039;&#039;fontana&#039;&#039;, a herbaceous annual to perennial of the ‘Blinks’ family (Stace, 1991) were recorded. The latter form is widely distributed at present in northern Britain and reaches north-westwards into northern Scandinavia. It occurs in damp habitats and its occurrence with &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;suggests a damp open landscape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An initial radiocarbon age (GX–14723) of 12 460 ± 130 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP was obtained for an acid-washed bulk sample of the silty peat. A sample taken subsequently was pre-treated to separate the alkali soluble (humic) and alkali insoluble (humin) components for independent age measurement. This was undertaken in order to identify any younger contaminants not completely removed by the pre-treatment. An age of 12 305 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP was obtained for the humic component (SRR–3687a) and 12 340 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP for the humin component (SRR–3687b) (see table below). All of the radiocarbon dates indicate a Late-glacial Interstadial age for the lower part of the sequence. It is possible that the upper parts of the organic sequence may extend into the succeeding Loch Lomond Stadial, but at present, the evidence from the flora is inconclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Radiocarbon dates from Late-glacial sites in the district&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Site||Grid reference||Laboratory number||Age (year BP)||Dated material and setting||Reference&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothes cutting||NJ 277 498||Beta 8653||11 110 ± 70||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-104||10 808 ± 230||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-103||11 098 ± 235||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-102||11 308 ± 245||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-101||11 888 ± 225||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-100||11 358 ± 300||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Woodhead, Fyvie||NJ 788 384||SRR-1723||10 780 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Connell and Hall (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Howe of Byth||NJ 822 571||SRR-4830||11320||peat beneath gravel||Hall et al. (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Moss-side, Tarves||NJ 833 318||I-6969||12 200 ± 170||peat under remobilised till||Clapperton and Sugden (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||NO 772 988||HEL-416||10 280 ± 220||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||||HEL-417||11 900 ± 260||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-762||11 550 ± 80||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-763||11 640 ± 70||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||GX-14723||12 460 ± 130||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-3687a. (humic)||12 305 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-368Th (humin)||12 340 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Brinzieshill Farm||NO 7936 7918||SRR-387||12 390 ± 100||peat under remobilised till||Auton et al. (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3803||10 680 ± 100||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3804||11 640 ± 160||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3805||11 760 ± 140||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeontological studies of the sequence at Knockhill Wood and the radiocarbon dates suggest that the organic sediments were laid down in a cool damp environment, during the Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial. The organic sequence overlies a basal bouldery lodgement till of probable main Late Devensian age, laid down on top of weathered andesite bedrock. The basal till is assigned to the Mill of Forest Till Formation. The origin of the overlying matrix-supported clayey diamicton is more problematic. Its compact structure and absence of well-developed internal stratification are typical attributes of lodgement or deforming-bed tills, rather than flow tills. No tills of Loch Lomond Stadial age are known from the district. Indeed, dating and palynological evidence from sites such as the Loch of Park indicate that the low ground was deglaciated throughout the Loch Lomond Stadial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915332.png|thumbnail|Postulated form of the landslip Knockhill Wood. P915332.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The upper diamicton has a gradational, but apparently conformable contact with the underlying organic sediments in the south-western part of the Knockhill Wood section, but it sharply truncates the upper part of the same sequence at the north-eastern (downslope) end of the exposure. This cross-cutting relationship, together with incorporation of fragments of peat in the till near the truncation surface, suggest that the diamicton has been emplaced as part of a landslip. The slip occurred by downslope movement along a gently curved, low-angle plane at the top of the laminated clayey silts [[Media:P915332.png|(P915332)]]. It is likely that slipping also occurred at the till/bedrock contact. If the tapering feature cutting the organic sequence is an ice-wedge cast, its presence would suggest that the movement probably occurred immediately following the Loch Lomond Stadial when rapid climatic amelioration took place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Knockhill_Wood,_Glenbervie_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21750</id>
		<title>Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Knockhill_Wood,_Glenbervie_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21750"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T08:58:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915380.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial peat, intercalated between red-brown diamictons at Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie [[Media:P915380.png|(P915380)]], provides important evidence of the age of slope modification in Strathmore by landslipping. The &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C age, pollen spectra and plant macrofossils obtained from the peat, and its stratigraphical contacts suggest that the last movement occurred either during the Loch Lomond Stadial or when the climate ameliorated, during the earliest Holocene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915329.png|left|thumbnail|Location of Knockhill Wood site. P915329.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A composite organic deposit was discovered beneath reddish brown diamicton of the Mearns Drift Group during the resurvey of Sheet 66E Banchory in 1989. The deposits were located in a drainage ditch (NO 7667 8012) on the north-eastern side of a forestry track through Knockhill Wood, on the southern side of the valley of the Bervie Water, upstream of Glenbervie [[Media:P915329.png|(P915329)]]. The organic sediments consisted largely of peat, with subordinate layers of fine peaty sand and laminated clayey silt (see table below). They rested upon an unstratified bouldery till, also reddish brown in colour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Stratigraphy of the Knockhill Wood site&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Unit||Lithology||Description||Thickness (m)||Depth (m)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| A||Landslipped till||&#039;&#039;&#039;Diamicton&#039;&#039;&#039;, stiff, clayey, slightly sandy; moderate reddish brown, &#039;flecked&#039; with red. Clasts angular to subangular, gravel including decomposed andesite. Slightly irregular gradational base||0.25||0.25&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| B||Clayey silt||&#039;&#039;&#039;Clayey silt&#039;&#039;&#039;, with sand laminae and thin wisps of peat. Light olive-grey to pale reddish brown. Sharp planar base||0.05||0.30&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| C||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, compact, with pronounced colour banding on freshly exposed face. Colour ranges from moderate yellowish brown, through dusky yellowish brown to black. Slightly irregular base||0.51||0.81&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| D||Clayey silt||&#039;&#039;&#039;Clayey silt&#039;&#039;&#039;, micaceous, with fine sand and some peat fragments. Dark yellowish brown to moderate greyish red. Uneven base||0.07||0.88&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| E||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, dark yellowish brown to dusky yellowish brown||0.10||0.98&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| F||Silty peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty, laminated, moderate grey||0.06||1.04&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| G||Sand||&#039;&#039;&#039;Sand&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty and clayey, medium- to coarse- grained, greyish red. Some small peat lenses incorporated towards the base||0.16||1.20&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| H||Silty peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty and clayey, moderate olive-grey||0.05||1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| I||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, dark yellowish brown to dusky yellowish brown||0.02||1.27&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| J||Till||&#039;&#039;&#039;Diamicton&#039;&#039;&#039;, firm, sandy and silty, moderate reddish brown. Clasts rounded to well rounded, large cobbles and boulders derived from Old Red sandstone conglomerates||0.15+||1.42&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915330.png|left|thumbnail|Knockhill Wood exposure showing the relationship between the organic and glacigenic sediments. P915330.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The organic deposits are exposed along about 7 m of the ditch, and appear to form a wedge in the side of Knock Hill [[Media:P915330.png|(P915330)]]. They overlie bouldery till (unit J of table above) and are interstratified with clayey silts and sands. At the north-eastern end of the section, the upper part of the organic sequence (units B–F) is truncated by the overlying clayey diamicton of unit A. This diamicton is hard, but plastic, and apart from flecks of more vivid red clay, it shows little sign of internal stratification. Its base is slightly uneven and gradational over about 1 cm. Other sections lower down the hillside show that the basal till (unit J) reaches up to 8 m in thickness and varies laterally from being stiff and clayey, to friable and sandy. It rests on decomposed feldspathic andesite of the Montrose Volcanic Formation in a river cliff of the Bervie Water (NO 7642 8024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915331.png|thumbnail|Graphic log of the organic sequence at Knockhill Wood. P915331.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The base of unit A incorporates wisps and fragments of peat where it overlies the truncated stretch of the organic sequence. The organic sequence itself is penetrated to a depth of about 0.8 m by a vertical, downward-tapering crack filled with red-brown clayey diamicton [[Media:P915330.png|(P915330)]]. The crack is either an ice-wedge pseudomorph, or a vertical fracture that has opened up owing to down-slope gravitational movement. The latter explanation is perhaps more likely as there is no evidence of any reorientation of clasts within the fissure infill, as would be expected if it were of periglacial origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Six samples taken from a monolith [[Media:P915331.png|(P915331)]] for pollen analysis by M J C Walker (University of Wales, Lampeter, 1989), yielded relatively sparse assemblages. Only one hundred pollen grains were counted from each sample (see table below). The pollen assemblages suggest an open, essentially treeless landscape, dominated by grass and sedge, with a number of herbaceous taxa present (e.g. &#039;&#039;Compositae, Cruciferae, Rumex &#039;&#039;and &#039;&#039;Caryophyllaceae&#039;&#039;). Tree pollen was sparse, although willow pollen was notable towards the bottom of the profile. The treeless nature of the landscape suggested by these assemblages is clearly indicative of interstadial or tundra climate, rather than warmer interglacial conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Outline pollen count from Knockhill Wood&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Sample||6||5||4||3||2||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Depth (cm)&lt;br /&gt;
|25-30||45-50||57-67||81-84||97-104||104-107&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Trees&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Betula&#039;&#039; (birch)||1||1||1||1||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot;rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Pinus&#039;&#039; (pine)||1||||||1||2||2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; |Shrubs/ dwarf shrubs&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Corylus&#039;&#039; (hazel)||||||||||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Salix&#039;&#039; (willow)||1||1||||4||4||7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ericaceae (heather)||2||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Empetrum&#039;&#039; (crowberry)||||1||3||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Grass&lt;br /&gt;
|Gramineae||28||14||14||26||32||28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Sedges&lt;br /&gt;
|Cyperaceae||54||75||65||34||34||34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot; |Herbaceous taxa&lt;br /&gt;
|Compositae: Liguilflorae (daisy)||||1||1||4||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Compositae: Tubliflorae (daisy)||||||1||19||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Caryophyllaceae (pinks)||||1||3||1||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cruciferae (brassica)||||1||4||2||11||12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Epilobium&#039;&#039; (willowherb)||||||||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Ranunculus&#039;&#039; (buttercup)||||||||2||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Rumex&#039;&#039; (docks)||10||||3||2||3||8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Thalictrum&#039;&#039; (meadow-rues)||||1||1||||4||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Artemesia&#039;&#039; (mugworts)||1||||||||2||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Aquatics&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Myriophyllum&#039;&#039; (water-milfoils)||||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Potamogeton&#039;&#039; (pondweeds)||||||||3||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; |Spores&lt;br /&gt;
|Filicales||||||5||10||11||7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Lycopodium&#039;&#039;||||4||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Lycopodium selago&#039;&#039;||||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;Sphagnum&#039;&#039;||165||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;row&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Indeterminate&lt;br /&gt;
|2||2||3||4||3||6&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The climatic inferences from the pollen analyses were supported by the results of plant macrofossil analysis by M Field (Keele University, 1991) (see [[Media:P915331.png|P915331]] for sampling intervals). Sample B9 yielded 34 compressed &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;(sedge) fruits. Sample B10 yielded a well-preserved assemblage of macrofossils, but revealed the presence of only three taxa. A single seed of &#039;&#039;Viola &#039;&#039;sp. (violet), 81 compressed &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;fruits and hundreds of seeds of &#039;&#039;Monitia fontana &#039;&#039;subspecies &#039;&#039;fontana&#039;&#039;, a herbaceous annual to perennial of the ‘Blinks’ family (Stace, 1991) were recorded. The latter form is widely distributed at present in northern Britain and reaches north-westwards into northern Scandinavia. It occurs in damp habitats and its occurrence with &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;suggests a damp open landscape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An initial radiocarbon age (GX–14723) of 12 460 ± 130 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP was obtained for an acid-washed bulk sample of the silty peat. A sample taken subsequently was pre-treated to separate the alkali soluble (humic) and alkali insoluble (humin) components for independent age measurement. This was undertaken in order to identify any younger contaminants not completely removed by the pre-treatment. An age of 12 305 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP was obtained for the humic component (SRR–3687a) and 12 340 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP for the humin component (SRR–3687b) (see table below). All of the radiocarbon dates indicate a Late-glacial Interstadial age for the lower part of the sequence. It is possible that the upper parts of the organic sequence may extend into the succeeding Loch Lomond Stadial, but at present, the evidence from the flora is inconclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Radiocarbon dates from Late-glacial sites in the district&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Site||Grid reference||Laboratory number||Age (year BP)||Dated material and setting||Reference&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothes cutting||NJ 277 498||Beta 8653||11 110 ± 70||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-104||10 808 ± 230||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-103||11 098 ± 235||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-102||11 308 ± 245||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-101||11 888 ± 225||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-100||11 358 ± 300||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Woodhead, Fyvie||NJ 788 384||SRR-1723||10 780 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Connell and Hall (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Howe of Byth||NJ 822 571||SRR-4830||11320||peat beneath gravel||Hall et al. (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Moss-side, Tarves||NJ 833 318||I-6969||12 200 ± 170||peat under remobilised till||Clapperton and Sugden (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||NO 772 988||HEL-416||10 280 ± 220||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||||HEL-417||11 900 ± 260||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-762||11 550 ± 80||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-763||11 640 ± 70||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||GX-14723||12 460 ± 130||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-3687a. (humic)||12 305 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-368Th (humin)||12 340 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Brinzieshill Farm||NO 7936 7918||SRR-387||12 390 ± 100||peat under remobilised till||Auton et al. (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3803||10 680 ± 100||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3804||11 640 ± 160||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3805||11 760 ± 140||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeontological studies of the sequence at Knockhill Wood and the radiocarbon dates suggest that the organic sediments were laid down in a cool damp environment, during the Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial. The organic sequence overlies a basal bouldery lodgement till of probable main Late Devensian age, laid down on top of weathered andesite bedrock. The basal till is assigned to the Mill of Forest Till Formation. The origin of the overlying matrix-supported clayey diamicton is more problematic. Its compact structure and absence of well-developed internal stratification are typical attributes of lodgement or deforming-bed tills, rather than flow tills. No tills of Loch Lomond Stadial age are known from the district. Indeed, dating and palynological evidence from sites such as the Loch of Park indicate that the low ground was deglaciated throughout the Loch Lomond Stadial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915332.png|thumbnail|Postulated form of the landslip Knockhill Wood. P915332.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The upper diamicton has a gradational, but apparently conformable contact with the underlying organic sediments in the south-western part of the Knockhill Wood section, but it sharply truncates the upper part of the same sequence at the north-eastern (downslope) end of the exposure. This cross-cutting relationship, together with incorporation of fragments of peat in the till near the truncation surface, suggest that the diamicton has been emplaced as part of a landslip. The slip occurred by downslope movement along a gently curved, low-angle plane at the top of the laminated clayey silts [[Media:P915332.png|(P915332)]]. It is likely that slipping also occurred at the till/bedrock contact. If the tapering feature cutting the organic sequence is an ice-wedge cast, its presence would suggest that the movement probably occurred immediately following the Loch Lomond Stadial when rapid climatic amelioration took place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Knockhill_Wood,_Glenbervie_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21746</id>
		<title>Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Knockhill_Wood,_Glenbervie_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21746"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T08:06:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915380.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial peat, intercalated between red-brown diamictons at Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie [[Media:P915380.png|(P915380)]], provides important evidence of the age of slope modification in Strathmore by landslipping. The &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C age, pollen spectra and plant macrofossils obtained from the peat, and its stratigraphical contacts suggest that the last movement occurred either during the Loch Lomond Stadial or when the climate ameliorated, during the earliest Holocene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915329.png|left|thumbnail|Location of Knockhill Wood site. P915329.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A composite organic deposit was discovered beneath reddish brown diamicton of the Mearns Drift Group during the resurvey of Sheet 66E Banchory in 1989. The deposits were located in a drainage ditch (NO 7667 8012) on the north-eastern side of a forestry track through Knockhill Wood, on the southern side of the valley of the Bervie Water, upstream of Glenbervie [[Media:P915329.png|(P915329)]]. The organic sediments consisted largely of peat, with subordinate layers of fine peaty sand and laminated clayey silt (see table below). They rested upon an unstratified bouldery till, also reddish brown in colour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Stratigraphy of the Knockhill Wood site&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Unit||Lithology||Description||Thickness (m)||Depth (m)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| A||Landslipped till||&#039;&#039;&#039;Diamicton&#039;&#039;&#039;, stiff, clayey, slightly sandy; moderate reddish brown, &#039;flecked&#039; with red. Clasts angular to subangular, gravel including decomposed andesite. Slightly irregular gradational base||0.25||0.25&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| B||Clayey silt||&#039;&#039;&#039;Clayey silt&#039;&#039;&#039;, with sand laminae and thin wisps of peat. Light olive-grey to pale reddish brown. Sharp planar base||0.05||0.30&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| C||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, compact, with pronounced colour banding on freshly exposed face. Colour ranges from moderate yellowish brown, through dusky yellowish brown to black. Slightly irregular base||0.51||0.81&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| D||Clayey silt||&#039;&#039;&#039;Clayey silt&#039;&#039;&#039;, micaceous, with fine sand and some peat fragments. Dark yellowish brown to moderate greyish red. Uneven base||0.07||0.88&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| E||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, dark yellowish brown to dusky yellowish brown||0.10||0.98&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| F||Silty peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty, laminated, moderate grey||0.06||1.04&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| G||Sand||&#039;&#039;&#039;Sand&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty and clayey, medium- to coarse- grained, greyish red. Some small peat lenses incorporated towards the base||0.16||1.20&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| H||Silty peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, silty and clayey, moderate olive-grey||0.05||1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| I||Fibrous peat||&#039;&#039;&#039;Peat&#039;&#039;&#039;, fibrous, dark yellowish brown to dusky yellowish brown||0.02||1.27&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| J||Till||&#039;&#039;&#039;Diamicton&#039;&#039;&#039;, firm, sandy and silty, moderate reddish brown. Clasts rounded to well rounded, large cobbles and boulders derived from Old Red sandstone conglomerates||0.15+||1.42&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915330.png|thumbnail|Knockhill Wood exposure showing the relationship between the organic and glacigenic sediments. P915330.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The organic deposits are exposed along about 7 m of the ditch, and appear to form a wedge in the side of Knock Hill [[Media:P915330.png|(P915330)]]. They overlie bouldery till (unit J of table above) and are interstratified with clayey silts and sands. At the north-eastern end of the section, the upper part of the organic sequence (units B–F) is truncated by the overlying clayey diamicton of unit A. This diamicton is hard, but plastic, and apart from flecks of more vivid red clay, it shows little sign of internal stratification. Its base is slightly uneven and gradational over about 1 cm. Other sections lower down the hillside show that the basal till (unit J) reaches up to 8 m in thickness and varies laterally from being stiff and clayey, to friable and sandy. It rests on decomposed feldspathic andesite of the Montrose Volcanic Formation in a river cliff of the Bervie Water (NO 7642 8024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The base of unit A incorporates wisps and fragments of peat where it overlies the truncated stretch of the organic sequence. The organic sequence itself is penetrated to a depth of about 0.8 m by a vertical, downward-tapering crack filled with red-brown clayey diamicton [[Media:P915330.png|(P915330)]]. The crack is either an ice-wedge pseudomorph, or a vertical fracture that has opened up owing to down-slope gravitational movement. The latter explanation is perhaps more likely as there is no evidence of any reorientation of clasts within the fissure infill, as would be expected if it were of periglacial origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915331.png|left|thumbnail|Graphic log of the organic sequence at Knockhill Wood. P915331.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915315.png|thumbnail|Schematic stratigraphical relationships in the Sandford Bay area. P915315.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Six samples taken from a monolith [[Media:P915331.png|(P915331)]] for pollen analysis by M J C Walker (University of Wales, Lampeter, 1989), yielded relatively sparse assemblages. Only one hundred pollen grains were counted from each sample [[Media:P915315.png|(P915315)]]. The pollen assemblages suggest an open, essentially treeless landscape, dominated by grass and sedge, with a number of herbaceous taxa present (e.g. &#039;&#039;Compositae, Cruciferae, Rumex &#039;&#039;and &#039;&#039;Caryophyllaceae&#039;&#039;). Tree pollen was sparse, although willow pollen was notable towards the bottom of the profile. The treeless nature of the landscape suggested by these assemblages is clearly indicative of interstadial or tundra climate, rather than warmer interglacial conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The climatic inferences from the pollen analyses were supported by the results of plant macrofossil analysis by M Field (Keele University, 1991) (see [[Media:P915331.png|P915331]] for sampling intervals). Sample B9 yielded 34 compressed &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;(sedge) fruits. Sample B10 yielded a well-preserved assemblage of macrofossils, but revealed the presence of only three taxa. A single seed of &#039;&#039;Viola &#039;&#039;sp. (violet), 81 compressed &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;fruits and hundreds of seeds of &#039;&#039;Monitia fontana &#039;&#039;subspecies &#039;&#039;fontana&#039;&#039;, a herbaceous annual to perennial of the ‘Blinks’ family (Stace, 1991) were recorded. The latter form is widely distributed at present in northern Britain and reaches north-westwards into northern Scandinavia. It occurs in damp habitats and its occurrence with &#039;&#039;Carex &#039;&#039;suggests a damp open landscape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An initial radiocarbon age (GX–14723) of 12 460 ± 130 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP was obtained for an acid-washed bulk sample of the silty peat. A sample taken subsequently was pre-treated to separate the alkali soluble (humic) and alkali insoluble (humin) components for independent age measurement. This was undertaken in order to identify any younger contaminants not completely removed by the pre-treatment. An age of 12 305 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP was obtained for the humic component (SRR–3687a) and 12 340 ± 50 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP for the humin component (SRR–3687b) (see table below). All of the radiocarbon dates indicate a Late-glacial Interstadial age for the lower part of the sequence. It is possible that the upper parts of the organic sequence may extend into the succeeding Loch Lomond Stadial, but at present, the evidence from the flora is inconclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Radiocarbon dates from Late-glacial sites in the district&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Site||Grid reference||Laboratory number||Age (year BP)||Dated material and setting||Reference&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothes cutting||NJ 277 498||Beta 8653||11 110 ± 70||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-104||10 808 ± 230||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-103||11 098 ± 235||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-102||11 308 ± 245||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-101||11 888 ± 225||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Garral Hill, Keith||NJ 444 551||Q-100||11 358 ± 300||peat under remobilised till||Godwin and Willis (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Woodhead, Fyvie||NJ 788 384||SRR-1723||10 780 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Connell and Hall (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Howe of Byth||NJ 822 571||SRR-4830||11320||peat beneath gravel||Hall et al. (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Moss-side, Tarves||NJ 833 318||I-6969||12 200 ± 170||peat under remobilised till||Clapperton and Sugden (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||NO 772 988||HEL-416||10 280 ± 220||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Loch of Park||||HEL-417||11 900 ± 260||kettlehole infill||Vasari and Vasari (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-762||11 550 ± 80||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Dyce||NJ 8713 1496||SRR-763||11 640 ± 70||kettlehole infill||Harkness and Wilson (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||GX-14723||12 460 ± 130||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-3687a. (humic)||12 305 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Glenbervie||NO 767 801||SRR-368Th (humin)||12 340 ± 50||peat under remobilised till||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Brinzieshill Farm||NO 7936 7918||SRR-387||12 390 ± 100||peat under remobilised till||Auton et al. (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3803||10 680 ± 100||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3804||11 640 ± 160||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rothens||NJ 688 171||SRR-3805||11 760 ± 140||kettlehole infill||Appendix 1&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeontological studies of the sequence at Knockhill Wood and the radiocarbon dates suggest that the organic sediments were laid down in a cool damp environment, during the Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial. The organic sequence overlies a basal bouldery lodgement till of probable main Late Devensian age, laid down on top of weathered andesite bedrock. The basal till is assigned to the Mill of Forest Till Formation. The origin of the overlying matrix-supported clayey diamicton is more problematic. Its compact structure and absence of well-developed internal stratification are typical attributes of lodgement or deforming-bed tills, rather than flow tills. No tills of Loch Lomond Stadial age are known from the district. Indeed, dating and palynological evidence from sites such as the Loch of Park indicate that the low ground was deglaciated throughout the Loch Lomond Stadial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915332.png|thumbnail|Postulated form of the landslip Knockhill Wood. P915332.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The upper diamicton has a gradational, but apparently conformable contact with the underlying organic sediments in the south-western part of the Knockhill Wood section, but it sharply truncates the upper part of the same sequence at the north-eastern (downslope) end of the exposure. This cross-cutting relationship, together with incorporation of fragments of peat in the till near the truncation surface, suggest that the diamicton has been emplaced as part of a landslip. The slip occurred by downslope movement along a gently curved, low-angle plane at the top of the laminated clayey silts [[Media:P915332.png|(P915332)]]. It is likely that slipping also occurred at the till/bedrock contact. If the tapering feature cutting the organic sequence is an ice-wedge cast, its presence would suggest that the movement probably occurred immediately following the Loch Lomond Stadial when rapid climatic amelioration took place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Outline pollen count from Knockhill Wood&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Sample||||6||5||4||3||2||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Depth (cm)&#039;&#039;&#039;||||25-30||45-50||57-67||81-84||97-104||104-107&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Trees&#039;&#039;&#039;||&#039;&#039;Betula&#039;&#039; (birch)||1||1||1||1||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Pinus&#039;&#039; (pine)||1||||||1||2||2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubs/ dwarf shrubs&#039;&#039;&#039;||&#039;&#039;Corylus&#039;&#039; (hazel)||||||||||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Salix&#039;&#039; (willow)||1||1||||4||4||7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||Ericaceae (heather)||2||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Empetrum&#039;&#039; (crowberry)||||1||3||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Grass&#039;&#039;&#039;||Gramineae||28||14||14||26||32||28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Sedges&#039;&#039;&#039;||Cyperaceae||54||75||65||34||34||34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Herbaceous taxa&#039;&#039;&#039;||Compositae: Liguilflorae (daisy)||||1||1||4||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||Compositae: Tubliflorae (daisy)||||||1||19||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||Caryophyllaceae (pinks)||||1||3||1||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||Cruciferae (brassica)||||1||4||2||11||12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Epilobium&#039;&#039; (willowherb)||||||||||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Ranunculus&#039;&#039; (buttercup)||||||||2||1||1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Rumex&#039;&#039; (docks)||10||||3||2||3||8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Thalictrum&#039;&#039; (meadow-rues)||||1||1||||4||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Artemesia&#039;&#039; (mugworts)||1||||||||2||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Aquatics&#039;&#039;&#039;||&#039;&#039;Myriophyllum&#039;&#039; (water-milfoils)||||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Potamogeton&#039;&#039; (pondweeds)||||||||3||1||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Spores&#039;&#039;&#039;||Filicales||||||5||10||11||7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Lycopodium&#039;&#039;||||4||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Lycopodium selago&#039;&#039;||||1||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ||&#039;&#039;Sphagnum&#039;&#039;||165||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &#039;&#039;&#039;Indeterminate&#039;&#039;&#039;||||2||2||3||4||3||6&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Category:Grampian_Highlands&amp;diff=21743</id>
		<title>Category:Grampian Highlands</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Category:Grampian_Highlands&amp;diff=21743"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T07:51:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the articles in this category are derived from the following BGS publications: &lt;br /&gt;
::[[British regional geology: Grampian Highlands|Grampian Highlands regional guide]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed heights =&amp;quot;150px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
File:P749349.jpg|[[British regional geology: Grampian Highlands|Link]]&lt;br /&gt;
File:P915245.jpg|[[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Link]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Geological regions of Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geological regions of Scotland]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Category:Grampian_Highlands&amp;diff=21742</id>
		<title>Category:Grampian Highlands</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Category:Grampian_Highlands&amp;diff=21742"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T07:50:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the articles in this category are derived from the following BGS publications: &lt;br /&gt;
::[[British regional geology: Grampian Highlands|Grampian Highlands regional guide]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery left mode=packed heights =&amp;quot;150px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
File:P749349.jpg|[[British regional geology: Grampian Highlands|Link]]&lt;br /&gt;
File:P915245.jpg|[[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Link]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Geological regions of Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geological regions of Scotland]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Category:Grampian_Highlands&amp;diff=21741</id>
		<title>Category:Grampian Highlands</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Category:Grampian_Highlands&amp;diff=21741"/>
		<updated>2015-09-17T07:48:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the articles in this category are derived from the following BGS publications: &lt;br /&gt;
::[[British regional geology: Grampian Highlands|Grampian Highlands regional guide]],&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=packed heights =&amp;quot;150px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
File:P749349.jpg|[[British regional geology: Grampian Highlands|Link]]&lt;br /&gt;
File:P915245.jpg|[[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Link]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Geological regions of Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geological regions of Scotland]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_geology_and_landscape_evolution_of_north-east_Scotland_-_important_localities&amp;diff=21729</id>
		<title>Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland - important localities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_geology_and_landscape_evolution_of_north-east_Scotland_-_important_localities&amp;diff=21729"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T12:22:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Sites of significance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Site number||Site name||Site characteristics and significance&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1||Teindland||Long sequence; 4 tills; Ipswichian palaeosol; luminescence dated sand&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 2||Boyne Limestone Quarry||Mesozoic rafts; glacitectonites; 3 tills one shelly; Whitehills Glacigenic Formation with OIS 2/3 shells&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 3||Castle Hill, Gardenstown||Mesozoic rafts; glacitectonites; 3 tills one shelly; Whitehills Glacigenic Formation with OIS 2/3 shells; capped by glaciolacustrine  Kirkburn Silt Formation&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 4||King Edward||Rafted OIS 3/4 shelly deposits&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 5||Crossbrae Farm, Turriff||Early Devensian peat bed; gelifluctates&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 6||Howe of Byth Quarry||Windermere Interstadial peat; OIS 2 till; OIS 3 gravel (luminescence dated)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 7||Kirkhill and Leys quarries||Longest sequence in region; 2 palaeosols; 5 gelifluctate beds; three 100 ka cycles represented (3 tills)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8||Oldmill pit||Mesozoic rafts; glacitectonites; 2 tills, old gravel&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 9||Philorth valley||Estuarine deposits and peat; Holocene sea level change&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 10||Ugie valley||Glacial Lake Ugie and possible mid OIS 2 readvance; tundra polygons&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11||St Fergus||Raised OIS 2 glaciomarine silts and late readvance; tundra polygons&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12||Sandford Bay||Logie-Buchan Drift Group deformation tills and clays on &#039;local&#039; till with sparse Norwegian erratics&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 13||Windy Hills||Neogene quartzite gravels; tills and gelifluctates; GPR traverse&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14||Moss of Cruden||Devonian Smallburn Sandstone Formation outlier Lower Cretaceous Moreseat Sandstone Formation outlier Neogene Buchan Ridge flint/quartzite gravels Camp Fauld; Early Devensian peat bed, 2 tills&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 15||Ellon (Bellscamphie)||&#039;indigo&#039; shelly till; long sequence with 4 tills&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16||Kippet Hills (Slains)||Esker; Logie-Buchan Drift Group; early Pleistocene shells&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 17||Errollston Clay Pit||Logie-Buchan Drift Group deformation tills and clays&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18||Mill of Dyce pit||Deglaciation of lower Don valley; deltaic sequence&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 19||Strabathie, Bridge of Don||Deltaic sequence formed during parting of ice streams&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 20||Nether Daugh, Kintore||Meander infill; late Holocene environmental change&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 21||Rothens, Monymusk||Kettle hole infill; Late-glacial sequence&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 22||Nigg Bay, Aberdeen||Long sequence including elements of four drift groups&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 23||Loch of Park, Banchory||Late-glacial to Holocene pollen sequence&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 24||Balnakettle, Fettercairn||Tectonised sequence; late readvance of East Grampian ice&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 25||Knockhill, Glenbervie||Windermere Interstadial peat bed under landslipped till&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 26||Burn of Benholm||Red till on Early Devensian peat on shelly diamicton&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Important localities===&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Teindland, near Elgin - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|1 Teindland, near Elgin]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Boyne Limestone Quarry - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|2 Boyne Limestone Quarry]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Castle Hill, Gardenstown - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|3 Castle Hill, Gardenstown]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[King Edward - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|4 King Edward]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Crossbrae Farm, Turriff - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|5 Crossbrae Farm, Turriff]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Howe of Byth Quarry - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|6 Howe of Byth Quarry]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Kirkhill and Leys quarries - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|7 Kirkhill and Leys quarries]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Oldmill Quarry - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|8 Oldmill Quarry]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Philorth valley, Fraserburgh - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|9 Philorth valley, Fraserburgh]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Ugie valley - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|10 Ugie valley]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[St Fergus (Annachie) - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|11 St Fergus (Annachie)]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Sandford Bay - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|12 Sandford Bay]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Windyhills - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|13 Windyhills]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|14 Moss of Cruden]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Ellon (Bellscamphie) - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|15 Ellon (Bellscamphie)]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Kippet Hills, Slains - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|16 Kippet Hills, Slains]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Errollston Clay Pit, Cruden Bay - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|17 Errollston Clay Pit, Cruden Bay]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Mill of Dyce - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|18 Mill of Dyce]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Strabathie - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|19 Strabathie]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Nether Daugh, Kintore - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|20 Nether Daugh, Kintore]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Rothens, Monymusk - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|21 Rothens, Monymusk]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Nigg Bay, Aberdeen - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|22 Nigg Bay, Aberdeen]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Loch of Park - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|23 Loch of Park]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Balnakettle - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|24 Balnakettle]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|25 Knockhill Wood, Glenbervie]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Burn of Benholm - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|26 Burn of Benholm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland,_introduction&amp;diff=21727</id>
		<title>Cainozoic of north-east Scotland, introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland,_introduction&amp;diff=21727"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T11:01:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Introduction  =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915341.png|thumbnail|Summary of events preserved in the marine and onshore records. P915341.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The region described here (and referred henceforth as ‘the district’) spans the coastal hinterland and Buchan Plateau of north-east Scotland stretching from Elgin, on the southern coast of the Moray Firth, to Inverbervie, on the North Sea coast [[Media:P915248.png|(P915248)]]. This account summarises the Quaternary geology [[Media:P915341.png|(P915341)]] presented on the Drift (or Solid-and-Drift) editions of the 1:50 000 Series sheets 66 Banchory, 67 Stonehaven, 76E Inverurie, 86E Turriff, 87W Ellon, 87E Peterhead, 96W Portsoy, 96E Banff and 97 Fraserburgh. It also encompasses sheets 77 Aberdeen and 95 Elgin, for which modern memoirs including full descriptive accounts on the Quaternary are available. Details of the coverage and availability of maps, memoirs, sheet explanations and other publications are given in Information Sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Division of the Cainozoic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Era||Period (System)||Epoch (Series)||Age (of base Ma)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:middle;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; | CAINAZOIC&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | QUATERNARY&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Holocene||0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Pleistocene||2.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Pliocene||5.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |NEOGENE&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Miocene||23.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Oligocene||33.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |PALAEOGENE&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Eocene||54.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Paleocene||65.0&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this memoir is to consider landscape evolution throughout the Cainozoic era (table above), as well providing a description of the Quaternary deposits shown on the maps mentioned below. Many elements of the landscape were created prior to the Quaternary, and furthermore, important deposits of Palaeogene to Neogene age have been shown as drift deposits on some maps. Place names mentioned in the text and a selection of geomorphological features, deposits and other Cainozoic phenomena are shown on the following maps:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915248.png|left|thumbnail|Topography and geological sheet boundaries. P915248.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915371.png|Elgin district. P915371.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915372.png|Sheet 96W Portsoy. P915372.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915373.png|Sheet 96E Banff. P915373.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915374.png|Sheet 97 Fraserburgh. P915374.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915375.png|Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915376.png|Sheet 87W Ellon. P915376.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915377.png|Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915378.png|Sheet 76E Inverurie. P915378.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915379.png|Sheet 77 Aberdeen. P915379.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915380.png|Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915381.png|Sheet 67 Stonehaven. P915381.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915249.png|thumbnail|Solid geology of the district. P915249.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal lowlands of north-east Scotland flank the Grampian Highlands, which rise south-westwards towards the Cairngorm Mountains. Much of the district lies below the 250 m contour and is characterised by a series of ancient plateau surfaces eroded across a wide variety of rock types. The predominant surface is the rolling Buchan Plateau [[Media:P915248.png|(P915248)]] lying between 60 and 150 m OD. Only the most resistant quartzitic rocks form distinct hills, such as the conspicuous Mormond Hill (234 m OD), between Fraserburgh and Peterhead, and the more subdued Hill of Dudwick to the north-east of Ellon. The Buchan Plateau is crossed by a broad, gently undulating ridge that trends south-westwards from the coast at Troup Head (Sheet 96E) and which is developed mainly on relatively flat-lying Old Red Sandstone lithologies and Dalradian slates [[Media:P915249.png|(P915249)]]. Other similar trending ridges, some 220 to 310 m high, are formed mainly of steeply dipping Dalradian quartzite, and reach the high, rugged coastline of the Moray Firth between Banff and Portknockie. These ridges merge westwards, towards the River Spey, into a dissected plateau standing between 180 and 265 m OD. It is developed across Old Red Sandstone lithologies, Dalradian flaggy micaceous psammites and semipelites and more massive quartzites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P220387.jpg|left|thumbnail|View of Bennachie taken from the north-east. P220387.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Buchan Plateau is overlooked on its south-western margin by Bennachie (528 m OD) (Sheet 76E), a local granite landmark that has become part of the folklore of the region [[Media:P220387.jpg|(P220387)]]. Farther south, other large hills of granite also dominate the scenery inland from Aberdeen, including the Hill of Fare (471 m OD), Brimmond Hill (266 m OD) and Kerloch (534 m OD). Many of the rocks of the district have been deeply weathered and these weakened strata have been eroded into wide basins, for example the basic igneous rocks around Maud and Insch [[Media:P915249.png|(P915249)]]. However, some basic rocks are relatively fresh and form isolated hills, such as the broad ridge that extends from Pitgavenny Hill (236 m OD) towards Belhelvie. Another belt of high ground largely underlain by granite forms the eastern continuation of The Mounth. It is bounded to the south by the Highland Boundary Fault and to the north by the Dee valley, which is a major topographic corridor descending from the Gaick Plateau and the Cairngorm Mountains to the west of the district. The extreme south of the district falls within the gently undulating vale of Strathmore, which is underlain mainly by Old Red Sandstone lithologies and associated late Silurian to Devonian volcanic rocks. Although Strathmore is generally low lying, conglomerates near the Highland Boundary Fault form ridges parallel to the fault and volcanic rocks form hills such as Hill of Bruxie (216 m), south-west of Stonehaven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal communities of the district owe their existence mainly to the fishing industry, whereas those inland have relied on farming. Both industries have been in decline in recent years. Beef production was once prevalent, but arable farming has become increasingly important following the application of modern methods of land drainage to the notoriously poorly drained and stony soils of the region. Indeed, much of the Buchan Plateau now resembles parts of East Anglia following the widespread removal of boulders and stone walls. The production of aggregates makes an important contribution to the local economy, but the large stone quarrying industries formerly centred on the granites of Aberdeen and Peterhead have gone. Peat is still worked commercially around Strichen, but all of the clay-based brick and tile works in the district have closed. Forestry has become increasingly important, especially in the west of the area, but provides relatively little employment. Tourism is a steady, albeit mainly seasonal industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt, the North Sea oil- and gas-related industries are the mainstays of the present economy of northeast Scotland. However, while they have provided much-needed employment and wealth, they have brought about, or speeded up, irrevocable demographic and other changes across the region. This is especially so in the vicinities of Aberdeen and Peterhead where there has been a significant increase in population during the past 25 years or so. Large numbers of people have moved in from farther south. House prices have risen substantially and the increased demand for housing has placed pressures on local authorities to release land for building, some of which is not entirely suitable for such purposes (e.g. prone to flooding). Wage inflation has occurred causing the declining traditional activities to become uneconomic, especially the more marginal areas of agriculture where many hill farms have been bought to become residences and ‘hobby’ farms. There has been a dramatic increase in commuting across the entire region placing pressure on the infrastructure and leading to new road building and widespread road improvement projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland,_introduction&amp;diff=21726</id>
		<title>Cainozoic of north-east Scotland, introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland,_introduction&amp;diff=21726"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T11:00:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Introduction  =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915341.png|thumbnail|Summary of events preserved in the marine and onshore records. P915341.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The region described here (and referred henceforth as ‘the district’) spans the coastal hinterland and Buchan Plateau of north-east Scotland stretching from Elgin, on the southern coast of the Moray Firth, to Inverbervie, on the North Sea coast [[Media:P915248.png|(P915248)]]. This account summarises the Quaternary geology [[Media:P915341.png|(P915341)]] presented on the Drift (or Solid-and-Drift) editions of the 1:50 000 Series sheets 66 Banchory, 67 Stonehaven, 76E Inverurie, 86E Turriff, 87W Ellon, 87E Peterhead, 96W Portsoy, 96E Banff and 97 Fraserburgh. It also encompasses sheets 77 Aberdeen and 95 Elgin, for which modern memoirs including full descriptive accounts on the Quaternary are available. Details of the coverage and availability of maps, memoirs, sheet explanations and other publications are given in Information Sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Division of the Cainozoic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Era||Period (System)||Epoch (Series)||Age (of base Ma)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:middle;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; | CAINAZOIC&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | QUATERNARY&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Holocene||0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Pleistocene||2.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Pliocene||5.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |NEOGENE&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Miocene||23.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Oligocene||33.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |PALAEOGENE&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Eocene||54.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Paleocene||65.0&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this memoir is to consider landscape evolution throughout the Cainozoic era (table above), as well providing a description of the Quaternary deposits shown on the maps mentioned below. Many elements of the landscape were created prior to the Quaternary, and furthermore, important deposits of Palaeogene to Neogene age have been shown as drift deposits on some maps. Place names mentioned in the text and a selection of geomorphological features, deposits and other Cainozoic phenomena are shown on the following maps:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915248.png|thumbnail|Topography and geological sheet boundaries. P915248.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915371.png|Elgin district. P915371.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915372.png|Sheet 96W Portsoy. P915372.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915373.png|Sheet 96E Banff. P915373.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915374.png|Sheet 97 Fraserburgh. P915374.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915375.png|Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915376.png|Sheet 87W Ellon. P915376.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915377.png|Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915378.png|Sheet 76E Inverurie. P915378.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915379.png|Sheet 77 Aberdeen. P915379.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915380.png|Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915381.png|Sheet 67 Stonehaven. P915381.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915249.png|thumbnail|Solid geology of the district. P915249.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal lowlands of north-east Scotland flank the Grampian Highlands, which rise south-westwards towards the Cairngorm Mountains. Much of the district lies below the 250 m contour and is characterised by a series of ancient plateau surfaces eroded across a wide variety of rock types. The predominant surface is the rolling Buchan Plateau [[Media:P915248.png|(P915248)]] lying between 60 and 150 m OD. Only the most resistant quartzitic rocks form distinct hills, such as the conspicuous Mormond Hill (234 m OD), between Fraserburgh and Peterhead, and the more subdued Hill of Dudwick to the north-east of Ellon. The Buchan Plateau is crossed by a broad, gently undulating ridge that trends south-westwards from the coast at Troup Head (Sheet 96E) and which is developed mainly on relatively flat-lying Old Red Sandstone lithologies and Dalradian slates [[Media:P915249.png|(P915249)]]. Other similar trending ridges, some 220 to 310 m high, are formed mainly of steeply dipping Dalradian quartzite, and reach the high, rugged coastline of the Moray Firth between Banff and Portknockie. These ridges merge westwards, towards the River Spey, into a dissected plateau standing between 180 and 265 m OD. It is developed across Old Red Sandstone lithologies, Dalradian flaggy micaceous psammites and semipelites and more massive quartzites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P220387.jpg|left|thumbnail|View of Bennachie taken from the north-east. P220387.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Buchan Plateau is overlooked on its south-western margin by Bennachie (528 m OD) (Sheet 76E), a local granite landmark that has become part of the folklore of the region [[Media:P220387.jpg|(P220387)]]. Farther south, other large hills of granite also dominate the scenery inland from Aberdeen, including the Hill of Fare (471 m OD), Brimmond Hill (266 m OD) and Kerloch (534 m OD). Many of the rocks of the district have been deeply weathered and these weakened strata have been eroded into wide basins, for example the basic igneous rocks around Maud and Insch [[Media:P915249.png|(P915249)]]. However, some basic rocks are relatively fresh and form isolated hills, such as the broad ridge that extends from Pitgavenny Hill (236 m OD) towards Belhelvie. Another belt of high ground largely underlain by granite forms the eastern continuation of The Mounth. It is bounded to the south by the Highland Boundary Fault and to the north by the Dee valley, which is a major topographic corridor descending from the Gaick Plateau and the Cairngorm Mountains to the west of the district. The extreme south of the district falls within the gently undulating vale of Strathmore, which is underlain mainly by Old Red Sandstone lithologies and associated late Silurian to Devonian volcanic rocks. Although Strathmore is generally low lying, conglomerates near the Highland Boundary Fault form ridges parallel to the fault and volcanic rocks form hills such as Hill of Bruxie (216 m), south-west of Stonehaven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal communities of the district owe their existence mainly to the fishing industry, whereas those inland have relied on farming. Both industries have been in decline in recent years. Beef production was once prevalent, but arable farming has become increasingly important following the application of modern methods of land drainage to the notoriously poorly drained and stony soils of the region. Indeed, much of the Buchan Plateau now resembles parts of East Anglia following the widespread removal of boulders and stone walls. The production of aggregates makes an important contribution to the local economy, but the large stone quarrying industries formerly centred on the granites of Aberdeen and Peterhead have gone. Peat is still worked commercially around Strichen, but all of the clay-based brick and tile works in the district have closed. Forestry has become increasingly important, especially in the west of the area, but provides relatively little employment. Tourism is a steady, albeit mainly seasonal industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt, the North Sea oil- and gas-related industries are the mainstays of the present economy of northeast Scotland. However, while they have provided much-needed employment and wealth, they have brought about, or speeded up, irrevocable demographic and other changes across the region. This is especially so in the vicinities of Aberdeen and Peterhead where there has been a significant increase in population during the past 25 years or so. Large numbers of people have moved in from farther south. House prices have risen substantially and the increased demand for housing has placed pressures on local authorities to release land for building, some of which is not entirely suitable for such purposes (e.g. prone to flooding). Wage inflation has occurred causing the declining traditional activities to become uneconomic, especially the more marginal areas of agriculture where many hill farms have been bought to become residences and ‘hobby’ farms. There has been a dramatic increase in commuting across the entire region placing pressure on the infrastructure and leading to new road building and widespread road improvement projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland,_introduction&amp;diff=21725</id>
		<title>Cainozoic of north-east Scotland, introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland,_introduction&amp;diff=21725"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:57:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Introduction  =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915341.png|thumbnail|Summary of events preserved in the marine and onshore records. P915341.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The region described here (and referred henceforth as ‘the district’) spans the coastal hinterland and Buchan Plateau of north-east Scotland stretching from Elgin, on the southern coast of the Moray Firth, to Inverbervie, on the North Sea coast [[Media:P915248.png|(P915248)]]. This account summarises the Quaternary geology [[Media:P915341.png|(P915341)]] presented on the Drift (or Solid-and-Drift) editions of the 1:50 000 Series sheets 66 Banchory, 67 Stonehaven, 76E Inverurie, 86E Turriff, 87W Ellon, 87E Peterhead, 96W Portsoy, 96E Banff and 97 Fraserburgh. It also encompasses sheets 77 Aberdeen and 95 Elgin, for which modern memoirs including full descriptive accounts on the Quaternary are available. Details of the coverage and availability of maps, memoirs, sheet explanations and other publications are given in Information Sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Division of the Cainozoic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Era||Period (System)||Epoch (Series)||Age (of base Ma)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:middle;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; | CAINAZOIC&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; | QUATERNARY&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Holocene||0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Pleistocene||2.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Pliocene||5.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |NEOGENE&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Miocene||23.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Oligocene||33.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |PALAEOGENE&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Eocene||54.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; |Paleocene||65.0&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this memoir is to consider landscape evolution throughout the Cainozoic era (table above), as well providing a description of the Quaternary deposits shown on the maps mentioned below. Many elements of the landscape were created prior to the Quaternary, and furthermore, important deposits of Palaeogene to Neogene age have been shown as drift deposits on some maps. Place names mentioned in the text and a selection of geomorphological features, deposits and other Cainozoic phenomena are shown on the following maps:&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915371.png|Elgin district. P915371.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915372.png|Sheet 96W Portsoy. P915372.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915373.png|Sheet 96E Banff. P915373.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915374.png|Sheet 97 Fraserburgh. P915374.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915375.png|Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915376.png|Sheet 87W Ellon. P915376.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915377.png|Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915378.png|Sheet 76E Inverurie. P915378.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915379.png|Sheet 77 Aberdeen. P915379.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915380.png|Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Media:P915381.png|Sheet 67 Stonehaven. P915381.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915248.png|left|thumbnail|Topography and geological sheet boundaries. P915248.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915249.png|thumbnail|Solid geology of the district. P915249.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal lowlands of north-east Scotland flank the Grampian Highlands, which rise south-westwards towards the Cairngorm Mountains. Much of the district lies below the 250 m contour and is characterised by a series of ancient plateau surfaces eroded across a wide variety of rock types. The predominant surface is the rolling Buchan Plateau [[Media:P915248.png|(P915248)]] lying between 60 and 150 m OD. Only the most resistant quartzitic rocks form distinct hills, such as the conspicuous Mormond Hill (234 m OD), between Fraserburgh and Peterhead, and the more subdued Hill of Dudwick to the north-east of Ellon. The Buchan Plateau is crossed by a broad, gently undulating ridge that trends south-westwards from the coast at Troup Head (Sheet 96E) and which is developed mainly on relatively flat-lying Old Red Sandstone lithologies and Dalradian slates [[Media:P915249.png|(P915249)]]. Other similar trending ridges, some 220 to 310 m high, are formed mainly of steeply dipping Dalradian quartzite, and reach the high, rugged coastline of the Moray Firth between Banff and Portknockie. These ridges merge westwards, towards the River Spey, into a dissected plateau standing between 180 and 265 m OD. It is developed across Old Red Sandstone lithologies, Dalradian flaggy micaceous psammites and semipelites and more massive quartzites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P220387.jpg|left|thumbnail|View of Bennachie taken from the north-east. P220387.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Buchan Plateau is overlooked on its south-western margin by Bennachie (528 m OD) (Sheet 76E), a local granite landmark that has become part of the folklore of the region [[Media:P220387.jpg|(P220387)]]. Farther south, other large hills of granite also dominate the scenery inland from Aberdeen, including the Hill of Fare (471 m OD), Brimmond Hill (266 m OD) and Kerloch (534 m OD). Many of the rocks of the district have been deeply weathered and these weakened strata have been eroded into wide basins, for example the basic igneous rocks around Maud and Insch [[Media:P915249.png|(P915249)]]. However, some basic rocks are relatively fresh and form isolated hills, such as the broad ridge that extends from Pitgavenny Hill (236 m OD) towards Belhelvie. Another belt of high ground largely underlain by granite forms the eastern continuation of The Mounth. It is bounded to the south by the Highland Boundary Fault and to the north by the Dee valley, which is a major topographic corridor descending from the Gaick Plateau and the Cairngorm Mountains to the west of the district. The extreme south of the district falls within the gently undulating vale of Strathmore, which is underlain mainly by Old Red Sandstone lithologies and associated late Silurian to Devonian volcanic rocks. Although Strathmore is generally low lying, conglomerates near the Highland Boundary Fault form ridges parallel to the fault and volcanic rocks form hills such as Hill of Bruxie (216 m), south-west of Stonehaven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal communities of the district owe their existence mainly to the fishing industry, whereas those inland have relied on farming. Both industries have been in decline in recent years. Beef production was once prevalent, but arable farming has become increasingly important following the application of modern methods of land drainage to the notoriously poorly drained and stony soils of the region. Indeed, much of the Buchan Plateau now resembles parts of East Anglia following the widespread removal of boulders and stone walls. The production of aggregates makes an important contribution to the local economy, but the large stone quarrying industries formerly centred on the granites of Aberdeen and Peterhead have gone. Peat is still worked commercially around Strichen, but all of the clay-based brick and tile works in the district have closed. Forestry has become increasingly important, especially in the west of the area, but provides relatively little employment. Tourism is a steady, albeit mainly seasonal industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt, the North Sea oil- and gas-related industries are the mainstays of the present economy of northeast Scotland. However, while they have provided much-needed employment and wealth, they have brought about, or speeded up, irrevocable demographic and other changes across the region. This is especially so in the vicinities of Aberdeen and Peterhead where there has been a significant increase in population during the past 25 years or so. Large numbers of people have moved in from farther south. House prices have risen substantially and the increased demand for housing has placed pressures on local authorities to release land for building, some of which is not entirely suitable for such purposes (e.g. prone to flooding). Wage inflation has occurred causing the declining traditional activities to become uneconomic, especially the more marginal areas of agriculture where many hill farms have been bought to become residences and ‘hobby’ farms. There has been a dramatic increase in commuting across the entire region placing pressure on the infrastructure and leading to new road building and widespread road improvement projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21724</id>
		<title>Results of shallow geophysical surveys, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21724"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:56:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Ground probing radar traverses */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Results of shallow geophysical surveys =&lt;br /&gt;
During surveys of the Cainozoic deposits in north-east Scotland various shallow geophysical techniques have been used to provide data on the nature, thickness and lateral extent of concealed sedimentary units ([[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)#Two Applied geology|Applied geology]]). Interpretation of electrical conductivity and resistivity measurements, in particular, has also provided insights into the lateral heterogeneity typical of the surface deposits of the district.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conductivity survey ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|left|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915337.png|thumbnail|Houff or Ury area. P915337.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The methods employed and the results from a conductivity survey in the vicinity of the Houff of Ury (NO 856 889), near Stonehaven, and the resistivity soundings from the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel assessment area (MAR 148 on [[Media:P915334.png|P915334]]), are fully described in Auton et al. (1988) and Auton (1992). Both techniques provided insights into the three dimensional distribution of workable deposits of sand and gravel, augmenting the surface mapping information. For example, interpretation of a contoured plot of ground conductivity values in the Houff of Ury area ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] a), in conjunction with detailed geological mapping, resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in the estimated extent of sand and gravel, compared with that recorded during the primary geological survey of the area in 1884. It also led to the recognition of minor, but notable amounts of workable sand and gravel ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] b) concealed beneath thin till overburden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistivity surveys ==&lt;br /&gt;
Forty three resistivity depth soundings were taken at 25 sites during the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel resource survey. The soundings, together with data obtained from 173 sample points (trial pits, exposures and boreholes) were used to characterise the Quaternary sequences in the area. Eight of the resistivity sites were positioned close to sample points to allow calibration of resistivity values. The calibrated results enhanced extrapolation of the nature and thickness of deposits between sample points, particularly in the major river valleys, where the full thickness of water saturated material was commonly not proved by pitting and shallow drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915338.png|thumbnail|Frequency distribution of interpreted resistivity values from the Banchory-Stonehaven area. P915338.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The soundings also provided data on the typical range of resistivities for each type of Quaternary deposit encountered [[Media:P915338.png|(P915338)]]. For example, resistivity values for ‘clayey’ materials, such as till and hummocky glacial deposits, were low, ranging from about 18 to 300 ohm m, whereas values for sand and gravel were high, ranging from 400 to 10 000 ohm m. The range of resistivity values obtained from 44 soundings taken in the adjacent Strachan-Auchenblae–Catterline assessment area (Auton et al., 1990) was somewhat larger. Values of 175 to 700 ohm m were obtained for tills, and 10 000 to 17 000 ohm m for sands and gravels of the East Grampian Drift Group in the Strachan area; values of 150 to 900 ohm m (till) and 300 to 6000 ohm m (sand and gravel) were recorded for deposits of the Mearns Drift Group, between Auchenblae and Catterline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Differences between the ranges of values obtained from the two assessment areas were probably, in part, a reflection of moisture content, particularly in the permeable, sandy Quaternary strata, at the time of survey. The Inverurie–Stonehaven soundings were taken when the ground was wet, in early spring, whereas the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline soundings were made when the ground was dry, at the end of a notably dry summer. The resistivity values for tills of the East Grampian and Mearns drift groups are very similar in the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline area, and comparable to many of those recorded from tills in the Inverurie–Stonehaven area. The resistivity values from sands and gravels of the Mearns Drift Group are generally lower than those from the East Grampian Drift Group and probably reflect the finer grained and more silty nature of the former deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resistivity contrast between permeable sand and gravel, and less permeable deposits (till, glaciolacustrine silt and clay) was evident in both assessment surveys allowing clear subdivision of the Quaternary sequences, based on their geophysical signature. However, the contrast between Quaternary deposits and bedrock was generally less evident and in places accurate rockhead depth was difficult to determine without nearby borehole control. The resistivity values obtained for the Quaternary sediments in north-east Scotland are generally much higher than those in southern Britain (Auton, 1992). This reflects, in part, the crystalline or sandy nature of the resistant bedrock parent material, incorporated in the Quaternary deposits of the district, and also the high proportion of boulders and cobbles in the sediments. In southern England, in particular, much of the fine-grained material in glacigenic sediments is derived from mudstone bedrock and large clasts are normally less numerous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ground probing radar traverses ==&lt;br /&gt;
The two ground probing radar (GPR) traverses (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), each about 750 m in length, were undertaken in the Houff of Ury area (sited on [[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] a). They provided data on the lateral extent and sedimentary architecture of the Quaternary deposits beyond what could be gleaned from surface mapping, conductivity measurements and the sinking of boreholes and trial pits (Greenwood et al., 1995). Gently inclined reflectors were interpreted as corresponding with large-scale foreset bedding typical of glaciofluvial deltaic deposits within the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the area. These deltas form rounded and flat-topped mounds. Organised, quiet, layered patterns of reflectors, are thought to be typical of flat-lying glaciolacustrine deposits (Ury Silts Formation) infilling shallow ice-scoured rock basins. The glaciolacustrine sediments typically comprise silty, fine-grained sand and sandy silt. Multiple diffractions, typical of pebble and cobble gravel, were seen beneath topographic highs. These correspond to gravelly deltaic topset beds; the gently inclined reflectors indicating foreset bedding are developed on the flanks of the topographic highs. Lower amplitude diffraction patterns, indicating sediments containing scattered boulders and cobbles, were seen to be characteristic of till overlying Dalradian metamorphic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915339.png|left|thumbnail|Buchan Ridge. Location of GPR traverses and resistivity soundings and interpreted GPR profile. P915339.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Four GPR traverses ([[Media:P915339.png|P915339]] a) were made across the type area of the Buchan Ridge Gravel Member at Moss of Cruden, during 1994, to image the internal geometry of the deposit and the form of its basal contact with the underlying bedrock. A short traverse was also undertaken along a track through a forestry plantation at Moss of Auquharney (NJ 023 397), some 150 m south of the type area. The resulting profiles (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), together with data from trial pits, boreholes, and resistivity soundings provided important evidence bearing on the origin of the gravel ([[Palaeogene and Neogene deposits, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Palaeogene and Neogene deposits]]; Site 14 [[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Moss of Cruden]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most informative GPR profile (line 1) is almost coincident with the pitting transect A1–A of Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3), across the northern slope of the ridge at Moss of Cruden. Part of the north-west to south-east profile, (162–364 m) is shown in [[Media:P915339.png|P915339]] b. The series of shallow-dipping, well-ordered reflections (without diffractions) indicates undisturbed Palaeogene to Neogene gravel (Buchan Ridge Gravel Member), with low-angle cross-stratification dipping towards the axis of the ridge. Farther up-slope (276–342 m), the GPR reflectors are distorted by diffractions that may indicate periglacial and glacitectonic disturbance of the upper part of the gravel. The profile shows the cross-stratified gravel unit thinning north-westwards, confirming that its feather edge rests on weathered Lower Cretaceous sandstone and Caledonian granitic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cretaceous Moreseat Sandstone, which is largely decomposed to soft sandy silt and silty sand, is characterised by a diminution in radar reflectivity. This was only clearly imaged toward the north-western end of the profile (Greenwood et al.,1995, fig.5, 80–100 m). The resistivity depth probes and radar indicate that around 25 m of Buchan Ridge Gravel lies beneath the crest of the ridge, infilling a channel running parallel to the line of the ridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915340.png|thumbnail|Buchan Ridge resistivity model. P915340.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretation of resistivity data from Moss of Cruden has allowed modelling of resistivity values for parts of the sequence encountered in the GPR profile 1 [[Media:P915340.png|(P915340)]]. The topsoil is characterised by high resistivity values (2675–5940 ohm m) and the upper parts of the Buchan Ridge Gravel display a range of lower resistivities (447–2534 ohm m). This is thought to be due, in part, to variations in the proportions of kaolinised granitic clasts throughout the unit, the presence of interbeds of clayey pebbly sand (known from the upper part of the gravel sequence in Borehole NK 04 SW3) and the disturbance of bedding, indicated by distorted diffractions in the GPR profile. A layer, about 10 m thick, displaying relatively uniform low resistivities (307–355 ohm m) occurs below the ‘disturbed’ gravel at sounding sites MOSS and M1-285; it reaches the surface at M1-225. Its uniform resistivity response is taken to indicate that this gravel (with its shallow-dipping, well-ordered GPR reflections) is little disturbed and generally contains more kaolinitic material, in the form of decomposed granite cobbles and as fine-grained matrix, than the overlying ‘disturbed’ material. The absence of the latter in sounding M1-225, suggests that the upper ‘disturbed’ units are only well preserved where the gravel is thickest (towards the crest of the ridge); they have probably been removed on the flanks of the ridge by glacial erosion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of Moreseat Sandstone, infilling a topographic depression in deeply decomposed granite bedrock (between M1-225 and MOSS), is suggested by a 120 ohm m layer at the base of sounding M1-285 and corroborated by the trial pitting results reported by Hall and Jarvis (1994). A value of 120 ohm m is lower than might be expected for sandstone, but is comparable to values of 76–97 ohm m obtained for decomposed Devonian sandy siltstone from the Stonehaven–Auchenblae area (Auton et al., 1990). The very low resistivity (22 ohm m) layer from about 112 to 95 m above OD in sounding M-225, corresponds to grussified granitic bedrock recorded at the bottom of trial pit 15 in Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3). Similar (29.5 ohm m) deeply weathered material, some 23 m thick, overlies fresh granite bedrock (3640 ohm m) in sounding MOSS on the ridge crest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five GPR traverses were also made (in 1994) across the type area of the Windy Hills Gravel Member (Greenwood et al., 1995). The interpreted GPR data are incorporated in the description of the [[Windyhills - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Windy Hills]] site (see also [[Palaeogene and Neogene deposits, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Palaeogene and Neogene deposits]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21723</id>
		<title>Results of shallow geophysical surveys, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21723"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:55:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Ground probing radar traverses */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Results of shallow geophysical surveys =&lt;br /&gt;
During surveys of the Cainozoic deposits in north-east Scotland various shallow geophysical techniques have been used to provide data on the nature, thickness and lateral extent of concealed sedimentary units ([[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)#Two Applied geology|Applied geology]]). Interpretation of electrical conductivity and resistivity measurements, in particular, has also provided insights into the lateral heterogeneity typical of the surface deposits of the district.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conductivity survey ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|left|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915337.png|thumbnail|Houff or Ury area. P915337.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The methods employed and the results from a conductivity survey in the vicinity of the Houff of Ury (NO 856 889), near Stonehaven, and the resistivity soundings from the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel assessment area (MAR 148 on [[Media:P915334.png|P915334]]), are fully described in Auton et al. (1988) and Auton (1992). Both techniques provided insights into the three dimensional distribution of workable deposits of sand and gravel, augmenting the surface mapping information. For example, interpretation of a contoured plot of ground conductivity values in the Houff of Ury area ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] a), in conjunction with detailed geological mapping, resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in the estimated extent of sand and gravel, compared with that recorded during the primary geological survey of the area in 1884. It also led to the recognition of minor, but notable amounts of workable sand and gravel ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] b) concealed beneath thin till overburden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistivity surveys ==&lt;br /&gt;
Forty three resistivity depth soundings were taken at 25 sites during the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel resource survey. The soundings, together with data obtained from 173 sample points (trial pits, exposures and boreholes) were used to characterise the Quaternary sequences in the area. Eight of the resistivity sites were positioned close to sample points to allow calibration of resistivity values. The calibrated results enhanced extrapolation of the nature and thickness of deposits between sample points, particularly in the major river valleys, where the full thickness of water saturated material was commonly not proved by pitting and shallow drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915338.png|thumbnail|Frequency distribution of interpreted resistivity values from the Banchory-Stonehaven area. P915338.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The soundings also provided data on the typical range of resistivities for each type of Quaternary deposit encountered [[Media:P915338.png|(P915338)]]. For example, resistivity values for ‘clayey’ materials, such as till and hummocky glacial deposits, were low, ranging from about 18 to 300 ohm m, whereas values for sand and gravel were high, ranging from 400 to 10 000 ohm m. The range of resistivity values obtained from 44 soundings taken in the adjacent Strachan-Auchenblae–Catterline assessment area (Auton et al., 1990) was somewhat larger. Values of 175 to 700 ohm m were obtained for tills, and 10 000 to 17 000 ohm m for sands and gravels of the East Grampian Drift Group in the Strachan area; values of 150 to 900 ohm m (till) and 300 to 6000 ohm m (sand and gravel) were recorded for deposits of the Mearns Drift Group, between Auchenblae and Catterline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Differences between the ranges of values obtained from the two assessment areas were probably, in part, a reflection of moisture content, particularly in the permeable, sandy Quaternary strata, at the time of survey. The Inverurie–Stonehaven soundings were taken when the ground was wet, in early spring, whereas the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline soundings were made when the ground was dry, at the end of a notably dry summer. The resistivity values for tills of the East Grampian and Mearns drift groups are very similar in the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline area, and comparable to many of those recorded from tills in the Inverurie–Stonehaven area. The resistivity values from sands and gravels of the Mearns Drift Group are generally lower than those from the East Grampian Drift Group and probably reflect the finer grained and more silty nature of the former deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resistivity contrast between permeable sand and gravel, and less permeable deposits (till, glaciolacustrine silt and clay) was evident in both assessment surveys allowing clear subdivision of the Quaternary sequences, based on their geophysical signature. However, the contrast between Quaternary deposits and bedrock was generally less evident and in places accurate rockhead depth was difficult to determine without nearby borehole control. The resistivity values obtained for the Quaternary sediments in north-east Scotland are generally much higher than those in southern Britain (Auton, 1992). This reflects, in part, the crystalline or sandy nature of the resistant bedrock parent material, incorporated in the Quaternary deposits of the district, and also the high proportion of boulders and cobbles in the sediments. In southern England, in particular, much of the fine-grained material in glacigenic sediments is derived from mudstone bedrock and large clasts are normally less numerous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ground probing radar traverses ==&lt;br /&gt;
The two ground probing radar (GPR) traverses (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), each about 750 m in length, were undertaken in the Houff of Ury area (sited on [[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] a). They provided data on the lateral extent and sedimentary architecture of the Quaternary deposits beyond what could be gleaned from surface mapping, conductivity measurements and the sinking of boreholes and trial pits (Greenwood et al., 1995). Gently inclined reflectors were interpreted as corresponding with large-scale foreset bedding typical of glaciofluvial deltaic deposits within the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the area. These deltas form rounded and flat-topped mounds. Organised, quiet, layered patterns of reflectors, are thought to be typical of flat-lying glaciolacustrine deposits (Ury Silts Formation) infilling shallow ice-scoured rock basins. The glaciolacustrine sediments typically comprise silty, fine-grained sand and sandy silt. Multiple diffractions, typical of pebble and cobble gravel, were seen beneath topographic highs. These correspond to gravelly deltaic topset beds; the gently inclined reflectors indicating foreset bedding are developed on the flanks of the topographic highs. Lower amplitude diffraction patterns, indicating sediments containing scattered boulders and cobbles, were seen to be characteristic of till overlying Dalradian metamorphic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915339.png|thumbnail|Buchan Ridge. Location of GPR traverses and resistivity soundings and interpreted GPR profile. P915339.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Four GPR traverses ([[Media:P915339.png|P915339]] a) were made across the type area of the Buchan Ridge Gravel Member at Moss of Cruden, during 1994, to image the internal geometry of the deposit and the form of its basal contact with the underlying bedrock. A short traverse was also undertaken along a track through a forestry plantation at Moss of Auquharney (NJ 023 397), some 150 m south of the type area. The resulting profiles (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), together with data from trial pits, boreholes, and resistivity soundings provided important evidence bearing on the origin of the gravel ([[Palaeogene and Neogene deposits, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Palaeogene and Neogene deposits]]; Site 14 [[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Moss of Cruden]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most informative GPR profile (line 1) is almost coincident with the pitting transect A1–A of Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3), across the northern slope of the ridge at Moss of Cruden. Part of the north-west to south-east profile, (162–364 m) is shown in [[Media:P915339.png|P915339]] b. The series of shallow-dipping, well-ordered reflections (without diffractions) indicates undisturbed Palaeogene to Neogene gravel (Buchan Ridge Gravel Member), with low-angle cross-stratification dipping towards the axis of the ridge. Farther up-slope (276–342 m), the GPR reflectors are distorted by diffractions that may indicate periglacial and glacitectonic disturbance of the upper part of the gravel. The profile shows the cross-stratified gravel unit thinning north-westwards, confirming that its feather edge rests on weathered Lower Cretaceous sandstone and Caledonian granitic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cretaceous Moreseat Sandstone, which is largely decomposed to soft sandy silt and silty sand, is characterised by a diminution in radar reflectivity. This was only clearly imaged toward the north-western end of the profile (Greenwood et al.,1995, fig.5, 80–100 m). The resistivity depth probes and radar indicate that around 25 m of Buchan Ridge Gravel lies beneath the crest of the ridge, infilling a channel running parallel to the line of the ridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915340.png|thumbnail|Buchan Ridge resistivity model. P915340.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretation of resistivity data from Moss of Cruden has allowed modelling of resistivity values for parts of the sequence encountered in the GPR profile 1 [[Media:P915340.png|(P915340)]]. The topsoil is characterised by high resistivity values (2675–5940 ohm m) and the upper parts of the Buchan Ridge Gravel display a range of lower resistivities (447–2534 ohm m). This is thought to be due, in part, to variations in the proportions of kaolinised granitic clasts throughout the unit, the presence of interbeds of clayey pebbly sand (known from the upper part of the gravel sequence in Borehole NK 04 SW3) and the disturbance of bedding, indicated by distorted diffractions in the GPR profile. A layer, about 10 m thick, displaying relatively uniform low resistivities (307–355 ohm m) occurs below the ‘disturbed’ gravel at sounding sites MOSS and M1-285; it reaches the surface at M1-225. Its uniform resistivity response is taken to indicate that this gravel (with its shallow-dipping, well-ordered GPR reflections) is little disturbed and generally contains more kaolinitic material, in the form of decomposed granite cobbles and as fine-grained matrix, than the overlying ‘disturbed’ material. The absence of the latter in sounding M1-225, suggests that the upper ‘disturbed’ units are only well preserved where the gravel is thickest (towards the crest of the ridge); they have probably been removed on the flanks of the ridge by glacial erosion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of Moreseat Sandstone, infilling a topographic depression in deeply decomposed granite bedrock (between M1-225 and MOSS), is suggested by a 120 ohm m layer at the base of sounding M1-285 and corroborated by the trial pitting results reported by Hall and Jarvis (1994). A value of 120 ohm m is lower than might be expected for sandstone, but is comparable to values of 76–97 ohm m obtained for decomposed Devonian sandy siltstone from the Stonehaven–Auchenblae area (Auton et al., 1990). The very low resistivity (22 ohm m) layer from about 112 to 95 m above OD in sounding M-225, corresponds to grussified granitic bedrock recorded at the bottom of trial pit 15 in Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3). Similar (29.5 ohm m) deeply weathered material, some 23 m thick, overlies fresh granite bedrock (3640 ohm m) in sounding MOSS on the ridge crest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five GPR traverses were also made (in 1994) across the type area of the Windy Hills Gravel Member (Greenwood et al., 1995). The interpreted GPR data are incorporated in the description of the [[Windyhills - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Windy Hills]] site (see also [[Palaeogene and Neogene deposits, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Palaeogene and Neogene deposits]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21722</id>
		<title>Results of shallow geophysical surveys, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21722"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:43:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Resistivity surveys */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Results of shallow geophysical surveys =&lt;br /&gt;
During surveys of the Cainozoic deposits in north-east Scotland various shallow geophysical techniques have been used to provide data on the nature, thickness and lateral extent of concealed sedimentary units ([[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)#Two Applied geology|Applied geology]]). Interpretation of electrical conductivity and resistivity measurements, in particular, has also provided insights into the lateral heterogeneity typical of the surface deposits of the district.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conductivity survey ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|left|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915337.png|thumbnail|Houff or Ury area. P915337.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The methods employed and the results from a conductivity survey in the vicinity of the Houff of Ury (NO 856 889), near Stonehaven, and the resistivity soundings from the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel assessment area (MAR 148 on [[Media:P915334.png|P915334]]), are fully described in Auton et al. (1988) and Auton (1992). Both techniques provided insights into the three dimensional distribution of workable deposits of sand and gravel, augmenting the surface mapping information. For example, interpretation of a contoured plot of ground conductivity values in the Houff of Ury area ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] a), in conjunction with detailed geological mapping, resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in the estimated extent of sand and gravel, compared with that recorded during the primary geological survey of the area in 1884. It also led to the recognition of minor, but notable amounts of workable sand and gravel ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] b) concealed beneath thin till overburden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistivity surveys ==&lt;br /&gt;
Forty three resistivity depth soundings were taken at 25 sites during the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel resource survey. The soundings, together with data obtained from 173 sample points (trial pits, exposures and boreholes) were used to characterise the Quaternary sequences in the area. Eight of the resistivity sites were positioned close to sample points to allow calibration of resistivity values. The calibrated results enhanced extrapolation of the nature and thickness of deposits between sample points, particularly in the major river valleys, where the full thickness of water saturated material was commonly not proved by pitting and shallow drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915338.png|thumbnail|Frequency distribution of interpreted resistivity values from the Banchory-Stonehaven area. P915338.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The soundings also provided data on the typical range of resistivities for each type of Quaternary deposit encountered [[Media:P915338.png|(P915338)]]. For example, resistivity values for ‘clayey’ materials, such as till and hummocky glacial deposits, were low, ranging from about 18 to 300 ohm m, whereas values for sand and gravel were high, ranging from 400 to 10 000 ohm m. The range of resistivity values obtained from 44 soundings taken in the adjacent Strachan-Auchenblae–Catterline assessment area (Auton et al., 1990) was somewhat larger. Values of 175 to 700 ohm m were obtained for tills, and 10 000 to 17 000 ohm m for sands and gravels of the East Grampian Drift Group in the Strachan area; values of 150 to 900 ohm m (till) and 300 to 6000 ohm m (sand and gravel) were recorded for deposits of the Mearns Drift Group, between Auchenblae and Catterline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Differences between the ranges of values obtained from the two assessment areas were probably, in part, a reflection of moisture content, particularly in the permeable, sandy Quaternary strata, at the time of survey. The Inverurie–Stonehaven soundings were taken when the ground was wet, in early spring, whereas the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline soundings were made when the ground was dry, at the end of a notably dry summer. The resistivity values for tills of the East Grampian and Mearns drift groups are very similar in the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline area, and comparable to many of those recorded from tills in the Inverurie–Stonehaven area. The resistivity values from sands and gravels of the Mearns Drift Group are generally lower than those from the East Grampian Drift Group and probably reflect the finer grained and more silty nature of the former deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resistivity contrast between permeable sand and gravel, and less permeable deposits (till, glaciolacustrine silt and clay) was evident in both assessment surveys allowing clear subdivision of the Quaternary sequences, based on their geophysical signature. However, the contrast between Quaternary deposits and bedrock was generally less evident and in places accurate rockhead depth was difficult to determine without nearby borehole control. The resistivity values obtained for the Quaternary sediments in north-east Scotland are generally much higher than those in southern Britain (Auton, 1992). This reflects, in part, the crystalline or sandy nature of the resistant bedrock parent material, incorporated in the Quaternary deposits of the district, and also the high proportion of boulders and cobbles in the sediments. In southern England, in particular, much of the fine-grained material in glacigenic sediments is derived from mudstone bedrock and large clasts are normally less numerous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ground probing radar traverses ==&lt;br /&gt;
The two ground probing radar (GPR) traverses (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), each about 750 m in length, were undertaken in the Houff of Ury area (sited on P915337 a). They provided data on the lateral extent and sedimentary architecture of the Quaternary deposits beyond what could be gleaned from surface mapping, conductivity measurements and the sinking of boreholes and trial pits (Greenwood et al., 1995). Gently inclined reflectors were interpreted as corresponding with large-scale foreset bedding typical of glaciofluvial deltaic deposits within the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the area. These deltas form rounded and flat-topped mounds. Organised, quiet, layered patterns of reflectors, are thought to be typical of flat-lying glaciolacustrine deposits (Ury Silts Formation) infilling shallow ice-scoured rock basins. The glaciolacustrine sediments typically comprise silty, fine-grained sand and sandy silt. Multiple diffractions, typical of pebble and cobble gravel, were seen beneath topographic highs. These correspond to gravelly deltaic topset beds; the gently inclined reflectors indicating foreset bedding are developed on the flanks of the topographic highs. Lower amplitude diffraction patterns, indicating sediments containing scattered boulders and cobbles, were seen to be characteristic of till overlying Dalradian metamorphic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four GPR traverses (P915339 a) were made across the type area of the Buchan Ridge Gravel Member at Moss of Cruden, during 1994, to image the internal geometry of the deposit and the form of its basal contact with the underlying bedrock. A short traverse was also undertaken along a track through a forestry plantation at Moss of Auquharney (NJ 023 397), some 150 m south of the type area. The resulting profiles (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), together with data from trial pits, boreholes, and resistivity soundings provided important evidence bearing on the origin of the gravel (Chapter 4; Appendix 1Site 14).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most informative GPR profile (line 1) is almost coincident with the pitting transect A1–A of Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3), across the northern slope of the ridge at Moss of Cruden. Part of the north-west to south-east profile, (162–364 m) is shown in P915339 b. The series of shallow-dipping, well-ordered reflections (without diffractions) indicates undisturbed Palaeogene to Neogene gravel (Buchan Ridge Gravel Member), with low-angle cross-stratification dipping towards the axis of the ridge. Farther up-slope (276–342 m), the GPR reflectors are distorted by diffractions that may indicate periglacial and glacitectonic disturbance of the upper part of the gravel. The profile shows the cross-stratified gravel unit thinning north-westwards, confirming that its feather edge rests on weathered Lower Cretaceous sandstone and Caledonian granitic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cretaceous Moreseat Sandstone, which is largely decomposed to soft sandy silt and silty sand, is characterised by a diminution in radar reflectivity. This was only clearly imaged toward the north-western end of the profile (Greenwood et al.,1995, fig.5, 80–100 m). The resistivity depth probes and radar indicate that around 25 m of Buchan Ridge Gravel lies beneath the crest of the ridge, infilling a channel running parallel to the line of the ridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretation of resistivity data from Moss of Cruden has allowed modelling of resistivity values for parts of the sequence encountered in the GPR profile 1 (P915340). The topsoil is characterised by high resistivity values (2675–5940 ohm m) and the upper parts of the Buchan Ridge Gravel display a range of lower resistivities (447–2534 ohm m). This is thought to be due, in part, to variations in the proportions of kaolinised granitic clasts throughout the unit, the presence of interbeds of clayey pebbly sand (known from the upper part of the gravel sequence in Borehole NK 04 SW3) and the disturbance of bedding, indicated by distorted diffractions in the GPR profile. A layer, about 10 m thick, displaying relatively uniform low resistivities (307–355 ohm m) occurs below the ‘disturbed’ gravel at sounding sites MOSS and M1-285; it reaches the surface at M1-225. Its uniform resistivity response is taken to indicate that this gravel (with its shallow-dipping, well-ordered GPR reflections) is little disturbed and generally contains more kaolinitic material, in the form of decomposed granite cobbles and as fine-grained matrix, than the overlying ‘disturbed’ material. The absence of the latter in sounding M1-225, suggests that the upper ‘disturbed’ units are only well preserved where the gravel is thickest (towards the crest of the ridge); they have probably been removed on the flanks of the ridge by glacial erosion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of Moreseat Sandstone, infilling a topographic depression in deeply decomposed granite bedrock (between M1-225 and MOSS), is suggested by a 120 ohm m layer at the base of sounding M1-285 and corroborated by the trial pitting results reported by Hall and Jarvis (1994). A value of 120 ohm m is lower than might be expected for sandstone, but is comparable to values of 76–97 ohm m obtained for decomposed Devonian sandy siltstone from the Stonehaven–Auchenblae area (Auton et al., 1990). The very low resistivity (22 ohm m) layer from about 112 to 95 m above OD in sounding M-225, corresponds to grussified granitic bedrock recorded at the bottom of trial pit 15 in Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3). Similar (29.5 ohm m) deeply weathered material, some 23 m thick, overlies fresh granite bedrock (3640 ohm m) in sounding MOSS on the ridge crest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five GPR traverses were also made (in 1994) across the type area of the Windy Hills Gravel Member (Greenwood et al., 1995). The interpreted GPR data are incorporated in the description of the Windy Hills site given in Appendix 1 (see also Chapter 4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21721</id>
		<title>Results of shallow geophysical surveys, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21721"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:42:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Conductivity survey */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Results of shallow geophysical surveys =&lt;br /&gt;
During surveys of the Cainozoic deposits in north-east Scotland various shallow geophysical techniques have been used to provide data on the nature, thickness and lateral extent of concealed sedimentary units ([[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)#Two Applied geology|Applied geology]]). Interpretation of electrical conductivity and resistivity measurements, in particular, has also provided insights into the lateral heterogeneity typical of the surface deposits of the district.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conductivity survey ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|left|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915337.png|thumbnail|Houff or Ury area. P915337.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The methods employed and the results from a conductivity survey in the vicinity of the Houff of Ury (NO 856 889), near Stonehaven, and the resistivity soundings from the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel assessment area (MAR 148 on [[Media:P915334.png|P915334]]), are fully described in Auton et al. (1988) and Auton (1992). Both techniques provided insights into the three dimensional distribution of workable deposits of sand and gravel, augmenting the surface mapping information. For example, interpretation of a contoured plot of ground conductivity values in the Houff of Ury area ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] a), in conjunction with detailed geological mapping, resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in the estimated extent of sand and gravel, compared with that recorded during the primary geological survey of the area in 1884. It also led to the recognition of minor, but notable amounts of workable sand and gravel ([[Media:P915337.png|P915337]] b) concealed beneath thin till overburden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistivity surveys ==&lt;br /&gt;
Forty three resistivity depth soundings were taken at 25 sites during the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel resource survey. The soundings, together with data obtained from 173 sample points (trial pits, exposures and boreholes) were used to characterise the Quaternary sequences in the area. Eight of the resistivity sites were positioned close to sample points to allow calibration of resistivity values. The calibrated results enhanced extrapolation of the nature and thickness of deposits between sample points, particularly in the major river valleys, where the full thickness of water saturated material was commonly not proved by pitting and shallow drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soundings also provided data on the typical range of resistivities for each type of Quaternary deposit encountered (P915338). For example, resistivity values for ‘clayey’ materials, such as till and hummocky glacial deposits, were low, ranging from about 18 to 300 ohm m, whereas values for sand and gravel were high, ranging from 400 to 10 000 ohm m. The range of resistivity values obtained from 44 soundings taken in the adjacent Strachan-Auchenblae–Catterline assessment area (Auton et al., 1990) was somewhat larger. Values of 175 to 700 ohm m were obtained for tills, and 10 000 to 17 000 ohm m for sands and gravels of the East Grampian Drift Group in the Strachan area; values of 150 to 900 ohm m (till) and 300 to 6000 ohm m (sand and gravel) were recorded for deposits of the Mearns Drift Group, between Auchenblae and Catterline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Differences between the ranges of values obtained from the two assessment areas were probably, in part, a reflection of moisture content, particularly in the permeable, sandy Quaternary strata, at the time of survey. The Inverurie–Stonehaven soundings were taken when the ground was wet, in early spring, whereas the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline soundings were made when the ground was dry, at the end of a notably dry summer. The resistivity values for tills of the East Grampian and Mearns drift groups are very similar in the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline area, and comparable to many of those recorded from tills in the Inverurie–Stonehaven area. The resistivity values from sands and gravels of the Mearns Drift Group are generally lower than those from the East Grampian Drift Group and probably reflect the finer grained and more silty nature of the former deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resistivity contrast between permeable sand and gravel, and less permeable deposits (till, glaciolacustrine silt and clay) was evident in both assessment surveys allowing clear subdivision of the Quaternary sequences, based on their geophysical signature. However, the contrast between Quaternary deposits and bedrock was generally less evident and in places accurate rockhead depth was difficult to determine without nearby borehole control. The resistivity values obtained for the Quaternary sediments in north-east Scotland are generally much higher than those in southern Britain (Auton, 1992). This reflects, in part, the crystalline or sandy nature of the resistant bedrock parent material, incorporated in the Quaternary deposits of the district, and also the high proportion of boulders and cobbles in the sediments. In southern England, in particular, much of the fine-grained material in glacigenic sediments is derived from mudstone bedrock and large clasts are normally less numerous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ground probing radar traverses ==&lt;br /&gt;
The two ground probing radar (GPR) traverses (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), each about 750 m in length, were undertaken in the Houff of Ury area (sited on P915337 a). They provided data on the lateral extent and sedimentary architecture of the Quaternary deposits beyond what could be gleaned from surface mapping, conductivity measurements and the sinking of boreholes and trial pits (Greenwood et al., 1995). Gently inclined reflectors were interpreted as corresponding with large-scale foreset bedding typical of glaciofluvial deltaic deposits within the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the area. These deltas form rounded and flat-topped mounds. Organised, quiet, layered patterns of reflectors, are thought to be typical of flat-lying glaciolacustrine deposits (Ury Silts Formation) infilling shallow ice-scoured rock basins. The glaciolacustrine sediments typically comprise silty, fine-grained sand and sandy silt. Multiple diffractions, typical of pebble and cobble gravel, were seen beneath topographic highs. These correspond to gravelly deltaic topset beds; the gently inclined reflectors indicating foreset bedding are developed on the flanks of the topographic highs. Lower amplitude diffraction patterns, indicating sediments containing scattered boulders and cobbles, were seen to be characteristic of till overlying Dalradian metamorphic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four GPR traverses (P915339 a) were made across the type area of the Buchan Ridge Gravel Member at Moss of Cruden, during 1994, to image the internal geometry of the deposit and the form of its basal contact with the underlying bedrock. A short traverse was also undertaken along a track through a forestry plantation at Moss of Auquharney (NJ 023 397), some 150 m south of the type area. The resulting profiles (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), together with data from trial pits, boreholes, and resistivity soundings provided important evidence bearing on the origin of the gravel (Chapter 4; Appendix 1Site 14).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most informative GPR profile (line 1) is almost coincident with the pitting transect A1–A of Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3), across the northern slope of the ridge at Moss of Cruden. Part of the north-west to south-east profile, (162–364 m) is shown in P915339 b. The series of shallow-dipping, well-ordered reflections (without diffractions) indicates undisturbed Palaeogene to Neogene gravel (Buchan Ridge Gravel Member), with low-angle cross-stratification dipping towards the axis of the ridge. Farther up-slope (276–342 m), the GPR reflectors are distorted by diffractions that may indicate periglacial and glacitectonic disturbance of the upper part of the gravel. The profile shows the cross-stratified gravel unit thinning north-westwards, confirming that its feather edge rests on weathered Lower Cretaceous sandstone and Caledonian granitic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cretaceous Moreseat Sandstone, which is largely decomposed to soft sandy silt and silty sand, is characterised by a diminution in radar reflectivity. This was only clearly imaged toward the north-western end of the profile (Greenwood et al.,1995, fig.5, 80–100 m). The resistivity depth probes and radar indicate that around 25 m of Buchan Ridge Gravel lies beneath the crest of the ridge, infilling a channel running parallel to the line of the ridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretation of resistivity data from Moss of Cruden has allowed modelling of resistivity values for parts of the sequence encountered in the GPR profile 1 (P915340). The topsoil is characterised by high resistivity values (2675–5940 ohm m) and the upper parts of the Buchan Ridge Gravel display a range of lower resistivities (447–2534 ohm m). This is thought to be due, in part, to variations in the proportions of kaolinised granitic clasts throughout the unit, the presence of interbeds of clayey pebbly sand (known from the upper part of the gravel sequence in Borehole NK 04 SW3) and the disturbance of bedding, indicated by distorted diffractions in the GPR profile. A layer, about 10 m thick, displaying relatively uniform low resistivities (307–355 ohm m) occurs below the ‘disturbed’ gravel at sounding sites MOSS and M1-285; it reaches the surface at M1-225. Its uniform resistivity response is taken to indicate that this gravel (with its shallow-dipping, well-ordered GPR reflections) is little disturbed and generally contains more kaolinitic material, in the form of decomposed granite cobbles and as fine-grained matrix, than the overlying ‘disturbed’ material. The absence of the latter in sounding M1-225, suggests that the upper ‘disturbed’ units are only well preserved where the gravel is thickest (towards the crest of the ridge); they have probably been removed on the flanks of the ridge by glacial erosion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of Moreseat Sandstone, infilling a topographic depression in deeply decomposed granite bedrock (between M1-225 and MOSS), is suggested by a 120 ohm m layer at the base of sounding M1-285 and corroborated by the trial pitting results reported by Hall and Jarvis (1994). A value of 120 ohm m is lower than might be expected for sandstone, but is comparable to values of 76–97 ohm m obtained for decomposed Devonian sandy siltstone from the Stonehaven–Auchenblae area (Auton et al., 1990). The very low resistivity (22 ohm m) layer from about 112 to 95 m above OD in sounding M-225, corresponds to grussified granitic bedrock recorded at the bottom of trial pit 15 in Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3). Similar (29.5 ohm m) deeply weathered material, some 23 m thick, overlies fresh granite bedrock (3640 ohm m) in sounding MOSS on the ridge crest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five GPR traverses were also made (in 1994) across the type area of the Windy Hills Gravel Member (Greenwood et al., 1995). The interpreted GPR data are incorporated in the description of the Windy Hills site given in Appendix 1 (see also Chapter 4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21720</id>
		<title>Results of shallow geophysical surveys, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Results_of_shallow_geophysical_surveys,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21720"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:39:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Results of shallow geophysical surveys */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Results of shallow geophysical surveys =&lt;br /&gt;
During surveys of the Cainozoic deposits in north-east Scotland various shallow geophysical techniques have been used to provide data on the nature, thickness and lateral extent of concealed sedimentary units ([[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)#Two Applied geology|Applied geology]]). Interpretation of electrical conductivity and resistivity measurements, in particular, has also provided insights into the lateral heterogeneity typical of the surface deposits of the district.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conductivity survey ==&lt;br /&gt;
The methods employed and the results from a conductivity survey in the vicinity of the Houff of Ury (NO 856 889), near Stonehaven, and the resistivity soundings from the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel assessment area (MAR 148 on P915334), are fully described in Auton et al. (1988) and Auton (1992). Both techniques provided insights into the three dimensional distribution of workable deposits of sand and gravel, augmenting the surface mapping information. For example, interpretation of a contoured plot of ground conductivity values in the Houff of Ury area (P915337 a), in conjunction with detailed geological mapping, resulted in a 60 per cent reduction in the estimated extent of sand and gravel, compared with that recorded during the primary geological survey of the area in 1884. It also led to the recognition of minor, but notable amounts of workable sand and gravel (P915337 b) concealed beneath thin till overburden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistivity surveys ==&lt;br /&gt;
Forty three resistivity depth soundings were taken at 25 sites during the Inverurie–Stonehaven sand and gravel resource survey. The soundings, together with data obtained from 173 sample points (trial pits, exposures and boreholes) were used to characterise the Quaternary sequences in the area. Eight of the resistivity sites were positioned close to sample points to allow calibration of resistivity values. The calibrated results enhanced extrapolation of the nature and thickness of deposits between sample points, particularly in the major river valleys, where the full thickness of water saturated material was commonly not proved by pitting and shallow drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soundings also provided data on the typical range of resistivities for each type of Quaternary deposit encountered (P915338). For example, resistivity values for ‘clayey’ materials, such as till and hummocky glacial deposits, were low, ranging from about 18 to 300 ohm m, whereas values for sand and gravel were high, ranging from 400 to 10 000 ohm m. The range of resistivity values obtained from 44 soundings taken in the adjacent Strachan-Auchenblae–Catterline assessment area (Auton et al., 1990) was somewhat larger. Values of 175 to 700 ohm m were obtained for tills, and 10 000 to 17 000 ohm m for sands and gravels of the East Grampian Drift Group in the Strachan area; values of 150 to 900 ohm m (till) and 300 to 6000 ohm m (sand and gravel) were recorded for deposits of the Mearns Drift Group, between Auchenblae and Catterline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Differences between the ranges of values obtained from the two assessment areas were probably, in part, a reflection of moisture content, particularly in the permeable, sandy Quaternary strata, at the time of survey. The Inverurie–Stonehaven soundings were taken when the ground was wet, in early spring, whereas the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline soundings were made when the ground was dry, at the end of a notably dry summer. The resistivity values for tills of the East Grampian and Mearns drift groups are very similar in the Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline area, and comparable to many of those recorded from tills in the Inverurie–Stonehaven area. The resistivity values from sands and gravels of the Mearns Drift Group are generally lower than those from the East Grampian Drift Group and probably reflect the finer grained and more silty nature of the former deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resistivity contrast between permeable sand and gravel, and less permeable deposits (till, glaciolacustrine silt and clay) was evident in both assessment surveys allowing clear subdivision of the Quaternary sequences, based on their geophysical signature. However, the contrast between Quaternary deposits and bedrock was generally less evident and in places accurate rockhead depth was difficult to determine without nearby borehole control. The resistivity values obtained for the Quaternary sediments in north-east Scotland are generally much higher than those in southern Britain (Auton, 1992). This reflects, in part, the crystalline or sandy nature of the resistant bedrock parent material, incorporated in the Quaternary deposits of the district, and also the high proportion of boulders and cobbles in the sediments. In southern England, in particular, much of the fine-grained material in glacigenic sediments is derived from mudstone bedrock and large clasts are normally less numerous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ground probing radar traverses ==&lt;br /&gt;
The two ground probing radar (GPR) traverses (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), each about 750 m in length, were undertaken in the Houff of Ury area (sited on P915337 a). They provided data on the lateral extent and sedimentary architecture of the Quaternary deposits beyond what could be gleaned from surface mapping, conductivity measurements and the sinking of boreholes and trial pits (Greenwood et al., 1995). Gently inclined reflectors were interpreted as corresponding with large-scale foreset bedding typical of glaciofluvial deltaic deposits within the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the area. These deltas form rounded and flat-topped mounds. Organised, quiet, layered patterns of reflectors, are thought to be typical of flat-lying glaciolacustrine deposits (Ury Silts Formation) infilling shallow ice-scoured rock basins. The glaciolacustrine sediments typically comprise silty, fine-grained sand and sandy silt. Multiple diffractions, typical of pebble and cobble gravel, were seen beneath topographic highs. These correspond to gravelly deltaic topset beds; the gently inclined reflectors indicating foreset bedding are developed on the flanks of the topographic highs. Lower amplitude diffraction patterns, indicating sediments containing scattered boulders and cobbles, were seen to be characteristic of till overlying Dalradian metamorphic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four GPR traverses (P915339 a) were made across the type area of the Buchan Ridge Gravel Member at Moss of Cruden, during 1994, to image the internal geometry of the deposit and the form of its basal contact with the underlying bedrock. A short traverse was also undertaken along a track through a forestry plantation at Moss of Auquharney (NJ 023 397), some 150 m south of the type area. The resulting profiles (Greenwood and Raines, 1994), together with data from trial pits, boreholes, and resistivity soundings provided important evidence bearing on the origin of the gravel (Chapter 4; Appendix 1Site 14).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most informative GPR profile (line 1) is almost coincident with the pitting transect A1–A of Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3), across the northern slope of the ridge at Moss of Cruden. Part of the north-west to south-east profile, (162–364 m) is shown in P915339 b. The series of shallow-dipping, well-ordered reflections (without diffractions) indicates undisturbed Palaeogene to Neogene gravel (Buchan Ridge Gravel Member), with low-angle cross-stratification dipping towards the axis of the ridge. Farther up-slope (276–342 m), the GPR reflectors are distorted by diffractions that may indicate periglacial and glacitectonic disturbance of the upper part of the gravel. The profile shows the cross-stratified gravel unit thinning north-westwards, confirming that its feather edge rests on weathered Lower Cretaceous sandstone and Caledonian granitic bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cretaceous Moreseat Sandstone, which is largely decomposed to soft sandy silt and silty sand, is characterised by a diminution in radar reflectivity. This was only clearly imaged toward the north-western end of the profile (Greenwood et al.,1995, fig.5, 80–100 m). The resistivity depth probes and radar indicate that around 25 m of Buchan Ridge Gravel lies beneath the crest of the ridge, infilling a channel running parallel to the line of the ridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interpretation of resistivity data from Moss of Cruden has allowed modelling of resistivity values for parts of the sequence encountered in the GPR profile 1 (P915340). The topsoil is characterised by high resistivity values (2675–5940 ohm m) and the upper parts of the Buchan Ridge Gravel display a range of lower resistivities (447–2534 ohm m). This is thought to be due, in part, to variations in the proportions of kaolinised granitic clasts throughout the unit, the presence of interbeds of clayey pebbly sand (known from the upper part of the gravel sequence in Borehole NK 04 SW3) and the disturbance of bedding, indicated by distorted diffractions in the GPR profile. A layer, about 10 m thick, displaying relatively uniform low resistivities (307–355 ohm m) occurs below the ‘disturbed’ gravel at sounding sites MOSS and M1-285; it reaches the surface at M1-225. Its uniform resistivity response is taken to indicate that this gravel (with its shallow-dipping, well-ordered GPR reflections) is little disturbed and generally contains more kaolinitic material, in the form of decomposed granite cobbles and as fine-grained matrix, than the overlying ‘disturbed’ material. The absence of the latter in sounding M1-225, suggests that the upper ‘disturbed’ units are only well preserved where the gravel is thickest (towards the crest of the ridge); they have probably been removed on the flanks of the ridge by glacial erosion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of Moreseat Sandstone, infilling a topographic depression in deeply decomposed granite bedrock (between M1-225 and MOSS), is suggested by a 120 ohm m layer at the base of sounding M1-285 and corroborated by the trial pitting results reported by Hall and Jarvis (1994). A value of 120 ohm m is lower than might be expected for sandstone, but is comparable to values of 76–97 ohm m obtained for decomposed Devonian sandy siltstone from the Stonehaven–Auchenblae area (Auton et al., 1990). The very low resistivity (22 ohm m) layer from about 112 to 95 m above OD in sounding M-225, corresponds to grussified granitic bedrock recorded at the bottom of trial pit 15 in Hall and Jarvis (1994, fig.3). Similar (29.5 ohm m) deeply weathered material, some 23 m thick, overlies fresh granite bedrock (3640 ohm m) in sounding MOSS on the ridge crest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five GPR traverses were also made (in 1994) across the type area of the Windy Hills Gravel Member (Greenwood et al., 1995). The interpreted GPR data are incorporated in the description of the Windy Hills site given in Appendix 1 (see also Chapter 4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_67_Stonehaven,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21719</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 67 Stonehaven, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_67_Stonehaven,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21719"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:32:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 67 Stonehaven =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915381.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 67 Stonehaven. P915381.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Limited spreads of sand and gravel occur on Sheet 67 [[Media:P915381.png|(P915381)]], but their proximity to good road links with the expanding Aberdeen market, has led to exploitation of much of the more attractive material. Most of the resources from Stonehaven northwards, including those in the lower reaches of the valleys of the Cowie Water and Carron Water, were evaluated as part of Mineral Assessment Report 148; most of those in the south were included in MAR 149. The deposits in the Dee valley, were included in MAR 146. The sands and gravels that crop out around Inverbervie have not been assessed in detail, but they are described in Carroll (1995b).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from discontinuous terraced spreads in the valleys of the Cowie Water and the River Dee, most of the workable glaciofluvial deposits occur as isolated groups of mounds and ridges on the interfluves. Many of the Lower Devonian conglomerates which crop out to the south of Stonehaven are disaggregated to at least 5 m depth and form resources of cobble and boulder gravel. In places, the exposed conglomerates have been worked for use as fill, but extensive resources remain at the surface and beneath a thin overburden of till, which itself is very gravelly. Only minor discontinuous resources of coarse aggregate are present within the moundy glacial deposits in the northern half of the sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the thickest deposits of the sand and gravel in the valley of the Cowie Water are sterilised by urban development or are worked out. However, significant resources lying above the water table, do occur within fragmentary glaciofluvial terraces upstream of Ury House (NO 859 877) and in the moundy glaciofluvial deposits near Bogheadly (NO 812 888). Thick, but laterally impersistent, resources of gravel and sand are also present as isolated mounds and flat-topped spreads on both sides of the boundary between the Mearns and East Grampian drift groups, to the north of Stonehaven. Within the Mearns Drift Group, upward-coarsening sequences of sand and fine-grained gravel, up to 12.4 m thick, have been recorded in boreholes on the flanks of the Burn of Ury. Similar deposits have been worked to depths of up to 8 m in a pit near Cantlayhills (NO 881 905). Boulder gravel forming a glaciofluvial fan at the eastern end of a glacial drainage channel has also been worked in a pit near Logie (NO 886 888), its proximity to the A92 trunk road more than compensating for the large numbers of oversize clasts within the deposit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel on the sides of the valley of the Carron Water contain less coarse aggregate than similar spreads in the valley of the Cowie Water. The former average 7.9 m in thickness and again typically form coarsening-upward sequences, separated by waste partings of reddish brown silt and clay. The deposits generally grade as fine sand and pebbly sand. Some of the larger spreads have been built on and a few of the remainder have been worked, notably at Braehead (NO 873 852) and north of Kirkton of Fetteresso (NO 853 857).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive spread of glaciofluvial sand and gravel in the southern part of Sheet 67 forms undulating topography between Denhead (NO 865 795) and Temple (NO 852 765). The sand and gravel, up to 12.8 m thick, typically coarsens upwards and ranges in grade from sand to sandy gravel. Around Temple, at the southern end of the mapped spread, much of the workable sand and gravel appears to be formed of glacially transported conglomeratic material rather than outwash. The change from one type of deposit to the other is difficult to map with certainty. Other sand and gravel deposits of note occur near Dunnottar Mains Criggie (NO 875 838), Lindsayfield (NO 820 844), Briggs of Criggie (NO 843 824), Catterline (NO 879 782), Nether Craighill (NO 807 774), Largie (NO 835 760) and Pitcarry (NO 831 741); significant resources have been sterilised within the Inverbervie built up area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915336.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits south of Aberdeen. P915336.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Clasts of granitic and psammitic rocks predominate within the terraced and moundy deposits in the valleys of the Dee and the Cowie Water [[Media:P915336.png|(P915336)]]. Almost all of the other gravels on Sheet 67 belong to the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation and are of similar composition to the bulk of those in the southern part of Sheet 66E. However, they do contain a significantly larger proportion of nondurable clasts, mainly of mudstone, decomposed sandstone, and andesitic volcanic rocks. In general, the workable deposits within the valleys of the Cowie Water and Dee appear to be suitable for most end uses. The potentially workable deposits within the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation are more variable. For example, the deposits on the flanks of the Burn of Ury and at Cantlayhills appear attractive sources of coarse and fine aggregate, whereas the boulder gravel near Logie is mainly suitable for coarse aggregate for asphalt and concrete. The deposits on the flanks of the Carron Water, are primarily attractive sources of fine sand for asphalt, plastering and mortar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_66E_Banchory,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21718</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 66E Banchory, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_66E_Banchory,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21718"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:29:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 66E Banchory =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915380.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of the northern part of Sheet 66E [[Media:P915380.png|(P915380)]] occur within glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits in the valleys of the River Dee, Burn of Sheeoch and Burn of Canny. Extensive spreads of sand and gravel are also present in the valley of the Water of Feugh, in the vicinity of Strachan. Minor resources occur within terraced alluvial deposits and moundy glaciofluvial deposits in Glen Dye and as flat-lying spreads of sand, in a small lake basin near Lochhead of Leys (NO 695 979) and in a larger basin around Loch of Park (NJ 770 990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some potentially workable coarse aggregate, mixed with bouldery diamicton, is present within the moundy glacial deposits forming moraines to the north and east of Loch of Park. Similar morainic sediments also occur in the valleys of the Water of Aven, the Burn of Melmannoch, the Burn of Knock, and on the southern side of the valley of the Water of Feugh, in the vicinity of Powlair (NO 620 912). All are potential sources of low-grade aggregate. Discrete areas of deeply decomposed granitic bedrock, around Loch of Park, Powlair and the upper reaches of Garrol Burn also constitute sources of aggregate suitable for use as fill and road base.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of Sheet 66E, the main spreads of sand and gravel form moundy topography on the northern margin of Strathmore, notably between Auchenblae and Drumlithie, and around Fettercairn. Less attractive deposits are present beneath the floodplains of the Bervie Water, Luther Water, Black Burn, Devilly Burn and Burn of Cauldcots, as well as in the discontinuous terraced spreads on the sides of the valleys. Deeply weathered exposures of Lower Devonian conglomerate north of the Glen of Drumtochty, constitute a resource of cobbly gravel which, in places, exceeds 3 m in thickness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel resources in the Dee valley, downstream of Banchory and within the valley of the Burn of Sheeoch, were evaluated as part of Mineral Assessment Report 148. Those in the vicinity of Strachan and in Strathmore were included in MAR 149. The sands and gravels that crop out in the south-west corner of Sheet 66E have not been assessed in detail. They are described in Carroll (1995d).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The kettled terraces that flank the Dee, between Banchory and the eastern margin of Sheet 66E, contain extensive resources of well stratified gravel and sand, lying above the water table; they average 7.4 m in thickness. Gravelly deposits, beneath negligible overburden are also present underlying the floodplain; they average 10.4 m in thickness. The terraced glaciofluvial gravels have been worked to a depth of greater than 10 m in Park Quarry, near Gallow Hill (NO 806 978), where they merge into mounds and ridges of ice-contact gravel. The upper part of the sequence at Park Quarry is described in Brown (1993); nearby boreholes indicate that the workable material reaches a thickness of between 15.8 and 19.7 m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discontinuous spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel in the valley of the Burn of Sheeoch form flat-topped mounds and sinuous esker ridges trending north-eastwards. The sediments underlying the flat-topped mounds are typified by the coarsening upward deltaic sequence that was formerly exposed in Lochton Pit (NO 752 929). Up to 5.4 m of sandy gravel was recorded overlying laminated glaciolacustrine silt and clay in the floor of the pit; the uppermost parts of the Lochton sequence are described in Brown (1994). The esker deposits are characterised by interdigitating sequences of poorly sorted gravel, fine-grained sand and laminated silt and clay. They are more heterogeneous and hence less attractive sources of aggregate than some of the deltaic deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P220858.jpg|left|thumbnail|Topset gravels overlying sandy deltaic foresets in the Lochton Sand and Gravel Formation, Cammie Wood, Feughside. P220858.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive spreads of sand and gravel in the valley of the Water of Feugh underlie the floodplain and river terraces upstream of Heugh-head (NO 687 928). Much of this material lies close to or below the water table, but mounds and kettled terraces on the southern side of the river valley, upstream of its confluence with the Burn of Knock, contain thick deposits of potentially workable sand and gravel. These deposits are typified by the glaciofluvial deltaic sediments exposed in the working pit at Cammie Wood (NO 695 920), where 12.8 m of sand and gravel occurs above the water table [[Media:P220858.jpg|(P220858)]]. The deposits coarsen upwards, from pebbly sand with partings of silt and clay into cross-bedded, fining-upward graded units of sandy gravel. The sandy gravel is overlain by up to 3 m of subhorizontally bedded coarse gravel that was laid down as the topset beds of the former ice-contact delta. The top of the sequence at Cammie Wood is described further in Brown (1994). Similar upward-coarsening sequences characterise many of the moundy glaciofluvial deposits between Scolly’s Cross (NO 642 877) and Pitdelphin Farm (NO 654 912), and also those forming large kames in the valley of the Devilly Burn, near Clatterin’ Brig (NO 665 782), in the southern part of Sheet 66E.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small but attractive resources of coarse gravel, lying above the water table are present within esker systems in the vicinity of Strachan. Gravels forming the esker ridges, have been worked in pits north of Waulkmill (NO 647 923) and near Templeton (NO 671 916); however, significant unworked resources are present, within discontinuous esker ridges between Powlair and Greendams (NO 649 901).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sands and gravels that form the undulating topography between Auchenblae and Drumlithie, and around Fettercairn, were laid down by meltwaters draining between ice in Strathmore and ice in the upland area to the north, which retreated north-westwards. These deposits characteristically occur as coarsening-upward sequences, which were laid down as deltas and fans into bodies of standing water between the two ice masses. The sands and gravels commonly contain thin waste partings of laminated silt and clay and some workable deposits (notably those south-east of Drumlithie) extend beneath a thin overburden of sandy ‘flow till’. These glaciofluvial sediments are assigned to the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation of the [[Mearns Drift Group, Quaternary lithostratigraphy, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Mearns Drift Group]]. They contain a mixed assemblage of clasts with tough granitic and psammitic pebbles being derived from igneous and metamorphic terrain to the north and less resistant clasts of sandstone and andesitic volcanic rocks derived from the Old Red Sandstone succession in Strathmore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most laterally extensive resources lying above the water table in the vicinity of Auchenblae, occur as flat-topped mounds. These deposits were worked in a large pit at Drumsleed (NO 733 776), where 5 m of sandy gravel was formerly exposed, overlying 13 m of pebbly sand. Exposures in other disused workings indicate that some of the nearby flat-topped deposits are much thinner, and range in composition from clayey gravel, to medium- and coarse-grained sand. Farther to the east, the glaciofluvial deposits become more hummocky and form a series of east-trending ridges that are extensively dissected by glacial drainage channels. The workable deposits of sand and gravel within the ridges range from 1.8 m to over 23.1 m in thickness, and have a similar range of grading characteristics to the deposits forming the flat-topped mounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discontinuous spreads of sand and gravel beneath the floodplains of the Bervie Water, Luther Water, Black Burn, Devilly Burn and Burn of Cauldcots are relatively unattractive sources of aggregate as most lie beneath the water table. However, the last two named burns dissect extensive deposits of sand and gravel of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation that form moundy and terraced spreads around Fettercairn. None of these deposits has been assessed in detail, but notable resources are thought to occur on the lower flanks of Tor Hill, between Thornhill (NO 630 725) and Fettercairn, around Stankeye (NO 643 745), Kincardine Castle (NO 671 751), and at Nether Thainston (NO 634 750).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sands and gravels lying above the water table are present within ice-contact glaciofluvial sequences in two areas at the eastern edge of Sheet 66E. Significant resources of gravel and coarse-grained sand have been worked in several small pits in the valley of the Cowie Water, around Snob Cott (NO 801 885). They also extend downstream on to the adjoining Sheet 67 Stonehaven. The surrounding moundy glacial deposits have also been worked on a small scale, though the resource is commonly thin, bouldery and laterally discontinuous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mounds and ridges of ice-contact sand and gravel on the eastern side of the valley drained by the Carron Water, and the Forthie Water between Brenzieshill (NO 799 792) and Pitdrichie (NO 795 825), have been worked for gravel in several places. The deposits forming the Bridge of Fiddes Esker are largely worked out, whereas up to 18.7 m of gravel was recorded in 1989 from active workings in an esker ridge near Pitdrichie. In contrast, the Little Wards Esker, which forms a discontinuous ridge, extending south-south-westwards for a distance of 1.5 km from the vicinity of Bridgend (NO 803 789), had only been exploited in small piecemeal workings at the time of the assessment. Noteworthy resources were also present within the more extensive glaciofluvial spreads, but the deposits are generally thinner and more sandy than those forming the eskers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915336.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits south of Aberdeen. P915336.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels in the northern portion of Sheet 66E are of similar composition to most of those in the southern part of Sheet 76E, to the north. Clasts of granite and felsite (microgranite) predominate [[Media:P915336.png|(P915336)]]. Most are derived from the Mount Battock Granite, which forms the high ground between the catchments of the Dee, Bervie Water, Carron Water and Cowie Water. Psammitic clasts become more numerous within the glaciofluvial and alluvial gravels in the Dee valley, downstream of Banchory and significant numbers of pebbles of basic igneous rocks are present in gravels forming south-east-trending eskers in the vicinity of Strachan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The glaciofluvial deposits of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the southern part of Sheet 66E contain a high proportion of quartzite and andesite pebbles, many of which have been reworked from local Devonian conglomerates. Some granitic clasts are also present, but the gravels contain a much higher proportion of deleterious material than those in the northern part of Sheet 66E. The friable clasts, which are mainly Devonian mudstone and sandstone pebbles, significantly reduce the strength of the aggregate and its suitability for use in concrete and road construction (see aggregate test results below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
End-use suitability data are only available for the sand and gravel resources in the valley of the River Dee downstream of Banchory, the valley of Burn of Sheeoch, and the sandy lacustrine sediments near Lochhead of Leys and Loch of Park. The glaciofluvial deposits, downstream of Banchory appear to be suitable for most end uses and as ‘all in’ concrete aggregate. The resources in the valley of the Burn of Sheeoch are more variable, with the glaciofluvial sheet deposits near Mains of Blairydrine (NO 742 943) being the most attractive as a source of fine aggregate for asphalt, plaster, mortar and concrete. Some of the lacustrine sediments are also suitable for use as asphalt, plaster, mortar and concrete sand, but the deposits are generally rather thin and variable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_66E_Banchory,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21717</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 66E Banchory, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_66E_Banchory,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21717"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:26:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 66E Banchory =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915380.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 66E Banchory. P915380.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of the northern part of Sheet 66E [[Media:P915380.png|(P915380)]] occur within glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits in the valleys of the River Dee, Burn of Sheeoch and Burn of Canny. Extensive spreads of sand and gravel are also present in the valley of the Water of Feugh, in the vicinity of Strachan. Minor resources occur within terraced alluvial deposits and moundy glaciofluvial deposits in Glen Dye and as flat-lying spreads of sand, in a small lake basin near Lochhead of Leys (NO 695 979) and in a larger basin around Loch of Park (NJ 770 990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some potentially workable coarse aggregate, mixed with bouldery diamicton, is present within the moundy glacial deposits forming moraines to the north and east of Loch of Park. Similar morainic sediments also occur in the valleys of the Water of Aven, the Burn of Melmannoch, the Burn of Knock, and on the southern side of the valley of the Water of Feugh, in the vicinity of Powlair (NO 620 912). All are potential sources of low-grade aggregate. Discrete areas of deeply decomposed granitic bedrock, around Loch of Park, Powlair and the upper reaches of Garrol Burn also constitute sources of aggregate suitable for use as fill and road base.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of Sheet 66E, the main spreads of sand and gravel form moundy topography on the northern margin of Strathmore, notably between Auchenblae and Drumlithie, and around Fettercairn. Less attractive deposits are present beneath the floodplains of the Bervie Water, Luther Water, Black Burn, Devilly Burn and Burn of Cauldcots, as well as in the discontinuous terraced spreads on the sides of the valleys. Deeply weathered exposures of Lower Devonian conglomerate north of the Glen of Drumtochty, constitute a resource of cobbly gravel which, in places, exceeds 3 m in thickness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel resources in the Dee valley, downstream of Banchory and within the valley of the Burn of Sheeoch, were evaluated as part of Mineral Assessment Report 148. Those in the vicinity of Strachan and in Strathmore were included in MAR 149. The sands and gravels that crop out in the south-west corner of Sheet 66E have not been assessed in detail. They are described in Carroll (1995d).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The kettled terraces that flank the Dee, between Banchory and the eastern margin of Sheet 66E, contain extensive resources of well stratified gravel and sand, lying above the water table; they average 7.4 m in thickness. Gravelly deposits, beneath negligible overburden are also present underlying the floodplain; they average 10.4 m in thickness. The terraced glaciofluvial gravels have been worked to a depth of greater than 10 m in Park Quarry, near Gallow Hill (NO 806 978), where they merge into mounds and ridges of ice-contact gravel. The upper part of the sequence at Park Quarry is described in Brown (1993); nearby boreholes indicate that the workable material reaches a thickness of between 15.8 and 19.7 m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discontinuous spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel in the valley of the Burn of Sheeoch form flat-topped mounds and sinuous esker ridges trending north-eastwards. The sediments underlying the flat-topped mounds are typified by the coarsening upward deltaic sequence that was formerly exposed in Lochton Pit (NO 752 929). Up to 5.4 m of sandy gravel was recorded overlying laminated glaciolacustrine silt and clay in the floor of the pit; the uppermost parts of the Lochton sequence are described in Brown (1994). The esker deposits are characterised by interdigitating sequences of poorly sorted gravel, fine-grained sand and laminated silt and clay. They are more heterogeneous and hence less attractive sources of aggregate than some of the deltaic deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P220858.jpg|left|thumbnail|Topset gravels overlying sandy deltaic foresets in the Lochton Sand and Gravel Formation, Cammie Wood, Feughside. P220858.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive spreads of sand and gravel in the valley of the Water of Feugh underlie the floodplain and river terraces upstream of Heugh-head (NO 687 928). Much of this material lies close to or below the water table, but mounds and kettled terraces on the southern side of the river valley, upstream of its confluence with the Burn of Knock, contain thick deposits of potentially workable sand and gravel. These deposits are typified by the glaciofluvial deltaic sediments exposed in the working pit at Cammie Wood (NO 695 920), where 12.8 m of sand and gravel occurs above the water table [[Media:P220858.jpg|(P220858)]]. The deposits coarsen upwards, from pebbly sand with partings of silt and clay into cross-bedded, fining-upward graded units of sandy gravel. The sandy gravel is overlain by up to 3 m of subhorizontally bedded coarse gravel that was laid down as the topset beds of the former ice-contact delta. The top of the sequence at Cammie Wood is described further in Brown (1994). Similar upward-coarsening sequences characterise many of the moundy glaciofluvial deposits between Scolly’s Cross (NO 642 877) and Pitdelphin Farm (NO 654 912), and also those forming large kames in the valley of the Devilly Burn, near Clatterin’ Brig (NO 665 782), in the southern part of Sheet 66E.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small but attractive resources of coarse gravel, lying above the water table are present within esker systems in the vicinity of Strachan. Gravels forming the esker ridges, have been worked in pits north of Waulkmill (NO 647 923) and near Templeton (NO 671 916); however, significant unworked resources are present, within discontinuous esker ridges between Powlair and Greendams (NO 649 901).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sands and gravels that form the undulating topography between Auchenblae and Drumlithie, and around Fettercairn, were laid down by meltwaters draining between ice in Strathmore and ice in the upland area to the north, which retreated north-westwards. These deposits characteristically occur as coarsening-upward sequences, which were laid down as deltas and fans into bodies of standing water between the two ice masses. The sands and gravels commonly contain thin waste partings of laminated silt and clay and some workable deposits (notably those south-east of Drumlithie) extend beneath a thin overburden of sandy ‘flow till’. These glaciofluvial sediments are assigned to the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation of the Mearns Drift Group (see Chapter 8). They contain a mixed assemblage of clasts with tough granitic and psammitic pebbles being derived from igneous and metamorphic terrain to the north and less resistant clasts of sandstone and andesitic volcanic rocks derived from the Old Red Sandstone succession in Strathmore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most laterally extensive resources lying above the water table in the vicinity of Auchenblae, occur as flat-topped mounds. These deposits were worked in a large pit at Drumsleed (NO 733 776), where 5 m of sandy gravel was formerly exposed, overlying 13 m of pebbly sand. Exposures in other disused workings indicate that some of the nearby flat-topped deposits are much thinner, and range in composition from clayey gravel, to medium- and coarse-grained sand. Farther to the east, the glaciofluvial deposits become more hummocky and form a series of east-trending ridges that are extensively dissected by glacial drainage channels. The workable deposits of sand and gravel within the ridges range from 1.8 m to over 23.1 m in thickness, and have a similar range of grading characteristics to the deposits forming the flat-topped mounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discontinuous spreads of sand and gravel beneath the floodplains of the Bervie Water, Luther Water, Black Burn, Devilly Burn and Burn of Cauldcots are relatively unattractive sources of aggregate as most lie beneath the water table. However, the last two named burns dissect extensive deposits of sand and gravel of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation that form moundy and terraced spreads around Fettercairn. None of these deposits has been assessed in detail, but notable resources are thought to occur on the lower flanks of Tor Hill, between Thornhill (NO 630 725) and Fettercairn, around Stankeye (NO 643 745), Kincardine Castle (NO 671 751), and at Nether Thainston (NO 634 750).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sands and gravels lying above the water table are present within ice-contact glaciofluvial sequences in two areas at the eastern edge of Sheet 66E. Significant resources of gravel and coarse-grained sand have been worked in several small pits in the valley of the Cowie Water, around Snob Cott (NO 801 885). They also extend downstream on to the adjoining Sheet 67 Stonehaven. The surrounding moundy glacial deposits have also been worked on a small scale, though the resource is commonly thin, bouldery and laterally discontinuous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mounds and ridges of ice-contact sand and gravel on the eastern side of the valley drained by the Carron Water, and the Forthie Water between Brenzieshill (NO 799 792) and Pitdrichie (NO 795 825), have been worked for gravel in several places. The deposits forming the Bridge of Fiddes Esker are largely worked out, whereas up to 18.7 m of gravel was recorded in 1989 from active workings in an esker ridge near Pitdrichie. In contrast, the Little Wards Esker, which forms a discontinuous ridge, extending south-south-westwards for a distance of 1.5 km from the vicinity of Bridgend (NO 803 789), had only been exploited in small piecemeal workings at the time of the assessment. Noteworthy resources were also present within the more extensive glaciofluvial spreads, but the deposits are generally thinner and more sandy than those forming the eskers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915336.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits south of Aberdeen. P915336.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels in the northern portion of Sheet 66E are of similar composition to most of those in the southern part of Sheet 76E, to the north. Clasts of granite and felsite (microgranite) predominate [[Media:P915336.png|(P915336)]]. Most are derived from the Mount Battock Granite, which forms the high ground between the catchments of the Dee, Bervie Water, Carron Water and Cowie Water. Psammitic clasts become more numerous within the glaciofluvial and alluvial gravels in the Dee valley, downstream of Banchory and significant numbers of pebbles of basic igneous rocks are present in gravels forming south-east-trending eskers in the vicinity of Strachan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The glaciofluvial deposits of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in the southern part of Sheet 66E contain a high proportion of quartzite and andesite pebbles, many of which have been reworked from local Devonian conglomerates. Some granitic clasts are also present, but the gravels contain a much higher proportion of deleterious material than those in the northern part of Sheet 66E. The friable clasts, which are mainly Devonian mudstone and sandstone pebbles, significantly reduce the strength of the aggregate and its suitability for use in concrete and road construction (see aggregate test results below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
End-use suitability data are only available for the sand and gravel resources in the valley of the River Dee downstream of Banchory, the valley of Burn of Sheeoch, and the sandy lacustrine sediments near Lochhead of Leys and Loch of Park. The glaciofluvial deposits, downstream of Banchory appear to be suitable for most end uses and as ‘all in’ concrete aggregate. The resources in the valley of the Burn of Sheeoch are more variable, with the glaciofluvial sheet deposits near Mains of Blairydrine (NO 742 943) being the most attractive as a source of fine aggregate for asphalt, plaster, mortar and concrete. Some of the lacustrine sediments are also suitable for use as asphalt, plaster, mortar and concrete sand, but the deposits are generally rather thin and variable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_86E_Turriff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21716</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 86E Turriff, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_86E_Turriff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21716"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:21:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Sheet 86E Turriff */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 86E Turriff =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915375.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of sand and gravel on this sheet [[Media:P915375.png|(P915375)]] underlie high-level (glaciofluvial) and lower lying (alluvial) terraces within the valleys of the River Deveron and its main tributaries, the Idoch Water and the Burn of Fishrie. Similar, but less extensive deposits flank the ‘misfit’ valley (Towie Spillway) between Turriff and Fyvie. Significant resources of quartz-rich gravel are also present within outliers of the Neogene Windy Hills Gravels Member of the Buchan Gravels Formation at Windy Hills ([[Media:P104101.jpg|P104101]], [[Media:P104102.jpg|P104102]]), north-east of Fyvie; other smaller outliers occur at Dalgatty Wood and Delgaty near Turriff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104101.jpg|left|thumbnail|Quartz-quartzite gravel of the Windy Hills Gravel Member at its type locality. P104101.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104102.jpg|left|thumbnail|Cryoturbated till with vertically aligned pebbles capping the Windy Hills Gravel Member. P104102.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Minor scattered resources of gravel and sand form eskers and small kames in the Alvah–Rosyburn area, and moundy topography along the valley of the Idoch Water, in the vicinity of Balquhindachy Farm (NJ 763 487). Deeply weathered Devonian conglomerates within the Crovie Sandstone Group constitute a minor resource of clayey bouldery gravel in the Turriff–Fyvie area and flat-lying spreads of waterlogged sand and gravel occur within the alluvium and alluvial terraces of the River Ythan and its headwater tributaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deposits underlying the high-level terraces in the Deveron catchment vary considerably in composition. Till, with pockets of sand and gravel, underlies the terraces in the Deveron valley to the north of Turriff. Most of the glaciofluvial terraces around the town itself are composed of sand, with subordinate amounts of gravel, composed of psammitic, pelitic, and granitic clasts, as well as pebbles of sandstone. Gravels predominate upstream of Turriff and along the course of the Burn of King Edward. Clasts of psammitic metamorphic rocks and sandstone characterise the King Edward deposits; slate, feldspar-porphyry and decomposed basic igneous rock clasts are additional components of the gravels in the upper Deveron valley.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Gravels within the northern part of Towie Spillway are poorly sorted and composed of subrounded clasts of granite, sandstone, and chert, as well as of psammitic and pelitic metamorphic rocks. Towards Fyvie, the gravels are mostly composed of rounded clasts of quartzite and sandstone, which are largely derived from the underlying Devonian conglomerate bedrock. The gravel deposit at Windy Hills was evaluated in MAR 76 (Merritt, 1981) and is described in detail in Site 13 [[Windyhills - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Windyhills]]. More than 95 per cent (by weight) of this cobbly deposit is formed of water-worn clasts of white vein quartz and quartzite [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]]. The deposit at Delgaty contains a notable proportion of brown sandstone pebbles in addition to the predominant quartzose clasts, whereas the Dalgatty Wood deposit contains notable amounts of white sand; neither has been the subject of detailed assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21715</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 87E Peterhead, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21715"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:20:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 87E Peterhead =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915377.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As on Sheet 87W, most of the sand and gravel deposits in the northern part of this sheet [[Media:P915377.png|(P915377)]] were included in the ‘Peterhead’ resource survey; those in the southern portion were evaluated as part of the ‘Ellon’ assessment. The most extensive resources in the northern half of the sheet occur as terraced spreads of glaciofluvial gravel and sand around the confluence of the North and South Ugie Water and along the tributaries of the River Ugie, in the vicinity of Longside. There has been considerable exploitation of the terraced sand and gravel in the valley of the North Ugie Water, but a significant proportion of the resource remains; water-saturated gravel is also present beneath the floodplain. The terraced deposits to the south of Longside are generally more sandy and have not been worked as intensively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessment boreholes sunk in alluvial deposits within the valley of the River Ugie indicated only minor resources of variable thickness and extent. The patchy deposits of sand and gravel that underlie degraded terraces flanking the Burn of Faichfield are probably more attractive resources, as are the glaciofluvial deposits around Blackhills (NK 050 527) and Artlaw (NK 073 501); all have been worked in several places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915297.png|left|thumbnail|Distribution of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group and related features. P915297.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal sand dunes north of Peterhead constitute a significant resource of medium-grained sand, with shell fragments locally abundant. Raised beach gravel is known to underlie the sand at several localities. Smaller spreads of blown sand are present inland of the Bay of Cruden and within the Sands of Forvie. The latter lie within a nature reserve, which precludes their exploitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P219697.jpg|thumbnail|The Kippet Hills Esker looking northwards from Broom Hill, near Collieston. P219697.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of Sheet 87E, the main deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel occur as relatively thin, discontinuous spreads, forming mounds and ridges on both sides of the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampian drift groups [[Media:P915297.png|(P915297)]]. Notable resources within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group occur in the vicinity of Hatton and also between Hillhead (NK 022 340) and Mains of Collieston (NK 032 292). The latter include the Kippet Hills Esker [[Media:P219697.jpg|(P219697)]]), described in Appendix 1 (Site 16 [[Kippet Hills, Slains - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Kippet Hills]]). Discontinuous resources of glaciofluvial sand and gravel and sandy glaciolacustrine deposits occur beneath clayey overburden between Hatton and Cruden Bay; waste partings of laminated silt and clay are commonly present within the sequences. Similar glaciofluvial–glaciolacustrine successions also extend from Lochlundie Moss to beyond the southern margin of Sheet 87E. Glaciofluvial sands and gravels are less widespread within the East Grampian Drift Group, though they have been worked near Moreseat (NK 054 404), North Aldie (NK 072 409) and Redleas (NK 091 428).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Palaeogene–Neogene gravels of the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member crop out along the ‘Buchan Ridge’, between the Moss of Cruden and the Hill of Aldie, and beyond the ridge, at Den of Bodham. Unlike the quartzose gravels at Windy Hills, these deposits are primarily composed of flint cobbles in a matrix of kaolinitic clay and quartz sand (largely formed from highly decomposed clasts of igneous and metamorphic rocks). These gravels are regarded as being too coarse and clayey to be a particularly attractive source of aggregate, but they are a source of ornamental cobbles. These deposits are described further in Site 14 [[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Moss of Cruden]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Granite, decomposed to sand, has been exploited quite widely for making tracks and for use in foundations. It was dug on the Hill of Longhaven for bedding oil and gas pipelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel in the northern part of Sheet 87E are similar in composition to most of those on Sheet 87W and contain material suitable for fine asphalt aggregate, plastering/mortar sand and fine concrete aggregate. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]] and a notable proportion of flint is present in the glaciofluvial gravels south-east of Longside. Much of the granitic material is probably derived from the Peterhead Granite; the flint is probably reworked from the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of the sheet a high proportion of platy clasts of limestone and calcareous siltstone occur within gravels of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group. The deposits were formerly burnt for the local production of lime. The calcareous clasts were probably derived from Mesozoic rocks in the adjacent offshore area. The gravels yield coarse- and fine-grained aggregates that appear to be suitable for most end uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_77_Aberdeen,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21714</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 77 Aberdeen, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_77_Aberdeen,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21714"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:17:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 77 Aberdeen =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915379.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 77 Aberdeen. P915379.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Significant spreads of sand and gravel are present on Sheet 77 [[Media:P915379.png|(P915379)]]. Their proximity to Aberdeen, and the major market for building aggregate in north-east Scotland, has meant that many of the more attractive resources, such as those in the vicinity of Leuchlands (NJ 934 133), have been worked out; others have been sterilised by urban expansion. Mapping, undertaken as part of the Aberdeen sand and gravel assessment (MAR 146) and as part of an on-going programme of continuous revision, indicate that the resources on Sheet 77 are much less extensive than might be inferred from the 1:50 000 drift geological map published in 1980. The principal resources occur in three main areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# An arcuate spread of glaciofluvial sediments that stretches from Newburgh to Bridge of Don.&lt;br /&gt;
# Spreads of sand and gravel that flank the River Don upstream of Dyce and across the interfluve between Dyce and Corby Loch (NO 925 145) to merge with those of 1. above.&lt;br /&gt;
# Scattered spreads within the valleys of tributaries of the River Don and River Dee, beyond the City of Aberdeen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other resources are present within the sand dunes that extend southwards from Sands of Forvie to Bridge of Don. They constitute a potential resource of clean, medium- to fine-grained quartz sand, which, in places, overlies post-glacial raised beach deposits and glaciofluvial sands and gravels. Although the blown sand and underlying deposits have in the past been worked in pits at Blackdog Rifle Ranges (NJ 962 153) and Blackdog Rock (NJ 964 138), much of the remaining resource occurs within environmentally sensitive areas, such as nature reserves, or underlies golf courses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the sand and gravel deposits within the City of Aberdeen have either been worked or sterilised by urban and industrial development. These include the terraced spreads on the northern side of the Dee floodplain downstream of Peterculter, the moundy deposits near Nigg Bay (NJ 967 047), and those between Denmore (NJ 936 111) and Bridge of Don. Much of the urban development in the latter area has taken place since the summary assessment was made in 1988.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel between Newburgh and Denmore forms discontinuous mounds and ridges along the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampians drift groups. The potentially workable deposits are generally thin and sandy, but gravelly units are also present locally. Much of the resource is concealed beneath a variable thickness of overburden, comprising sandy till or a mixture of till and silty glaciolacustrine sediment; waste partings of till and silt are also common. The thickest gravel deposits form a steep-sided discontinuous ridge, 8 to 10 m high, between Hatterseat (NJ 982 215) and Newburgh; they have been worked in several pits near Drums (NJ 986 226). The resources are less extensive than might be inferred from the 1:50 000 drift map, but a BGS borehole at the southern end of the ridge, near Hatterseat, proved 7.1 m of poorly sorted sandy gravel resting on bedrock (Auton and Crofts, 1986). Another BGS borehole, near Pitscaff Croft (NJ 989 235), proved 9.4 m of sandy gravel beneath 4.7 m of overburden. The gravels are composed mainly of clasts of quartzite, psammite and vein quartz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Little remains of the former thick deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel between Corby Loch and the coast, which have been exploited for aggregate in 19 major workings (see Auton and Crofts, 1986, tables 24 and 25). Few of these pits are now active, but currently notable amounts of coarse- and fine-grained aggregate are being extracted at Lochhills (Bishops Loch) pit. The sands and gravels formed a complex pattern of mounds and ridges (see Munro, 1986, fig.36) but the exact distribution of sheet and moundy ice-contact deposits is now difficult to determine, owing to the extent of worked-out and reinstated ground. The workable material ranged from 1.0 to over 13.9 m, averaging about 6 m in thickness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deposits forming the flat-topped mounds generally coarsen upwards, from ripple-laminated fine-grained sand and silt, into well sorted coarse gravel and sand with planar and trough cross-bedding. These workable resources are commonly concealed by thin discontinuous spreads of sandy ‘flow till’. The sand and gravel forming the ridges is generally more poorly sorted and cobbly than that underlying the mounds and discontinuous waste partings of clayey gravel and till are common. Exposures in some of the sequences are illustrated in Aitken (1998).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The terraced spreads of sand and gravel in the valley of the River Don contain significant resources of coarse and fine aggregate, lying above the water table. Similar water-saturated material is present beneath the flood-plain. The terraced deposits were formerly worked in pits at Nether Kirkton (NJ 880 143). Larger workings occur nearby, at Mill of Dyce (St Fergus), within moundy ice-contact sand and gravel that locally exceeds 16.2 m in thickness. These deposits, which are largely worked out, were seen to coarsen upwards, from silty and clayey sand into poorly sorted cobble and boulder gravel; they are described in detail in Site 18 [[Mill of Dyce - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Mill of Dyce]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attractive resources of aggregate lying above the water table are present within the dissected glaciofluvial terraces on the southern side of the valley of the River Dee, downstream of Templar’s Park (NJ 845 999). The deposits average 4.3 m in thickness, but over 10 m of fine-grained silty sand were exposed in abandoned workings 200 m east of Templar’s Park, in 1999; up to 6 m of clast-supported gravel was recorded from working faces in Blairs Quarry (NJ 880 011) during 1988. Major resources of water-saturated gravel (with a mean thickness of 9.4 m) are also present beneath the river flood-plain, overlain by thin clayey alluvium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor resources of moundy sand and gravel, which have been worked in places, are present on the Don–Dee interfluve near Borrowstone (NJ 849 078), Cairdhillock (NJ 848 068), East Brotherfield (NJ 844 043), Foggieton (NJ 867 038) and Easter Auguston (NJ 823 017), near Peterculter. Small deposits of sand and gravel forming mounds and esker ridges, were identified in the valley drained by the Green Burn, in the vicinity of Craibstone College of Agriculture (NJ 866 112), during surveys undertaken as part of the summary assessment study (Merritt et al., 1988). Up to 4 m of poorly sorted cobble gravel was exposed near the crest of the largest esker, and degraded faces in workings at the western end of the ridge indicate that the deposits have been exploited to depths of 12 to 15 m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grading of the most notable deposits of sand and gravel on Sheet 77 is illustrated in Mineral Assessment Report 146 (fig.4). This shows that gravels and sandy gravels predominate in the valleys of the rivers Don and Dee and their main tributaries, and that coarsening-upward successions dominate the more sandy sequences between Balmedie, Bridge of Don and Dyce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915336.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits south of Aberdeen. P915336.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels on Sheet 77 are similar in composition to the bulk of those on the adjoining Sheet 76E Inverurie. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate ([[Media:P915335.png|P915335]], [[Media:P915336.png|P915336]]). Much of the granitic material is derived from the local granite intrusions at Clinterty, Crathes and Aberdeen; the clasts of basic and ultrabasic igneous rocks are probably derived mainly from the intrusion at Belhelvie. Small numbers of limestone and calcareous siltstone pebbles are present in gravels within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group along the coast north of Bridge of Don.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels between Hatterseat and Newburgh and those within the valley of the River Dee, downstream of Peterculter, appear to be particularly suitable for coarse aggregate for road sub-base, asphalt and concrete. The workable deposits around Corby Loch, together with those in the valley of the River Don, between Mill of Dyce Pit and Aryburn (NJ 898 131) are potentially suitable for most end uses. The sandy deposits between Sheilhill (NJ 935 129) and Millden (NJ 971 163) were particularly suitable for use as asphalting sand, but the resource is largely worked out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_77_Aberdeen,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21713</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 77 Aberdeen, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_77_Aberdeen,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21713"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:16:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Sheet 77 Aberdeen */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 77 Aberdeen =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915379.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 77 Aberdeen. P915379.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Significant spreads of sand and gravel are present on Sheet 77 [[Media:P915379.png|(P915379)]]. Their proximity to Aberdeen, and the major market for building aggregate in north-east Scotland, has meant that many of the more attractive resources, such as those in the vicinity of Leuchlands (NJ 934 133), have been worked out; others have been sterilised by urban expansion. Mapping, undertaken as part of the Aberdeen sand and gravel assessment (MAR 146) and as part of an on-going programme of continuous revision, indicate that the resources on Sheet 77 are much less extensive than might be inferred from the 1:50 000 drift geological map published in 1980. The principal resources occur in three main areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# An arcuate spread of glaciofluvial sediments that stretches from Newburgh to Bridge of Don.&lt;br /&gt;
# Spreads of sand and gravel that flank the River Don upstream of Dyce and across the interfluve between Dyce and Corby Loch (NO 925 145) to merge with those of 1. above.&lt;br /&gt;
# Scattered spreads within the valleys of tributaries of the River Don and River Dee, beyond the City of Aberdeen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other resources are present within the sand dunes that extend southwards from Sands of Forvie to Bridge of Don. They constitute a potential resource of clean, medium- to fine-grained quartz sand, which, in places, overlies post-glacial raised beach deposits and glaciofluvial sands and gravels. Although the blown sand and underlying deposits have in the past been worked in pits at Blackdog Rifle Ranges (NJ 962 153) and Blackdog Rock (NJ 964 138), much of the remaining resource occurs within environmentally sensitive areas, such as nature reserves, or underlies golf courses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the sand and gravel deposits within the City of Aberdeen have either been worked or sterilised by urban and industrial development. These include the terraced spreads on the northern side of the Dee floodplain downstream of Peterculter, the moundy deposits near Nigg Bay (NJ 967 047), and those between Denmore (NJ 936 111) and Bridge of Don. Much of the urban development in the latter area has taken place since the summary assessment was made in 1988.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel between Newburgh and Denmore forms discontinuous mounds and ridges along the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampians drift groups. The potentially workable deposits are generally thin and sandy, but gravelly units are also present locally. Much of the resource is concealed beneath a variable thickness of overburden, comprising sandy till or a mixture of till and silty glaciolacustrine sediment; waste partings of till and silt are also common. The thickest gravel deposits form a steep-sided discontinuous ridge, 8 to 10 m high, between Hatterseat (NJ 982 215) and Newburgh; they have been worked in several pits near Drums (NJ 986 226). The resources are less extensive than might be inferred from the 1:50 000 drift map, but a BGS borehole at the southern end of the ridge, near Hatterseat, proved 7.1 m of poorly sorted sandy gravel resting on bedrock (Auton and Crofts, 1986). Another BGS borehole, near Pitscaff Croft (NJ 989 235), proved 9.4 m of sandy gravel beneath 4.7 m of overburden. The gravels are composed mainly of clasts of quartzite, psammite and vein quartz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Little remains of the former thick deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel between Corby Loch and the coast, which have been exploited for aggregate in 19 major workings (see Auton and Crofts, 1986, tables 24 and 25). Few of these pits are now active, but currently notable amounts of coarse- and fine-grained aggregate are being extracted at Lochhills (Bishops Loch) pit. The sands and gravels formed a complex pattern of mounds and ridges (see Munro, 1986, fig.36) but the exact distribution of sheet and moundy ice-contact deposits is now difficult to determine, owing to the extent of worked-out and reinstated ground. The workable material ranged from 1.0 to over 13.9 m, averaging about 6 m in thickness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deposits forming the flat-topped mounds generally coarsen upwards, from ripple-laminated fine-grained sand and silt, into well sorted coarse gravel and sand with planar and trough cross-bedding. These workable resources are commonly concealed by thin discontinuous spreads of sandy ‘flow till’. The sand and gravel forming the ridges is generally more poorly sorted and cobbly than that underlying the mounds and discontinuous waste partings of clayey gravel and till are common. Exposures in some of the sequences are illustrated in Aitken (1998).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The terraced spreads of sand and gravel in the valley of the River Don contain significant resources of coarse and fine aggregate, lying above the water table. Similar water-saturated material is present beneath the flood-plain. The terraced deposits were formerly worked in pits at Nether Kirkton (NJ 880 143). Larger workings occur nearby, at Mill of Dyce (St Fergus), within moundy ice-contact sand and gravel that locally exceeds 16.2 m in thickness. These deposits, which are largely worked out, were seen to coarsen upwards, from silty and clayey sand into poorly sorted cobble and boulder gravel; they are described in detail in Appendix 1 (Site 18 [[Mill of Dyce - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Mill of Dyce]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attractive resources of aggregate lying above the water table are present within the dissected glaciofluvial terraces on the southern side of the valley of the River Dee, downstream of Templar’s Park (NJ 845 999). The deposits average 4.3 m in thickness, but over 10 m of fine-grained silty sand were exposed in abandoned workings 200 m east of Templar’s Park, in 1999; up to 6 m of clast-supported gravel was recorded from working faces in Blairs Quarry (NJ 880 011) during 1988. Major resources of water-saturated gravel (with a mean thickness of 9.4 m) are also present beneath the river flood-plain, overlain by thin clayey alluvium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor resources of moundy sand and gravel, which have been worked in places, are present on the Don–Dee interfluve near Borrowstone (NJ 849 078), Cairdhillock (NJ 848 068), East Brotherfield (NJ 844 043), Foggieton (NJ 867 038) and Easter Auguston (NJ 823 017), near Peterculter. Small deposits of sand and gravel forming mounds and esker ridges, were identified in the valley drained by the Green Burn, in the vicinity of Craibstone College of Agriculture (NJ 866 112), during surveys undertaken as part of the summary assessment study (Merritt et al., 1988). Up to 4 m of poorly sorted cobble gravel was exposed near the crest of the largest esker, and degraded faces in workings at the western end of the ridge indicate that the deposits have been exploited to depths of 12 to 15 m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grading of the most notable deposits of sand and gravel on Sheet 77 is illustrated in Mineral Assessment Report 146 (fig.4). This shows that gravels and sandy gravels predominate in the valleys of the rivers Don and Dee and their main tributaries, and that coarsening-upward successions dominate the more sandy sequences between Balmedie, Bridge of Don and Dyce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915336.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits south of Aberdeen. P915336.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels on Sheet 77 are similar in composition to the bulk of those on the adjoining Sheet 76E Inverurie. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate ([[Media:P915335.png|P915335]], [[Media:P915336.png|P915336]]). Much of the granitic material is derived from the local granite intrusions at Clinterty, Crathes and Aberdeen; the clasts of basic and ultrabasic igneous rocks are probably derived mainly from the intrusion at Belhelvie. Small numbers of limestone and calcareous siltstone pebbles are present in gravels within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group along the coast north of Bridge of Don.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels between Hatterseat and Newburgh and those within the valley of the River Dee, downstream of Peterculter, appear to be particularly suitable for coarse aggregate for road sub-base, asphalt and concrete. The workable deposits around Corby Loch, together with those in the valley of the River Don, between Mill of Dyce Pit and Aryburn (NJ 898 131) are potentially suitable for most end uses. The sandy deposits between Sheilhill (NJ 935 129) and Millden (NJ 971 163) were particularly suitable for use as asphalting sand, but the resource is largely worked out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_77_Aberdeen,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21712</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 77 Aberdeen, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_77_Aberdeen,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21712"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T10:15:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 77 Aberdeen =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915379.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 77 Aberdeen. P915379.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Significant spreads of sand and gravel are present on Sheet 77 [[Media:P915379.png|(P915379)]]. Their proximity to Aberdeen, and the major market for building aggregate in north-east Scotland, has meant that many of the more attractive resources, such as those in the vicinity of Leuchlands (NJ 934 133), have been worked out; others have been sterilised by urban expansion. Mapping, undertaken as part of the Aberdeen sand and gravel assessment (MAR 146) and as part of an on-going programme of continuous revision, indicate that the resources on Sheet 77 are much less extensive than might be inferred from the 1:50 000 drift geological map published in 1980. The principal resources occur in three main areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# An arcuate spread of glaciofluvial sediments that stretches from Newburgh to Bridge of Don.&lt;br /&gt;
# Spreads of sand and gravel that flank the River Don upstream of Dyce and across the interfluve between Dyce and Corby Loch (NO 925 145) to merge with those of (i) above.&lt;br /&gt;
# Scattered spreads within the valleys of tributaries of the River Don and River Dee, beyond the City of Aberdeen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other resources are present within the sand dunes that extend southwards from Sands of Forvie to Bridge of Don. They constitute a potential resource of clean, medium- to fine-grained quartz sand, which, in places, overlies post-glacial raised beach deposits and glaciofluvial sands and gravels. Although the blown sand and underlying deposits have in the past been worked in pits at Blackdog Rifle Ranges (NJ 962 153) and Blackdog Rock (NJ 964 138), much of the remaining resource occurs within environmentally sensitive areas, such as nature reserves, or underlies golf courses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the sand and gravel deposits within the City of Aberdeen have either been worked or sterilised by urban and industrial development. These include the terraced spreads on the northern side of the Dee floodplain downstream of Peterculter, the moundy deposits near Nigg Bay (NJ 967 047), and those between Denmore (NJ 936 111) and Bridge of Don. Much of the urban development in the latter area has taken place since the summary assessment was made in 1988.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel between Newburgh and Denmore forms discontinuous mounds and ridges along the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampians drift groups. The potentially workable deposits are generally thin and sandy, but gravelly units are also present locally. Much of the resource is concealed beneath a variable thickness of overburden, comprising sandy till or a mixture of till and silty glaciolacustrine sediment; waste partings of till and silt are also common. The thickest gravel deposits form a steep-sided discontinuous ridge, 8 to 10 m high, between Hatterseat (NJ 982 215) and Newburgh; they have been worked in several pits near Drums (NJ 986 226). The resources are less extensive than might be inferred from the 1:50 000 drift map, but a BGS borehole at the southern end of the ridge, near Hatterseat, proved 7.1 m of poorly sorted sandy gravel resting on bedrock (Auton and Crofts, 1986). Another BGS borehole, near Pitscaff Croft (NJ 989 235), proved 9.4 m of sandy gravel beneath 4.7 m of overburden. The gravels are composed mainly of clasts of quartzite, psammite and vein quartz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Little remains of the former thick deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel between Corby Loch and the coast, which have been exploited for aggregate in 19 major workings (see Auton and Crofts, 1986, tables 24 and 25). Few of these pits are now active, but currently notable amounts of coarse- and fine-grained aggregate are being extracted at Lochhills (Bishops Loch) pit. The sands and gravels formed a complex pattern of mounds and ridges (see Munro, 1986, fig.36) but the exact distribution of sheet and moundy ice-contact deposits is now difficult to determine, owing to the extent of worked-out and reinstated ground. The workable material ranged from 1.0 to over 13.9 m, averaging about 6 m in thickness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deposits forming the flat-topped mounds generally coarsen upwards, from ripple-laminated fine-grained sand and silt, into well sorted coarse gravel and sand with planar and trough cross-bedding. These workable resources are commonly concealed by thin discontinuous spreads of sandy ‘flow till’. The sand and gravel forming the ridges is generally more poorly sorted and cobbly than that underlying the mounds and discontinuous waste partings of clayey gravel and till are common. Exposures in some of the sequences are illustrated in Aitken (1998).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The terraced spreads of sand and gravel in the valley of the River Don contain significant resources of coarse and fine aggregate, lying above the water table. Similar water-saturated material is present beneath the flood-plain. The terraced deposits were formerly worked in pits at Nether Kirkton (NJ 880 143). Larger workings occur nearby, at Mill of Dyce (St Fergus), within moundy ice-contact sand and gravel that locally exceeds 16.2 m in thickness. These deposits, which are largely worked out, were seen to coarsen upwards, from silty and clayey sand into poorly sorted cobble and boulder gravel; they are described in detail in Appendix 1 (Site 18 [[Mill of Dyce - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Mill of Dyce]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attractive resources of aggregate lying above the water table are present within the dissected glaciofluvial terraces on the southern side of the valley of the River Dee, downstream of Templar’s Park (NJ 845 999). The deposits average 4.3 m in thickness, but over 10 m of fine-grained silty sand were exposed in abandoned workings 200 m east of Templar’s Park, in 1999; up to 6 m of clast-supported gravel was recorded from working faces in Blairs Quarry (NJ 880 011) during 1988. Major resources of water-saturated gravel (with a mean thickness of 9.4 m) are also present beneath the river flood-plain, overlain by thin clayey alluvium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor resources of moundy sand and gravel, which have been worked in places, are present on the Don–Dee interfluve near Borrowstone (NJ 849 078), Cairdhillock (NJ 848 068), East Brotherfield (NJ 844 043), Foggieton (NJ 867 038) and Easter Auguston (NJ 823 017), near Peterculter. Small deposits of sand and gravel forming mounds and esker ridges, were identified in the valley drained by the Green Burn, in the vicinity of Craibstone College of Agriculture (NJ 866 112), during surveys undertaken as part of the summary assessment study (Merritt et al., 1988). Up to 4 m of poorly sorted cobble gravel was exposed near the crest of the largest esker, and degraded faces in workings at the western end of the ridge indicate that the deposits have been exploited to depths of 12 to 15 m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grading of the most notable deposits of sand and gravel on Sheet 77 is illustrated in Mineral Assessment Report 146 (fig.4). This shows that gravels and sandy gravels predominate in the valleys of the rivers Don and Dee and their main tributaries, and that coarsening-upward successions dominate the more sandy sequences between Balmedie, Bridge of Don and Dyce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915336.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits south of Aberdeen. P915336.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels on Sheet 77 are similar in composition to the bulk of those on the adjoining Sheet 76E Inverurie. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate ([[Media:P915335.png|P915335]], [[Media:P915336.png|P915336]]). Much of the granitic material is derived from the local granite intrusions at Clinterty, Crathes and Aberdeen; the clasts of basic and ultrabasic igneous rocks are probably derived mainly from the intrusion at Belhelvie. Small numbers of limestone and calcareous siltstone pebbles are present in gravels within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group along the coast north of Bridge of Don.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gravels between Hatterseat and Newburgh and those within the valley of the River Dee, downstream of Peterculter, appear to be particularly suitable for coarse aggregate for road sub-base, asphalt and concrete. The workable deposits around Corby Loch, together with those in the valley of the River Don, between Mill of Dyce Pit and Aryburn (NJ 898 131) are potentially suitable for most end uses. The sandy deposits between Sheilhill (NJ 935 129) and Millden (NJ 971 163) were particularly suitable for use as asphalting sand, but the resource is largely worked out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_76E_Inverurie,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21708</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 76E Inverurie, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_76E_Inverurie,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21708"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T09:30:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 76E Inverurie =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915378.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 76E Inverurie. P915378.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive spreads of sand and gravel on Sheet 76E [[Media:P915378.png|(P915378)]] occur within the valley of the River Don, between Kintore and Inverurie, and between Kemnay and Monymusk. Scattered moundy and terraced spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel occur also on the sides of tributary valleys such as the Kinnernie Burn (around Dunecht), and the Leuchar and Gormack burns farther south. Minor resources are also present in the valley of the River Urie (upstream of Inverurie), the valley of the Ton Burn and those of its tributaries (around Sauchen) and the Beltie Burn (around Torphins). The principal resources within the valley of the River Don were evaluated in Mineral Assessment Report 146 and those around Inverurie and Dunecht were evaluated as part of MAR 148. Resources within the remainder of the sheet are described briefly in Gould (1997).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most attractive resources between Kintore and Monymusk occur within moundy and terraced spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel on the southern side of the Don floodplain. These merge with sands and gravels laid down at both ends of a major east–west-trending glacial meltwater channel (the Tom’s Forest Channel) which dissects the interfluve between Kintore and Kemnay. Much of the resource lies above the water table. The deposits vary in composition, from well-bedded sand and fine gravel, to clast-supported boulder gravel and silty sand. Well-bedded sand and gravel was formerly worked in a pit at Tavelty (NJ 780 173), north-west of Kintore. Similar deposits forming a kame-terrace, between Kintore and Inverurie, have been worked extensively also, but much of the remaining resource is sterilised by urban development. Moundy glaciofluvial deposits to the north of Kemnay have been worked in pits near Mill Farm (NJ 736 178), but significant resources remain to the south-east of the village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boulder gravels, which are not particularly attractive sources of aggregate, are typical of deposits that form esker ridges, such as the discontinuous Kemb Hills Esker. The latter, which extends for about 5 km to the south-west of Kemnay, generally stands about 6 m above the adjacent gravelly glaciofluvial terrace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A large resource of gravel underlies the floodplain of the River Don, between Kintore and Inverurie, but it lies entirely below the water table. The deposit appears to thin and become more sandy downstream, where it occurs beneath an increasing thickness of alluvial clay and silt. Smaller resources of waterlogged gravel and sandy gravel underlie the Don floodplain between Burnhervie (NJ 732 194) and Port Elphinstone (NJ 777 202), where they abut fragmentary kame-terraces, and are composed of coarse gravel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waterlogged deposits of gravel and sand also continue beneath the Don floodplain between Kemnay and Monymusk. The floodplain is flanked by discontinuous river terraces, mainly composed of fine-grained sand and silt, as well as by terraced gravelly glaciofluvial deposits. The latter merge into glaciofluvial sheet deposits at the western end of a large glacial drainage channel. The sheet deposits were exposed in a pit (NJ 693 173) at Rothens, where they comprised clean, clast-supported gravel with subordinate beds of sand and clay-bound gravel. Thin, flat-lying spreads of water-saturated gravel are also present in the floor of the drainage channel, near Red Moss (NJ 705 179); they abut thicker deposits of poorly sorted, matrix-rich gravel that have been worked north-east of Blairdaff (NJ 696 176). The grading of potentially workable sand and gravel from sample points in the Kintore–Kemnay–Monumusk area is illustrated in Mineral Assessment Report 146 (fig.4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel that flank the valleys of the Kinnernie, Leuchar and Gormack burns, and their tributaries, are generally thinner and less homogeneous than those within the valley of the River Don. Nevertheless, resources of sandy gravel, lying above the water table are widespread in these smaller valleys. They occur as moundy deposits in the valley of the Kinnernie Burn, upstream of Dunecht, as mounds, esker ridges and flat-lying spreads in the valley of the Leuchar Burn, downstream of Garlogie (NJ 783 054), and as mounds, up to 10 m high, near Easter Finnercy (NJ 767 042). Minor resources are also present underlying discontinuous river terraces of the River Urie, upstream of Inverurie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moundy glacial deposits that are widespread in the valleys of the western part of the sheet are generally too poorly sorted and bouldery to be considered attractive sources of aggregate. However, small resources of cobble gravel are present in the esker ridges associated with the moundy glacial deposits in the valley of the Ton Burn, and 5 m of well-bedded sand and gravel was exposed in a small pit (NJ 673 109) within terraced glaciofluvial deposits in the vicinity of Monyroads. Some of the glaciofluvial deposits around Sauchen and those in the valley of the Beltie Burn also contain notable amounts of sand and gravel lying above the water table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discrete areas of deeply decomposed granitic bedrock, notably on the flanks of Bennachie and around Easter Tolmauds (NJ 626 075), constitute sources of aggregate suitable for use as fill and in the construction of untarred roads.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
All of the glaciofluvial deposits on Sheet 76E were laid down by meltwater associated with the decay of ice that moved from west to east across the area and eroded the underlying Dalradian metamorphic and Caledonian igneous bedrock. Consequently, the glaciofluvial gravels are predominantly composed of resistant clasts of metamorphic rock (mainly psammite) and igneous rock (mainly granite). Much of the sand is of granitic composition, being largely derived from local outcrops of deeply weathered granite. The alluvial deposits are of similar character, being largely composed of reworked material from the underlying glacial and glaciofluvial sediments. Numerous clasts of coarse- and fine-grained basic igneous rocks occur in gravels from the Urie catchment [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]]; they are largely derived from the Insch basic igneous intrusion, which crops out in the northern part of the area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aggregates appear to be suitable for most end uses, although there are some local variations. The sands and gravel in the catchments of the Kinnernie, Leuchar and Gormack burns, for example, are more sandy and better sorted than deposits in the valley of the River Don, and thus meet a greater range of end-use criteria (for details see Merritt et al., 1988). Sands for use in asphalting are known to be in relatively short supply in the Aberdeen market area, particularly as suitable resources close to the city are largely worked out. The sandy glaciofluvial terraced deposits around Kintore may provide alternative sources of medium- and fine-grained sand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21707</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 87E Peterhead, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21707"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T09:27:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 87E Peterhead =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915377.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As on Sheet 87W, most of the sand and gravel deposits in the northern part of this sheet [[Media:P915377.png|(P915377)]] were included in the ‘Peterhead’ resource survey; those in the southern portion were evaluated as part of the ‘Ellon’ assessment. The most extensive resources in the northern half of the sheet occur as terraced spreads of glaciofluvial gravel and sand around the confluence of the North and South Ugie Water and along the tributaries of the River Ugie, in the vicinity of Longside. There has been considerable exploitation of the terraced sand and gravel in the valley of the North Ugie Water, but a significant proportion of the resource remains; water-saturated gravel is also present beneath the floodplain. The terraced deposits to the south of Longside are generally more sandy and have not been worked as intensively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessment boreholes sunk in alluvial deposits within the valley of the River Ugie indicated only minor resources of variable thickness and extent. The patchy deposits of sand and gravel that underlie degraded terraces flanking the Burn of Faichfield are probably more attractive resources, as are the glaciofluvial deposits around Blackhills (NK 050 527) and Artlaw (NK 073 501); all have been worked in several places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915297.png|left|thumbnail|Distribution of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group and related features. P915297.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal sand dunes north of Peterhead constitute a significant resource of medium-grained sand, with shell fragments locally abundant. Raised beach gravel is known to underlie the sand at several localities. Smaller spreads of blown sand are present inland of the Bay of Cruden and within the Sands of Forvie. The latter lie within a nature reserve, which precludes their exploitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P219697.jpg|thumbnail|The Kippet Hills Esker looking northwards from Broom Hill, near Collieston. P219697.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of Sheet 87E, the main deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel occur as relatively thin, discontinuous spreads, forming mounds and ridges on both sides of the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampian drift groups [[Media:P915297.png|(P915297)]]. Notable resources within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group occur in the vicinity of Hatton and also between Hillhead (NK 022 340) and Mains of Collieston (NK 032 292). The latter include the Kippet Hills Esker [[Media:P219697.jpg|(P219697)]]), described in Appendix 1 (Site 16 [[Kippet Hills, Slains - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Kippet Hills]]). Discontinuous resources of glaciofluvial sand and gravel and sandy glaciolacustrine deposits occur beneath clayey overburden between Hatton and Cruden Bay; waste partings of laminated silt and clay are commonly present within the sequences. Similar glaciofluvial–glaciolacustrine successions also extend from Lochlundie Moss to beyond the southern margin of Sheet 87E. Glaciofluvial sands and gravels are less widespread within the East Grampian Drift Group, though they have been worked near Moreseat (NK 054 404), North Aldie (NK 072 409) and Redleas (NK 091 428).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Palaeogene–Neogene gravels of the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member crop out along the ‘Buchan Ridge’, between the Moss of Cruden and the Hill of Aldie, and beyond the ridge, at Den of Bodham. Unlike the quartzose gravels at Windy Hills, these deposits are primarily composed of flint cobbles in a matrix of kaolinitic clay and quartz sand (largely formed from highly decomposed clasts of igneous and metamorphic rocks). These gravels are regarded as being too coarse and clayey to be a particularly attractive source of aggregate, but they are a source of ornamental cobbles. These deposits are described further in Chapter 4 and Appendix 1 (Site 14 [[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Moss of Cruden]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Granite, decomposed to sand, has been exploited quite widely for making tracks and for use in foundations. It was dug on the Hill of Longhaven for bedding oil and gas pipelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel in the northern part of Sheet 87E are similar in composition to most of those on Sheet 87W and contain material suitable for fine asphalt aggregate, plastering/mortar sand and fine concrete aggregate. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]] and a notable proportion of flint is present in the glaciofluvial gravels south-east of Longside. Much of the granitic material is probably derived from the Peterhead Granite; the flint is probably reworked from the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of the sheet a high proportion of platy clasts of limestone and calcareous siltstone occur within gravels of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group. The deposits were formerly burnt for the local production of lime. The calcareous clasts were probably derived from Mesozoic rocks in the adjacent offshore area. The gravels yield coarse- and fine-grained aggregates that appear to be suitable for most end uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21706</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 87E Peterhead, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21706"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T09:25:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Sheet 87E Peterhead */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 87E Peterhead =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915377.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As on Sheet 87W, most of the sand and gravel deposits in the northern part of this sheet [[Media:P915377.png|(P915377)]] were included in the ‘Peterhead’ resource survey; those in the southern portion were evaluated as part of the ‘Ellon’ assessment. The most extensive resources in the northern half of the sheet occur as terraced spreads of glaciofluvial gravel and sand around the confluence of the North and South Ugie Water and along the tributaries of the River Ugie, in the vicinity of Longside. There has been considerable exploitation of the terraced sand and gravel in the valley of the North Ugie Water, but a significant proportion of the resource remains; water-saturated gravel is also present beneath the floodplain. The terraced deposits to the south of Longside are generally more sandy and have not been worked as intensively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessment boreholes sunk in alluvial deposits within the valley of the River Ugie indicated only minor resources of variable thickness and extent. The patchy deposits of sand and gravel that underlie degraded terraces flanking the Burn of Faichfield are probably more attractive resources, as are the glaciofluvial deposits around Blackhills (NK 050 527) and Artlaw (NK 073 501); all have been worked in several places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915297.png|left|thumbnail|Distribution of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group and related features. P915297.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal sand dunes north of Peterhead constitute a significant resource of medium-grained sand, with shell fragments locally abundant. Raised beach gravel is known to underlie the sand at several localities. Smaller spreads of blown sand are present inland of the Bay of Cruden and within the Sands of Forvie. The latter lie within a nature reserve, which precludes their exploitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P219697.jpg|thumbnail|The Kippet Hills Esker looking northwards from Broom Hill, near Collieston. P219697.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of Sheet 87E, the main deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel occur as relatively thin, discontinuous spreads, forming mounds and ridges on both sides of the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampian drift groups [[Media:P915297.png|(P915297)]]. Notable resources within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group occur in the vicinity of Hatton and also between Hillhead (NK 022 340) and Mains of Collieston (NK 032 292). The latter include the Kippet Hills Esker [[Media:P219697.jpg|(P219697)]]), described in Appendix 1 (Site 16). Discontinuous resources of glaciofluvial sand and gravel and sandy glaciolacustrine deposits occur beneath clayey overburden between Hatton and Cruden Bay; waste partings of laminated silt and clay are commonly present within the sequences. Similar glaciofluvial–glaciolacustrine successions also extend from Lochlundie Moss to beyond the southern margin of Sheet 87E. Glaciofluvial sands and gravels are less widespread within the East Grampian Drift Group, though they have been worked near Moreseat (NK 054 404), North Aldie (NK 072 409) and Redleas (NK 091 428).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Palaeogene–Neogene gravels of the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member crop out along the ‘Buchan Ridge’, between the Moss of Cruden and the Hill of Aldie, and beyond the ridge, at Den of Bodham. Unlike the quartzose gravels at Windy Hills, these deposits are primarily composed of flint cobbles in a matrix of kaolinitic clay and quartz sand (largely formed from highly decomposed clasts of igneous and metamorphic rocks). These gravels are regarded as being too coarse and clayey to be a particularly attractive source of aggregate, but they are a source of ornamental cobbles. These deposits are described further in Chapter 4 and Appendix 1 (Site 14 [[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Moss of Cruden]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Granite, decomposed to sand, has been exploited quite widely for making tracks and for use in foundations. It was dug on the Hill of Longhaven for bedding oil and gas pipelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel in the northern part of Sheet 87E are similar in composition to most of those on Sheet 87W and contain material suitable for fine asphalt aggregate, plastering/mortar sand and fine concrete aggregate. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]] and a notable proportion of flint is present in the glaciofluvial gravels south-east of Longside. Much of the granitic material is probably derived from the Peterhead Granite; the flint is probably reworked from the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of the sheet a high proportion of platy clasts of limestone and calcareous siltstone occur within gravels of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group. The deposits were formerly burnt for the local production of lime. The calcareous clasts were probably derived from Mesozoic rocks in the adjacent offshore area. The gravels yield coarse- and fine-grained aggregates that appear to be suitable for most end uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21705</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 87E Peterhead, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87E_Peterhead,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21705"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T09:24:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 87E Peterhead =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915377.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 87E Peterhead. P915377.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As on Sheet 87W, most of the sand and gravel deposits in the northern part of this sheet [[Media:P915377.png|(P915377)]] were included in the ‘Peterhead’ resource survey; those in the southern portion were evaluated as part of the ‘Ellon’ assessment. The most extensive resources in the northern half of the sheet occur as terraced spreads of glaciofluvial gravel and sand around the confluence of the North and South Ugie Water and along the tributaries of the River Ugie, in the vicinity of Longside. There has been considerable exploitation of the terraced sand and gravel in the valley of the North Ugie Water, but a significant proportion of the resource remains; water-saturated gravel is also present beneath the floodplain. The terraced deposits to the south of Longside are generally more sandy and have not been worked as intensively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessment boreholes sunk in alluvial deposits within the valley of the River Ugie indicated only minor resources of variable thickness and extent. The patchy deposits of sand and gravel that underlie degraded terraces flanking the Burn of Faichfield are probably more attractive resources, as are the glaciofluvial deposits around Blackhills (NK 050 527) and Artlaw (NK 073 501); all have been worked in several places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P219697.jpg|left|thumbnail|The Kippet Hills Esker looking northwards from Broom Hill, near Collieston. P219697.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The coastal sand dunes north of Peterhead constitute a significant resource of medium-grained sand, with shell fragments locally abundant. Raised beach gravel is known to underlie the sand at several localities. Smaller spreads of blown sand are present inland of the Bay of Cruden and within the Sands of Forvie. The latter lie within a nature reserve, which precludes their exploitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915297.png|thumbnail|Distribution of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group and related features. P915297.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of Sheet 87E, the main deposits of glaciofluvial sand and gravel occur as relatively thin, discontinuous spreads, forming mounds and ridges on both sides of the boundary between the Logie-Buchan and East Grampian drift groups [[Media:P915297.png|(P915297)]]. Notable resources within the Logie-Buchan Drift Group occur in the vicinity of Hatton and also between Hillhead (NK 022 340) and Mains of Collieston (NK 032 292). The latter include the Kippet Hills Esker [[Media:P219697.jpg|(P219697)]]), described in Appendix 1 (Site 16). Discontinuous resources of glaciofluvial sand and gravel and sandy glaciolacustrine deposits occur beneath clayey overburden between Hatton and Cruden Bay; waste partings of laminated silt and clay are commonly present within the sequences. Similar glaciofluvial–glaciolacustrine successions also extend from Lochlundie Moss to beyond the southern margin of Sheet 87E. Glaciofluvial sands and gravels are less widespread within the East Grampian Drift Group, though they have been worked near Moreseat (NK 054 404), North Aldie (NK 072 409) and Redleas (NK 091 428).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Palaeogene–Neogene gravels of the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member crop out along the ‘Buchan Ridge’, between the Moss of Cruden and the Hill of Aldie, and beyond the ridge, at Den of Bodham. Unlike the quartzose gravels at Windy Hills, these deposits are primarily composed of flint cobbles in a matrix of kaolinitic clay and quartz sand (largely formed from highly decomposed clasts of igneous and metamorphic rocks). These gravels are regarded as being too coarse and clayey to be a particularly attractive source of aggregate, but they are a source of ornamental cobbles. These deposits are described further in Chapter 4 and Appendix 1 (Site 14 [[Moss of Cruden - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Moss of Cruden]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Granite, decomposed to sand, has been exploited quite widely for making tracks and for use in foundations. It was dug on the Hill of Longhaven for bedding oil and gas pipelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sand and gravel in the northern part of Sheet 87E are similar in composition to most of those on Sheet 87W and contain material suitable for fine asphalt aggregate, plastering/mortar sand and fine concrete aggregate. Clasts of psammitic and granitic rocks predominate [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]] and a notable proportion of flint is present in the glaciofluvial gravels south-east of Longside. Much of the granitic material is probably derived from the Peterhead Granite; the flint is probably reworked from the Buchan Ridge Gravels Member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the southern part of the sheet a high proportion of platy clasts of limestone and calcareous siltstone occur within gravels of the Logie-Buchan Drift Group. The deposits were formerly burnt for the local production of lime. The calcareous clasts were probably derived from Mesozoic rocks in the adjacent offshore area. The gravels yield coarse- and fine-grained aggregates that appear to be suitable for most end uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87W_Ellon,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21702</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 87W Ellon, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_87W_Ellon,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21702"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:55:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 87W Ellon =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915376.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 87W Ellon. P915376.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the sand and gravel resources in this district [[Media:P915376.png|(P915376)]] form terraced glaciofluvial sheet deposits. Those in the northern portion of the sheet occur within the Ugie Water catchment and were included in the ‘Peterhead’ sand and gravel assessment (MAR 58). Deposits in the southern portion lie within the Ythan catchment and were evaluated as part of the ‘Ellon’ assessment (MAR 76). In the north, sands and gravels underlying discontinuous glaciofluvial terraces flanking the North Ugie Water downstream from Strichen constitute the most important resources; water-saturated gravel is also present beneath the floodplain. Smaller spreads of glaciofluvial sand and gravel flank the floodplain of the South Ugie Water, upstream of Old Deer, which is also built upon a glaciofluvial terrace. Similar terraced deposits extend along the valleys of the southern tributaries of the South Ugie Water, in the vicinity of Fordmouth (NK 012 457) and Stuartfield (NJ 973 457), but much of the latter resource is sterilised by buildings. Most of the readily available resources in this area were exploited during the 1970s and 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|left|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Glaciofluvial terrace deposits also form the most extensive resources in the Ythan catchment. These terraced deposits have been extensively worked downstream of Methlick. Most of the resources consist of coarse gravel (boulders over 1 m in diameter are common) lying above the water table. A less attractive resource of gravel, occurring almost entirely below the water table, underlies the river floodplain; it was formerly dredged at a pit (NJ 922 321) near Ardlethen. Terraced glaciofluvial sand and gravel associated with a former course of the Ythan, between Ellon and its present estuary, also constitute a significant resource of sand and gravel. It has been worked extensively in a pit to the north of Deep Heather (NJ 976 290). An isolated deposit of sand and gravel was worked in a large pit (now filled-in) at Tillybrex (NK 002 348). Moundy deposits in the vicinity of Cross Stone (NJ 954 279) are currently being worked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The composition of gravels on Sheet 87W is illustrated in [[Media:P915335.png|P915335]], which shows that psammitic clasts predominate, although granitic clasts constitute a significant component. Small amounts of deleterious material are generally present and pebbles of basic igneous rocks are numerous within the water-saturated gravels in the vicinity of Ardlethen. Most of the resources in the Ythan valley contain material suitable for a wide variety of end-uses, but those within the catchments of North Ugie Water and South Ugie Waters possibly suit fewer types of end-use. For example, only a limited amount of material matches the end-use criteria for coarse asphalt aggregate. However, fine aggregate potentially suitable for mortaring and concrete is present in some of the more sandy terraced deposits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_86E_Turriff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21701</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 86E Turriff, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_86E_Turriff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21701"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:52:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 86E Turriff =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915375.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of sand and gravel on this sheet [[Media:P915375.png|(P915375)]] underlie high-level (glaciofluvial) and lower lying (alluvial) terraces within the valleys of the River Deveron and its main tributaries, the Idoch Water and the Burn of Fishrie. Similar, but less extensive deposits flank the ‘misfit’ valley (Towie Spillway) between Turriff and Fyvie. Significant resources of quartz-rich gravel are also present within outliers of the Neogene Windy Hills Gravels Member of the Buchan Gravels Formation at Windy Hills ([[Media:P104101.jpg|P104101]], [[Media:P104102.jpg|P104102]]), north-east of Fyvie; other smaller outliers occur at Dalgatty Wood and Delgaty near Turriff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104101.jpg|left|thumbnail|Quartz-quartzite gravel of the Windy Hills Gravel Member at its type locality. P104101.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104102.jpg|left|thumbnail|Cryoturbated till with vertically aligned pebbles capping the Windy Hills Gravel Member. P104102.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Minor scattered resources of gravel and sand form eskers and small kames in the Alvah–Rosyburn area, and moundy topography along the valley of the Idoch Water, in the vicinity of Balquhindachy Farm (NJ 763 487). Deeply weathered Devonian conglomerates within the Crovie Sandstone Group constitute a minor resource of clayey bouldery gravel in the Turriff–Fyvie area and flat-lying spreads of waterlogged sand and gravel occur within the alluvium and alluvial terraces of the River Ythan and its headwater tributaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deposits underlying the high-level terraces in the Deveron catchment vary considerably in composition. Till, with pockets of sand and gravel, underlies the terraces in the Deveron valley to the north of Turriff. Most of the glaciofluvial terraces around the town itself are composed of sand, with subordinate amounts of gravel, composed of psammitic, pelitic, and granitic clasts, as well as pebbles of sandstone. Gravels predominate upstream of Turriff and along the course of the Burn of King Edward. Clasts of psammitic metamorphic rocks and sandstone characterise the King Edward deposits; slate, feldspar-porphyry and decomposed basic igneous rock clasts are additional components of the gravels in the upper Deveron valley.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Gravels within the northern part of Towie Spillway are poorly sorted and composed of subrounded clasts of granite, sandstone, and chert, as well as of psammitic and pelitic metamorphic rocks. Towards Fyvie, the gravels are mostly composed of rounded clasts of quartzite and sandstone, which are largely derived from the underlying Devonian conglomerate bedrock. The gravel deposit at Windy Hills was evaluated in MAR 76 (Merritt, 1981) and is described in detail in Appendix 1 Site 13 [[Windyhills - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Windyhills]]. More than 95 per cent (by weight) of this cobbly deposit is formed of water-worn clasts of white vein quartz and quartzite [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]]. The deposit at Delgaty contains a notable proportion of brown sandstone pebbles in addition to the predominant quartzose clasts, whereas the Dalgatty Wood deposit contains notable amounts of white sand; neither has been the subject of detailed assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_86E_Turriff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21700</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 86E Turriff, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_86E_Turriff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21700"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:49:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 86E Turriff =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915375.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 86E Turriff. P915375.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of sand and gravel on this sheet [[Media:P915375.png|(P915375)]] underlie high-level (glaciofluvial) and lower lying (alluvial) terraces within the valleys of the River Deveron and its main tributaries, the Idoch Water and the Burn of Fishrie. Similar, but less extensive deposits flank the ‘misfit’ valley (Towie Spillway) between Turriff and Fyvie. Significant resources of quartz-rich gravel are also present within outliers of the Neogene Windy Hills Gravels Member of the Buchan Gravels Formation at Windy Hills ([[Media:P104101.jpg|P104101]], [[Media:P104102.jpg|P104102]]), north-east of Fyvie; other smaller outliers occur at Dalgatty Wood and Delgaty near Turriff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104101.jpg|left|thumbnail|Quartz-quartzite gravel of the Windy Hills Gravel Member at its type locality. P104101.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104102.jpg|left|thumbnail|Cryoturbated till with vertically aligned pebbles capping the Windy Hills Gravel Member. P104102.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Minor scattered resources of gravel and sand form eskers and small kames in the Alvah–Rosyburn area, and moundy topography along the valley of the Idoch Water, in the vicinity of Balquhindachy Farm (NJ 763 487). Deeply weathered Devonian conglomerates within the Crovie Sandstone Group constitute a minor resource of clayey bouldery gravel in the Turriff–Fyvie area and flat-lying spreads of waterlogged sand and gravel occur within the alluvium and alluvial terraces of the River Ythan and its headwater tributaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deposits underlying the high-level terraces in the Deveron catchment vary considerably in composition. Till, with pockets of sand and gravel, underlies the terraces in the Deveron valley to the north of Turriff. Most of the glaciofluvial terraces around the town itself are composed of sand, with subordinate amounts of gravel, composed of psammitic, pelitic, and granitic clasts, as well as pebbles of sandstone. Gravels predominate upstream of Turriff and along the course of the Burn of King Edward. Clasts of psammitic metamorphic rocks and sandstone characterise the King Edward deposits; slate, feldspar-porphyry and decomposed basic igneous rock clasts are additional components of the gravels in the upper Deveron valley.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Gravels within the northern part of Towie Spillway are poorly sorted and composed of subrounded clasts of granite, sandstone, and chert, as well as of psammitic and pelitic metamorphic rocks. Towards Fyvie, the gravels are mostly composed of rounded clasts of quartzite and sandstone, which are largely derived from the underlying Devonian conglomerate bedrock. The gravel deposit at Windy Hills was evaluated in MAR 76 (Merritt, 1981) and is described in detail in Appendix 1 Site 13. More than 95 per cent (by weight) of this cobbly deposit is formed of water-worn clasts of white vein quartz and quartzite [[Media:P915335.png|(P915335)]]. The deposit at Delgaty contains a notable proportion of brown sandstone pebbles in addition to the predominant quartzose clasts, whereas the Dalgatty Wood deposit contains notable amounts of white sand; neither has been the subject of detailed assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_97_Fraserburgh,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21699</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 97 Fraserburgh, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_97_Fraserburgh,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21699"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:43:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Sheet 97 Fraserburgh */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== Sheet 97 Fraserburgh ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915374.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 97 Fraserburgh. P915374.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of sand and gravel on Sheet 97 [[Media:P915374.png|(P915374)]] are of four types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Moundy glaciofluvial ice-contact deposits, which occur between New Aberdour and Loch Strathbeg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Terraced glaciofluvial sheet deposits, which occur between Peathill and Rathven, and north-east of Loch of Strathbeg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Concealed deposits of glaciofluvial gravel in the vicinity of Howe of Byth pit (Appendix 1 Site 6 [[Howe of Byth Quarry - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Howe of Byth Quarry]]).&lt;br /&gt;
# Spreads of blown sand, which back the coast between Fraserbrugh and Rattray Head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104110.jpg|left|thumbnail|Climbing ripple-drift cross-lamination in deltaic sands at Kirkmyres pit, near Fraserburgh. P104110.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Peacock (1983) has described these deposits in some detail. The glaciofluvial deposits are assigned to the Blackhills Sand and Gravel Formation. Although predominantly sandy, the kettled, ice-contact deposits are typically very variable in grain size over short distances. Many of the deposits occur as coarsening-upward deltaic sequences (Peacock and Merritt, 2000d). As well as the ubiquitous clasts of hard metamorphic and igneous rocks, some of the more gravelly units contain sparse shells and clasts of soft sedimentary rocks (of Triassic, Jurassic and Early Cretaceous ages). Typical sections occur in pits near Blackhills (at NJ 926 609 and NJ 926 615) [[Media:P104110.jpg|(P104110)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The terraced glaciofluvial deposits are composed predominantly of gravel derived from the local bedrock, but some of the lower lying spreads pass laterally into silt and clay. Considerable amounts of blown sand have accumulated adjacent to Loch Strathbeg. Along the coast, the blown sand is mainly medium grained and composed of quartz with minor amounts of feldspar; shell fragments and small pebbles are present locally.&lt;br /&gt;
Several deeply weathered outcrops of Devonian conglomerate constitute potential sources of coarse gravel in the area to the west of New Aberdour. This material, which is decomposed to a depth of several metres locally, also extends on to the adjoining Banff sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_97_Fraserburgh,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21698</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 97 Fraserburgh, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_97_Fraserburgh,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21698"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:43:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Sheet 97 Fraserburgh */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== Sheet 97 Fraserburgh ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915374.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 97 Fraserburgh. P915374.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of sand and gravel on Sheet 97 [[Media:P915374.png|(P915374)]] are of four types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Moundy glaciofluvial ice-contact deposits, which occur between New Aberdour and Loch Strathbeg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Terraced glaciofluvial sheet deposits, which occur between Peathill and Rathven, and north-east of Loch of Strathbeg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Concealed deposits of glaciofluvial gravel in the vicinity of Howe of Byth pit (Appendix 1 Site 6 [[Howe of Byth Quarry - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Howe of Byth Quarry]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Spreads of blown sand, which back the coast between Fraserbrugh and Rattray Head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104110.jpg|left|thumbnail|Climbing ripple-drift cross-lamination in deltaic sands at Kirkmyres pit, near Fraserburgh. P104110.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Peacock (1983) has described these deposits in some detail. The glaciofluvial deposits are assigned to the Blackhills Sand and Gravel Formation. Although predominantly sandy, the kettled, ice-contact deposits are typically very variable in grain size over short distances. Many of the deposits occur as coarsening-upward deltaic sequences (Peacock and Merritt, 2000d). As well as the ubiquitous clasts of hard metamorphic and igneous rocks, some of the more gravelly units contain sparse shells and clasts of soft sedimentary rocks (of Triassic, Jurassic and Early Cretaceous ages). Typical sections occur in pits near Blackhills (at NJ 926 609 and NJ 926 615) [[Media:P104110.jpg|(P104110)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The terraced glaciofluvial deposits are composed predominantly of gravel derived from the local bedrock, but some of the lower lying spreads pass laterally into silt and clay. Considerable amounts of blown sand have accumulated adjacent to Loch Strathbeg. Along the coast, the blown sand is mainly medium grained and composed of quartz with minor amounts of feldspar; shell fragments and small pebbles are present locally.&lt;br /&gt;
Several deeply weathered outcrops of Devonian conglomerate constitute potential sources of coarse gravel in the area to the west of New Aberdour. This material, which is decomposed to a depth of several metres locally, also extends on to the adjoining Banff sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_97_Fraserburgh,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21697</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 97 Fraserburgh, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_97_Fraserburgh,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21697"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:41:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== Sheet 97 Fraserburgh ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915374.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 97 Fraserburgh. P915374.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The principal resources of sand and gravel on Sheet 97 [[Media:P915374.png|(P915374)]] are of four types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Moundy glaciofluvial ice-contact deposits, which occur between New Aberdour and Loch Strathbeg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Terraced glaciofluvial sheet deposits, which occur between Peathill and Rathven, and north-east of Loch of Strathbeg.&lt;br /&gt;
# Concealed deposits of glaciofluvial gravel in the vicinity of Howe of Byth pit (Appendix 1 Site 6).&lt;br /&gt;
# Spreads of blown sand, which back the coast between Fraserbrugh and Rattray Head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104110.jpg|left|thumbnail|Climbing ripple-drift cross-lamination in deltaic sands at Kirkmyres pit, near Fraserburgh. P104110.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Peacock (1983) has described these deposits in some detail. The glaciofluvial deposits are assigned to the Blackhills Sand and Gravel Formation. Although predominantly sandy, the kettled, ice-contact deposits are typically very variable in grain size over short distances. Many of the deposits occur as coarsening-upward deltaic sequences (Peacock and Merritt, 2000d). As well as the ubiquitous clasts of hard metamorphic and igneous rocks, some of the more gravelly units contain sparse shells and clasts of soft sedimentary rocks (of Triassic, Jurassic and Early Cretaceous ages). Typical sections occur in pits near Blackhills (at NJ 926 609 and NJ 926 615) [[Media:P104110.jpg|(P104110)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The terraced glaciofluvial deposits are composed predominantly of gravel derived from the local bedrock, but some of the lower lying spreads pass laterally into silt and clay. Considerable amounts of blown sand have accumulated adjacent to Loch Strathbeg. Along the coast, the blown sand is mainly medium grained and composed of quartz with minor amounts of feldspar; shell fragments and small pebbles are present locally.&lt;br /&gt;
Several deeply weathered outcrops of Devonian conglomerate constitute potential sources of coarse gravel in the area to the west of New Aberdour. This material, which is decomposed to a depth of several metres locally, also extends on to the adjoining Banff sheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_96E_Banff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21695</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 96E Banff, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_96E_Banff,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21695"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:39:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 96E Banff =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915373.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 96E Banff. P915373.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The most notable sand and gravel resources of Sheet 96E [[Media:P915373.png|(P915373)]] lie west of the valley of the River Deveron, between Banff and Boyndie (NJ 640 638). Glaciofluvial deposits assigned to the Blackhills Sand and Gravel Formation form the Hills of Boyndie, stretching south-westwards from Banff to Ladysbridge (NJ 651 636). Sand predominates, but gravel is more abundant towards the margins of the spreads. Clasts of quartzite, feldspathic red sandstone, granite and basic igneous rocks predominate within the gravel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A significant resource of glaciofluvial sand and gravel is present on the western side of the valley of the River Deveron, but building developments in Banff have extended across the northern portion. Less attractive resources of water-saturated sand and gravel occur beneath the floodplain of the Deveron, underlying 2 to 3 m of alluvial silt. Farther east, in the vicinity of Paddocklaw Farm (NJ 662 617), Peacock et al. (1977) record sand and gravel containing clasts of metagreywacke, gneissose psammite, semipelite and slatey pelite. Notable resources may also be present within the glaciofluvial deposits flanking the Burn of Fishrie near its confluence with the River Deveron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_96W_Portsoy,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21694</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 96W Portsoy, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_96W_Portsoy,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21694"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:37:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 96W Portsoy =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915372.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 96W Portsoy. P915372.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Deposits of sand and gravel are less widespread in the Portsoy district [[Media:P915372.png|(P915372)]]. Notable resources are present within terraced glaciofluvial deposits in the valley of the Burn of Boyne and which extend across the interfluve to reach the Burn of Durn south of Portsoy. Less extensive terraced deposits occur in the valley of the Burn of Durn, upstream of Damheads (NJ 580 635) where they have been worked in a pit near Butterytack (NJ 568 613).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the town of Cullen is built on sandy glaciofluvial deposits, which were formerly worked at Gallows Hill (NJ 513 664). Potentially workable deposits of sand may occur beneath silts and clays in the valley of the Burn of Cullen, but they would lie close to, or below, the water table. Other resources include the well-rounded cobble gravels forming moundy topography along the coast, inland of Whyntie Head (NJ 630 660), and sands that underlie rounded hillocks in the vicinity of Home Farm (NJ 500 661), on the western side of the valley of the Burn of Cullen. Extensive, high quality resources may occur within the glaciofluvial sheet and ice-contact deposits, in the vicinity of Headtown (NJ 612 583). These ice-contact deposits extend beyond the southern margin of Sheet 96W, where they are seen to be predominantly composed of fine- to medium-grained sand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_95_Elgin,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21693</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 95 Elgin, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_95_Elgin,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21693"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:28:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: /* Sheet 95 Elgin */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 95 Elgin =&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915371.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of tills in the Elgin district. P915371.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The spreads of sand and gravel on Sheet 95 [[Media:P915371.png|(P915371)]] constitute some of the most extensive resources in north-east Scotland. They have been assessed in detail only in the vicinity of Garmouth (Resource Sheet NJ 63), but are described more generally by Peacock et al. (1968) and as part of the resources of the Moray district (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the glaciofluvial sand and gravel between Elgin and the Spey valley occurs in coarsening-upward sequences that were laid down as fans at the mouths of drainage channels or in temporary ice-dammed lakes. Overall, these deposits fine north-eastwards and much of the sequence comprises silty and clayey glaciolacustrine sediment with a capping of sand and gravel. Other kettled terraced spreads were laid down on bodies of stagnant ice during deglaciation. Moundy sandy deposits predominate around Lhanbryde (NJ 274 612), west of Elgin, and towards the coast around Binn Hill (NJ 305 656). The topography of the ground to the north and north east of Elgin is generally more subdued and is underlain by sand, silt and clay with minor amounts of gravel. These fine-grained sediments are commonly capped by or merge with gravelly Late-glacial raised beach deposits. The sandy glaciofluvial deposits around Elgin are worked in a pit at Woodside (NJ 237 632) and up to 15 m of fine-grained, bedded sand with minor amounts of pebble and cobble gravel was formerly worked in a pit at Duffushillock (NJ 216 596), in the moundy deposits south of Elgin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104109.jpg|left|thumbnail|Deltaic foresets dipping eastwards, capped by poorly stratified topset gravel at Lochinvar pit, near Elgin. P104109.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The flights of terraces flanking the lower reaches of the Spey and Lossie comprise thick, easily worked resources of sand and gravel, lying above the water table. The kettled upper terraces flanking the Spey are composed of glaciofluvial gravel, which merges into moundy ice-contact deposits around Garmouth. Some of the lower gravel terraces are flat-topped and probably of Late-glacial age. An extensive gravel terrace on the western flank of the River Lossie is worked at Lochinvar Pit (NJ 183 614) [[Media:P104109.jpg|(P104109)]]. The gravelly alluvial deposits of the river valleys are less attractive, as most of the resource lies below the water table and could only be worked by dredging. The postglacial raised beach gravels have been worked extensively for shingle, but contain little sand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the sand and gravel which flanks the coast between the mouth of Tynet Burn and Buckie, the only other resources of sand and pebbly sand occur as small moundy spreads on the interfluve to the east of the Spey. Exposures in the coastal area suggest that the former deposits are composed mainly of medium- to fine-grained sand. About 8 m of cross-bedded sand was recorded from a pit immediately west-north-west of Mains of Tannochy (NJ 386 637) and a similar thickness of more pebbly sand was formerly exposed in a pit on the eastern bank of the Gollachie Burn (at NJ 406 647).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average grading of the near-surface gravelly deposits flanking the River Spey between Fochabers and the coast, is illustrated in Aitken et al. (1979; fig.2). This shows that most of the resources consist of gravel and sandy gravel. The uniform composition of the clasts from these deposits is illustrated in [[Media:P915335.png|P915335]]. Tough clasts of psammite and quartzite predominate and the proportion of non-durable rock types is minimal. The grading and composition of aggregates from the Garmouth area are probably representative of most of the sands and gravels in the lower reaches of the Spey valley.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_95_Elgin,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21692</id>
		<title>Sand and gravel resources, Sheet 95 Elgin, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Sand_and_gravel_resources,_Sheet_95_Elgin,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21692"/>
		<updated>2015-09-16T08:27:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Sheet 95 Elgin =&lt;br /&gt;
The spreads of sand and gravel on Sheet 95 [[Media:P915371.png|(P915371)]] constitute some of the most extensive resources in north-east Scotland. They have been assessed in detail only in the vicinity of Garmouth (Resource Sheet NJ 63), but are described more generally by Peacock et al. (1968) and as part of the resources of the Moray district (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915371.png|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of tills in the Elgin district. P915371.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the glaciofluvial sand and gravel between Elgin and the Spey valley occurs in coarsening-upward sequences that were laid down as fans at the mouths of drainage channels or in temporary ice-dammed lakes. Overall, these deposits fine north-eastwards and much of the sequence comprises silty and clayey glaciolacustrine sediment with a capping of sand and gravel. Other kettled terraced spreads were laid down on bodies of stagnant ice during deglaciation. Moundy sandy deposits predominate around Lhanbryde (NJ 274 612), west of Elgin, and towards the coast around Binn Hill (NJ 305 656). The topography of the ground to the north and north east of Elgin is generally more subdued and is underlain by sand, silt and clay with minor amounts of gravel. These fine-grained sediments are commonly capped by or merge with gravelly Late-glacial raised beach deposits. The sandy glaciofluvial deposits around Elgin are worked in a pit at Woodside (NJ 237 632) and up to 15 m of fine-grained, bedded sand with minor amounts of pebble and cobble gravel was formerly worked in a pit at Duffushillock (NJ 216 596), in the moundy deposits south of Elgin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P104109.jpg|left|thumbnail|Deltaic foresets dipping eastwards, capped by poorly stratified topset gravel at Lochinvar pit, near Elgin. P104109.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The flights of terraces flanking the lower reaches of the Spey and Lossie comprise thick, easily worked resources of sand and gravel, lying above the water table. The kettled upper terraces flanking the Spey are composed of glaciofluvial gravel, which merges into moundy ice-contact deposits around Garmouth. Some of the lower gravel terraces are flat-topped and probably of Late-glacial age. An extensive gravel terrace on the western flank of the River Lossie is worked at Lochinvar Pit (NJ 183 614) [[Media:P104109.jpg|(P104109)]]. The gravelly alluvial deposits of the river valleys are less attractive, as most of the resource lies below the water table and could only be worked by dredging. The postglacial raised beach gravels have been worked extensively for shingle, but contain little sand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915335.png|thumbnail|Composition of workable gravel deposits between Elgin and Aberdeen. P915335.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the sand and gravel which flanks the coast between the mouth of Tynet Burn and Buckie, the only other resources of sand and pebbly sand occur as small moundy spreads on the interfluve to the east of the Spey. Exposures in the coastal area suggest that the former deposits are composed mainly of medium- to fine-grained sand. About 8 m of cross-bedded sand was recorded from a pit immediately west-north-west of Mains of Tannochy (NJ 386 637) and a similar thickness of more pebbly sand was formerly exposed in a pit on the eastern bank of the Gollachie Burn (at NJ 406 647).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average grading of the near-surface gravelly deposits flanking the River Spey between Fochabers and the coast, is illustrated in Aitken et al. (1979; fig.2). This shows that most of the resources consist of gravel and sandy gravel. The uniform composition of the clasts from these deposits is illustrated in [[Media:P915335.png|P915335]]. Tough clasts of psammite and quartzite predominate and the proportion of non-durable rock types is minimal. The grading and composition of aggregates from the Garmouth area are probably representative of most of the sands and gravels in the lower reaches of the Spey valley.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21682</id>
		<title>Aggregate testing results, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21682"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:32:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Aggregate testing results across the district =&lt;br /&gt;
The strength and durability of aggregates from the district have been measured by a series of mechanical and physical tests. These were conducted in accordance with BS 812 (British Standards Institution, 1975), on the 10 to 14 mm gravel fraction taken from composite samples collected in each area of assessment. The tests included measurement of aggregate impact value (AIV), aggregate crushing value (ACV), ten per cent fines value, relative density (on both an oven-dried and surface dried basis), water absorption and measured concrete drying shrinkage. Aggregate impact value residue (AIVR) and aggregate crushing value residue (ACVR), as defined by Ramsay (1965) and Ramsay et al. (1973, 1974) were also calculated. Inferred concrete drying shrinkage values (which provide a crude estimate of concrete drying shrinkage) were determined, using the relationship between water absorption of gravel and concrete drying shrinkage established by Edwards (1970). The test results are summarised in the table below and discussed more fully in each Mineral Assessment Report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Summary results of mechanical and physical testing of naturally occurring gravels from north-east Scotland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Test||Garmouth MAR 41||Peterhead MAR 58||Ellon MAR 76||Aberdeen MAR 146||Inverurie Stonehaven MAR 148||Strachan Auchenblae Catterline Mar 149||Combined mean&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value||71&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (11-18)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||23 (16-38)||22 (14-31)||28 (22-34)||25 (17-32)||27 (19-31)||24 (11-38)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value Residue||-||-||-||35 (29-43)||35 (26-52)||33 (26-41)||34 (26-52)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value||19 (13-20)||-||-||-||20 (16-24)||-||2 (13-24)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value Residue||-||-||-||-||39 (34-48)||-||39 (34-48)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Ten percent Fines Value||-||190 (95-270)||170 (120-280)||170 (120-230)||-||150 (95-240)||170 (95-280)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (oven dried basis)||2.57 (2.53-2.60)||2.50 (2.45-2.54)||2.59 (2.51-2.63)||2.58 (2.52-2.62)||2.55 (2.51-2.62)||2.53 (2.44-2.63)||2.55 (2.44-2.63)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (surface dried basis)||2.60 (2.57-2.62)||2.56 (2.51-2.59)||2.63 (2.58-2.66)||2.62 (2.56-2.67)||2.60 (2.56-2.68)||2.59 (2.53-2.73)||2.60 (2.51-2.73)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Apparent Relative Density||2.65 (2.64-2.66)||2.66 (2.60-2.76)||2.71 (2.64-2.75)||2.67 (2.62-2.70)||2.69 (2.62-2.82)||2.69 (2.59-2.99)||2.68 (2.59-2.99)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Water Absorption (%)||1.1 (0.7-1.6)||2.1 (1.7-2.4)||1.8 (0.9-2.9)||1.3 (0.8-1.6)||2.0 (1.1-2.9)||2.2 (0.9-4.8)||1.8 (0.7-4.8)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inferred Drying Shrinkage&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (concrete) (%)||0.054 (0.044-0.063)||0.071 (0.064-0.077)||0.066 (0.048-0.088)||0.056 (0.046-0.063)||0.070 (0.052-0.088)||0.075 (0.047-0.126)||0.065 (0.044-0.126)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Measured Drying Shrinkage (concrete) (%)||-||-||-||0.048 (0.039-0.054)||0.049 (0.040-0.065)||0.055 (0.040-0.073)||0.051 (0.039-0.073)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Averaged results; these are listed fully in each of the six Mineral Assessment Reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Figures in parentheses refer to the range of results.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; It is emphasised that the ‘inferred’ drying shrinkage values quoted for concrete are obtained&lt;br /&gt;
indirectly. They are probably anomalously high.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIV and water absorption results from the Garmouth assessment are the lowest from any aggregates tested during the assessments in north-east Scotland and suggest that these gravels are particularly durable. In general, the other mechanical and physical tests also show a smaller variation (range) of results than from any other assessment area and suggest that the resources are relatively homogeneous. The Garmouth results are probably representative of the sands and gravels in the lower Spey valley and reflect their high content of psammite and fresh granite clasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results from the Ellon and Peterhead assessment areas are similar, but the AIV and water absorption results are higher than those from the Garmouth area, probably reflecting the higher proportion of nondurable rock types present in the gravels in the eastern parts of the district. The AIV figures are also higher than those obtained by Edwards (1970) from several gravel samples from north-east Scotland. However, they are comparable to values quoted by Edwards for ‘glacial mainly granite’ gravels in the district. Overall, most of the other testing results given in the table above also suggest aggregates of poorer strength and much greater water absorption than inferred by Edwards. A probable explanation for these disparities is that Edwards tested processed samples from stockpiles at working pits, whereas most of the samples tested during the assessment studies also included unprocessed material, collected from boreholes and trial pits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanical and physical testing results from aggregates in the Aberdeen assessment area indicate that they are generally significantly weaker than those from the Ellon and Peterhead areas. The range of values is also more restricted, suggesting relatively homogeneous gravel resources within the Aberdeen assessment area as a whole. Apparent relative density values are comparable to those from all of the other assessments, but the low water absorption values are comparable to those from gravels in the Garmouth area. As the gravels from Garmouth and Aberdeen are both mainly composed of granitic and psammitic clasts, the relative weakness of the Aberdeen material may reflect the derivation of many of the granite clasts from weathered bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The testing results from the Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline assessment areas are similar to those from Aberdeen, though they both have higher water absorption values. These higher values are thought to reflect the presence of highly weathered volcanic clasts and porous clasts of mudstone and sandstone within the gravels of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in Strathmore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the variations recorded across the district the test results indicate that much of the coarse aggregate appears suitable for use in concrete. Nearly all of the measured concrete drying shrinkage values for aggregates from Aberdeen, Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline areas are below 0.065 per cent, suggesting that the aggregate is suitable for inclusion in concrete for ‘most applications’ (Building Research Establishment, 1968; Smith and Collis, 1993). The lower AIV figures and comparable water absorption figures from the Garmouth, Peterhead and Ellon assessments indicate that coarse aggregate from these areas is also probably suitable for more specific types of concrete. This conclusion is supported by the inferred concrete drying shrinkage figures, which, although anomalously high when compared with actual measurements (see table above), are generally below 0.085 per cent. Hence, most aggregate from the district is at least suitable for making general purpose concrete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21681</id>
		<title>Aggregate testing results, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21681"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:29:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Aggregate testing results across the district =&lt;br /&gt;
The strength and durability of aggregates from the district have been measured by a series of mechanical and physical tests. These were conducted in accordance with BS 812 (British Standards Institution, 1975), on the 10 to 14 mm gravel fraction taken from composite samples collected in each area of assessment. The tests included measurement of aggregate impact value (AIV), aggregate crushing value (ACV), ten per cent fines value, relative density (on both an oven-dried and surface dried basis), water absorption and measured concrete drying shrinkage. Aggregate impact value residue (AIVR) and aggregate crushing value residue (ACVR), as defined by Ramsay (1965) and Ramsay et al. (1973, 1974) were also calculated. Inferred concrete drying shrinkage values (which provide a crude estimate of concrete drying shrinkage) were determined, using the relationship between water absorption of gravel and concrete drying shrinkage established by Edwards (1970). The test results are summarised in the table below and discussed more fully in each Mineral Assessment Report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Summary results of mechanical and physical testing of naturally occurring gravels from north-east Scotland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Test||Garmouth MAR 41||Peterhead MAR 58||Ellon MAR 76||Aberdeen MAR 146||Inverurie Stonehaven MAR 148||Strachan Auchenblae Catterline Mar 149||Combined mean&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value||71&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (11-18)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||23 (16-38)||22 (14-31)||28 (22-34)||25 (17-32)||27 (19-31)||24 (11-38)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value Residue||-||-||-||35 (29-43)||35 (26-52)||33 (26-41)||34 (26-52)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value||19 (13-20)||-||-||-||20 (16-24)||-||2 (13-24)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value Residue||-||-||-||-||39 (34-48)||-||39 (34-48)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Ten percent Fines Value||-||190 (95-270)||170 (120-280)||170 (120-230)||-||150 (95-240)||170 (95-280)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (oven dried basis)||2.57 (2.53-2.60)||2.50 (2.45-2.54)||2.59 (2.51-2.63)||2.58 (2.52-2.62)||2.55 (2.51-2.62)||2.53 (2.44-2.63)||2.55 (2.44-2.63)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (surface dried basis)||2.60 (2.57-2.62)||2.56 (2.51-2.59)||2.63 (2.58-2.66)||2.62 (2.56-2.67)||2.60 (2.56-2.68)||2.59 (2.53-2.73)||2.60 (2.51-2.73)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Apparent Relative Density||2.65 (2.64-2.66)||2.66 (2.60-2.76)||2.71 (2.64-2.75)||2.67 (2.62-2.70)||2.69 (2.62-2.82)||2.69 (2.59-2.99)||2.68 (2.59-2.99)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Water Absorption (%)||1.1 (0.7-1.6)||2.1 (1.7-2.4)||1.8 (0.9-2.9)||1.3 (0.8-1.6)||2.0 (1.1-2.9)||2.2 (0.9-4.8)||1.8 (0.7-4.8)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inferred Drying Shrinkage&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (concrete) (%)||0.054 (0.044-0.063)||0.071 (0.064-0.077)||0.066 (0.048-0.088)||0.056 (0.046-0.063)||0.070 (0.052-0.088)||0.075 (0.047-0.126)||0.065 (0.044-0.126)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Measured Drying Shrinkage (concrete) (%)||-||-||-||0.048 (0.039-0.054)||0.049 (0.040-0.065)||0.055 (0.040-0.073)||0.051 (0.039-0.073)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Averaged results; these are listed fully in each of the six Mineral Assessment Reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Figures in parentheses refer to the range of results.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; It is emphasised that the ‘inferred’ drying shrinkage values quoted for concrete are obtained&lt;br /&gt;
indirectly. They are probably anomalously high.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIV and water absorption results from the Garmouth assessment are the lowest from any aggregates tested during the assessments in north-east Scotland and suggest that these gravels are particularly durable. In general, the other mechanical and physical tests also show a smaller variation (range) of results than from any other assessment area and suggest that the resources are relatively homogeneous. The Garmouth results are probably representative of the sands and gravels in the lower Spey valley and reflect their high content of psammite and fresh granite clasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results from the Ellon and Peterhead assessment areas are similar, but the AIV and water absorption results are higher than those from the Garmouth area, probably reflecting the higher proportion of nondurable rock types present in the gravels in the eastern parts of the district. The AIV figures are also higher than those obtained by Edwards (1970) from several gravel samples from north-east Scotland. However, they are comparable to values quoted by Edwards for ‘glacial mainly granite’ gravels in the district. Overall, most of the other testing results given in Table A2.2 also suggest aggregates of poorer strength and much greater water absorption than inferred by Edwards. A probable explanation for these disparities is that Edwards tested processed samples from stockpiles at working pits, whereas most of the samples tested during the assessment studies also included unprocessed material, collected from boreholes and trial pits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanical and physical testing results from aggregates in the Aberdeen assessment area indicate that they are generally significantly weaker than those from the Ellon and Peterhead areas. The range of values is also more restricted, suggesting relatively homogeneous gravel resources within the Aberdeen assessment area as a whole. Apparent relative density values are comparable to those from all of the other assessments, but the low water absorption values are comparable to those from gravels in the Garmouth area. As the gravels from Garmouth and Aberdeen are both mainly composed of granitic and psammitic clasts, the relative weakness of the Aberdeen material may reflect the derivation of many of the granite clasts from weathered bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The testing results from the Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline assessment areas are similar to those from Aberdeen, though they both have higher water absorption values. These higher values are thought to reflect the presence of highly weathered volcanic clasts and porous clasts of mudstone and sandstone within the gravels of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in Strathmore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the variations recorded across the district the test results indicate that much of the coarse aggregate appears suitable for use in concrete. Nearly all of the measured concrete drying shrinkage values for aggregates from Aberdeen, Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline areas are below 0.065 per cent, suggesting that the aggregate is suitable for inclusion in concrete for ‘most applications’ (Building Research Establishment, 1968; Smith and Collis, 1993). The lower AIV figures and comparable water absorption figures from the Garmouth, Peterhead and Ellon assessments indicate that coarse aggregate from these areas is also probably suitable for more specific types of concrete. This conclusion is supported by the inferred concrete drying shrinkage figures, which, although anomalously high when compared with actual measurements (see Table A2.2), are generally below 0.085 per cent. Hence, most aggregate from the district is at least suitable for making general purpose concrete.&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21680</id>
		<title>Aggregate testing results, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21680"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:28:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Aggregate testing results across the district =&lt;br /&gt;
The strength and durability of aggregates from the district have been measured by a series of mechanical and physical tests. These were conducted in accordance with BS 812 (British Standards Institution, 1975), on the 10 to 14 mm gravel fraction taken from composite samples collected in each area of assessment. The tests included measurement of aggregate impact value (AIV), aggregate crushing value (ACV), ten per cent fines value, relative density (on both an oven-dried and surface dried basis), water absorption and measured concrete drying shrinkage. Aggregate impact value residue (AIVR) and aggregate crushing value residue (ACVR), as defined by Ramsay (1965) and Ramsay et al. (1973, 1974) were also calculated. Inferred concrete drying shrinkage values (which provide a crude estimate of concrete drying shrinkage) were determined, using the relationship between water absorption of gravel and concrete drying shrinkage established by Edwards (1970). The test results are summarised in the table below and discussed more fully in each Mineral Assessment Report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Summary results of mechanical and physical testing of naturally occurring gravels from north-east Scotland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Test||Garmouth MAR 41||Peterhead MAR 58||Ellon MAR 76||Aberdeen MAR 146||Inverurie Stonehaven MAR 148||Strachan Auchenblae Catterline Mar 149||Combined mean&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value||71&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (11-18)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||23 (16-38)||22 (14-31)||28 (22-34)||25 (17-32)||27 (19-31)||24 (11-38)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value Residue||-||-||-||35 (29-43)||35 (26-52)||33 (26-41)||34 (26-52)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value||19 (13-20)||-||-||-||20 (16-24)||-||2 (13-24)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value Residue||-||-||-||-||39 (34-48)||-||39 (34-48)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Ten percent Fines Value||-||190 (95-270)||170 (120-280)||170 (120-230)||-||150 (95-240)||170 (95-280)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (oven dried basis)||2.57 (2.53-2.60)||2.50 (2.45-2.54)||2.59 (2.51-2.63)||2.58 (2.52-2.62)||2.55 (2.51-2.62)||2.53 (2.44-2.63)||2.55 (2.44-2.63)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (surface dried basis)||2.60 (2.57-2.62)||2.56 (2.51-2.59)||2.63 (2.58-2.66)||2.62 (2.56-2.67)||2.60 (2.56-2.68)||2.59 (2.53-2.73)||2.60 (2.51-2.73)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Apparent Relative Density||2.65 (2.64-2.66)||2.66 (2.60-2.76)||2.71 (2.64-2.75)||2.67 (2.62-2.70)||2.69 (2.62-2.82)||2.69 (2.59-2.99)||2.68 (2.59-2.99)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Water Absorption (%)||1.1 (0.7-1.6)||2.1 (1.7-2.4)||1.8 (0.9-2.9)||1.3 (0.8-1.6)||2.0 (1.1-2.9)||2.2 (0.9-4.8)||1.8 (0.7-4.8)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inferred Drying Shrinkage&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (concrete) (%)||0.054 (0.044-0.063)||0.071 (0.064-0.077)||0.066 (0.048-0.088)||0.056 (0.046-0.063)||0.070 (0.052-0.088)||0.075 (0.047-0.126)||0.065 (0.044-0.126)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Measured Drying Shrinkage (concrete) (%)||||||||0.048 (0.039-0.054)||0.049 (0.040-0.065)||0.055 (0.040-0.073)||0.051 (0.039-0.073)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Averaged results; these are listed fully in each of the six Mineral Assessment Reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Figures in parentheses refer to the range of results.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; It is emphasised that the ‘inferred’ drying shrinkage values quoted for concrete are obtained&lt;br /&gt;
indirectly. They are probably anomalously high.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIV and water absorption results from the Garmouth assessment are the lowest from any aggregates tested during the assessments in north-east Scotland and suggest that these gravels are particularly durable. In general, the other mechanical and physical tests also show a smaller variation (range) of results than from any other assessment area and suggest that the resources are relatively homogeneous. The Garmouth results are probably representative of the sands and gravels in the lower Spey valley and reflect their high content of psammite and fresh granite clasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results from the Ellon and Peterhead assessment areas are similar, but the AIV and water absorption results are higher than those from the Garmouth area, probably reflecting the higher proportion of nondurable rock types present in the gravels in the eastern parts of the district. The AIV figures are also higher than those obtained by Edwards (1970) from several gravel samples from north-east Scotland. However, they are comparable to values quoted by Edwards for ‘glacial mainly granite’ gravels in the district. Overall, most of the other testing results given in Table A2.2 also suggest aggregates of poorer strength and much greater water absorption than inferred by Edwards. A probable explanation for these disparities is that Edwards tested processed samples from stockpiles at working pits, whereas most of the samples tested during the assessment studies also included unprocessed material, collected from boreholes and trial pits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanical and physical testing results from aggregates in the Aberdeen assessment area indicate that they are generally significantly weaker than those from the Ellon and Peterhead areas. The range of values is also more restricted, suggesting relatively homogeneous gravel resources within the Aberdeen assessment area as a whole. Apparent relative density values are comparable to those from all of the other assessments, but the low water absorption values are comparable to those from gravels in the Garmouth area. As the gravels from Garmouth and Aberdeen are both mainly composed of granitic and psammitic clasts, the relative weakness of the Aberdeen material may reflect the derivation of many of the granite clasts from weathered bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The testing results from the Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline assessment areas are similar to those from Aberdeen, though they both have higher water absorption values. These higher values are thought to reflect the presence of highly weathered volcanic clasts and porous clasts of mudstone and sandstone within the gravels of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in Strathmore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the variations recorded across the district the test results indicate that much of the coarse aggregate appears suitable for use in concrete. Nearly all of the measured concrete drying shrinkage values for aggregates from Aberdeen, Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline areas are below 0.065 per cent, suggesting that the aggregate is suitable for inclusion in concrete for ‘most applications’ (Building Research Establishment, 1968; Smith and Collis, 1993). The lower AIV figures and comparable water absorption figures from the Garmouth, Peterhead and Ellon assessments indicate that coarse aggregate from these areas is also probably suitable for more specific types of concrete. This conclusion is supported by the inferred concrete drying shrinkage figures, which, although anomalously high when compared with actual measurements (see Table A2.2), are generally below 0.085 per cent. Hence, most aggregate from the district is at least suitable for making general purpose concrete.&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21679</id>
		<title>Aggregate testing results, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Aggregate_testing_results,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21679"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:20:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Aggregate testing results across the district =&lt;br /&gt;
The strength and durability of aggregates from the district have been measured by a series of mechanical and physical tests. These were conducted in accordance with BS 812 (British Standards Institution, 1975), on the 10 to 14 mm gravel fraction taken from composite samples collected in each area of assessment. The tests included measurement of aggregate impact value (AIV), aggregate crushing value (ACV), ten per cent fines value, relative density (on both an oven-dried and surface dried basis), water absorption and measured concrete drying shrinkage. Aggregate impact value residue (AIVR) and aggregate crushing value residue (ACVR), as defined by Ramsay (1965) and Ramsay et al. (1973, 1974) were also calculated. Inferred concrete drying shrinkage values (which provide a crude estimate of concrete drying shrinkage) were determined, using the relationship between water absorption of gravel and concrete drying shrinkage established by Edwards (1970). The test results are summarised in the table below and discussed more fully in each Mineral Assessment Report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Summary results of mechanical and physical testing of naturally occurring gravels from north-east Scotland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Test||Garmouth MAR 41||Peterhead MAR 58||Ellon MAR 76||Aberdeen MAR 146||Inverurie Stonehaven MAR 148||Strachan Auchenblae Catterline Mar 149||Combined mean&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value||71&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (11-18)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||23 (16-38)||22 (14-31)||28 (22-34)||25 (17-32)||27 (19-31)||24 (11-38)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Impact Value Residue||-||||||35 (29-43)||35 (26-52)||33 (26-41)||34 (26-52)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value||1 (13-20)||-||-||-||20 (16-24)||-||2 (13-24)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aggregate Crushing Value Residue Ten percent Fines Value||-||- 190 (95-270)||- 170 (120-280)||- 17 (120-230)||39 (34-48) -||150 (95-240)||39 (34-48) 170 (95-280)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (oven dried basis)||2.57 (2.53-2.60)||2.50 (2.45-2.54)||2.59 (2.51-2.63)||2.58 (2.52-2.62)||2.55 (2.51-2.62)||2.53 (2.44-2.63)||2.55 (2.44-2.63)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Relative Density (surface dried basis)||2.60 (2.57-2.62)||2.56 (2.51-2.59)||2.63 (2.58-2.66)||2.62 (2.56-2.67)||2.60 (2.56-2.68)||2.59 (2.53-2.73)||2.60 (2.51-2.73)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Apparent Relative Density||2.65 (2.64-2.66)||2.66 (2.60-2.76)||2.71 (2.64-2.75)||2.67 (2.62-2.70)||2.69 (2.62-2.82)||2.69 (2.59-2.99)||2.68 (2.59-2.99)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Water Absorption (%)||1.1 (0.7-1.6)||2.1 (1.7-2.4)||1.8 (0.9-2.9)||1.3 (0.8-1.6)||2.0 (1.1-2.9)||2.2 (0.9-4.8)||1.8 (0.7-4.8)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inferred Drying Shrinkage&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (concrete) (%)||0.054 (0.044-0.063)||0.071 (0.064-0.077)||0.066 (0.048-0.088)||0.056 (0.046-0.063)||0.070 (0.052-0.088)||0.075 (0.047-0.126)||0.065 (0.044-0.126)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Measured Drying Shrinkage (concrete) (%)||||||||0.048 (0.039-0.054)||0.049 (0.040-0.065)||0.055 (0.040-0.073)||0.051 (0.039-0.073)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Averaged results; these are listed fully in each of the six Mineral Assessment Reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Figures in parentheses refer to the range of results.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; It is emphasised that the ‘inferred’ drying shrinkage values quoted for concrete are obtained&lt;br /&gt;
indirectly. They are probably anomalously high.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIV and water absorption results from the Garmouth assessment are the lowest from any aggregates tested during the assessments in north-east Scotland and suggest that these gravels are particularly durable. In general, the other mechanical and physical tests also show a smaller variation (range) of results than from any other assessment area and suggest that the resources are relatively homogeneous. The Garmouth results are probably representative of the sands and gravels in the lower Spey valley and reflect their high content of psammite and fresh granite clasts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results from the Ellon and Peterhead assessment areas are similar, but the AIV and water absorption results are higher than those from the Garmouth area, probably reflecting the higher proportion of nondurable rock types present in the gravels in the eastern parts of the district. The AIV figures are also higher than those obtained by Edwards (1970) from several gravel samples from north-east Scotland. However, they are comparable to values quoted by Edwards for ‘glacial mainly granite’ gravels in the district. Overall, most of the other testing results given in Table A2.2 also suggest aggregates of poorer strength and much greater water absorption than inferred by Edwards. A probable explanation for these disparities is that Edwards tested processed samples from stockpiles at working pits, whereas most of the samples tested during the assessment studies also included unprocessed material, collected from boreholes and trial pits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanical and physical testing results from aggregates in the Aberdeen assessment area indicate that they are generally significantly weaker than those from the Ellon and Peterhead areas. The range of values is also more restricted, suggesting relatively homogeneous gravel resources within the Aberdeen assessment area as a whole. Apparent relative density values are comparable to those from all of the other assessments, but the low water absorption values are comparable to those from gravels in the Garmouth area. As the gravels from Garmouth and Aberdeen are both mainly composed of granitic and psammitic clasts, the relative weakness of the Aberdeen material may reflect the derivation of many of the granite clasts from weathered bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The testing results from the Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline assessment areas are similar to those from Aberdeen, though they both have higher water absorption values. These higher values are thought to reflect the presence of highly weathered volcanic clasts and porous clasts of mudstone and sandstone within the gravels of the Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation in Strathmore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the variations recorded across the district the test results indicate that much of the coarse aggregate appears suitable for use in concrete. Nearly all of the measured concrete drying shrinkage values for aggregates from Aberdeen, Inverurie–Stonehaven and Strachan–Auchenblae–Catterline areas are below 0.065 per cent, suggesting that the aggregate is suitable for inclusion in concrete for ‘most applications’ (Building Research Establishment, 1968; Smith and Collis, 1993). The lower AIV figures and comparable water absorption figures from the Garmouth, Peterhead and Ellon assessments indicate that coarse aggregate from these areas is also probably suitable for more specific types of concrete. This conclusion is supported by the inferred concrete drying shrinkage figures, which, although anomalously high when compared with actual measurements (see Table A2.2), are generally below 0.085 per cent. Hence, most aggregate from the district is at least suitable for making general purpose concrete.&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21678</id>
		<title>History of sand and gravel resource appraisal, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21678"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:03:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== History of resource appraisal ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first systematic descriptions of sand and gravel resources in north-east Scotland were published by the Geological Survey of Great Britain in Wartime Pamphlet 30 (Parts I and II). Part I dealt with deposits in the vicinity of Elgin, Banff and Aberdeen (Anderson, 1943); deposits around Stonehaven were considered in Part II (Anderson, 1945). A later descriptive account of the resources within the whole onshore area was published by the Institute of Geological Sciences (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The first detailed assessment of sand and gravel resources, involving the logging and sampling of boreholes and trial pits sunk specifically for assessment purposes, was undertaken around Garmouth (Spey Bay). It is described in Mineral Assessment Report (MAR) 41 (Aitken et al., 1979) [[Media:P915334.png|(P915334)]]. This was followed by Mineral Assessment Reports 58 and 76 detailing sand and gravel resources around Peterhead (McMillan and Aitken, 1981) and Ellon (Merritt, 1981), respectively. Preliminary studies were subsequently made of the sand and gravel deposits around Aberdeen (Merritt and Peacock, 1983a), Inverness, Nairn, Forres and Elgin (Merritt and Peacock, 1983b), and Strathmore (Aitken, 1983). Two later reports (MARs 146 and 148) detail resources around Aberdeen (Auton and Crofts, 1986) and around Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory and Stonehaven (Auton et al., 1988).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment data from MARs 58, 76, 46 and 148 were subsequently re-evaluated and condensed in a ‘summary assessment report’ covering the eastern part of the district (Merritt et al., 1988). This contains derivative maps, including ‘target’ resource maps at 1:50 000 scale, which show the thickest and more laterally extensive of the dry deposits of gravel and sand, together with the more extensive water-saturated gravels that could be exploited by dredging. It also presents analyses of the deposits for end-use suitability and illustrates the results as spider diagrams (compare with Laxton, 1992). Eighty four target resources were recognised and 20 ‘prime targets’ identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is emphasised that the suitability criteria presented in the report, and summarised at the end of this account, are generalised and based on computer manipulation of particle size analyses (gradings) mainly from borehole samples. The analyses also including some ‘as dug’ material from trial pits, workings and exposures. Sampling was undertaken at points within large spreads of inherently heterogeneous material. The results do not imply that aggregate from specific workings, or from within individual resources, could not meet some specific end-use requirements, following suitable onsite screening, washing, crushing and grading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further detailed assessment (MAR 149) was completed following the summary assessment report. It describes sand and gravel resources around Strachan, Auchenblae and Catterline (Auton et al., 1990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment surveys carried out between 1977 and 1990 were commissioned by the Scottish Development Department of the Scottish Office. Those since 1981 were funded by a consortium, which also included the Regional and District councils and representatives of the local aggregates industry. The number of boreholes, trial pits, workings and natural sections examined, and of resistivity soundings taken, during the course of each assessment is shown in the table below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Sand and gravel resource assessment surveys in north-east Scotland: primary data sources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Mineral Assessment Report name, number and date||Area (km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)||1:25 000 resource||Boreholes||Trial pits and natural sections||Resistivity soundings||Sampled workings&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Garmouth (41) [1979]||5||1||57||31||0||3&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Peterhead(58) [1981]||25||1||67||19||0||11&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Ellon (76) [1981]||343||2||61||39||0||15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aberdeen (146) [1986]||660||3||77||72||0||17&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory &amp;amp; Stonehaven (148) [1988]||398||2||54||51||43||38&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Strachan, Auchenblae &amp;amp; Catterline (149) [1990]||274||2||38||55||22||35&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Total||1987||11||354||297||65||119&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21677</id>
		<title>History of sand and gravel resource appraisal, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21677"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:02:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of resource appraisal ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first systematic descriptions of sand and gravel resources in north-east Scotland were published by the Geological Survey of Great Britain in Wartime Pamphlet 30 (Parts I and II). Part I dealt with deposits in the vicinity of Elgin, Banff and Aberdeen (Anderson, 1943); deposits around Stonehaven were considered in Part II (Anderson, 1945). A later descriptive account of the resources within the whole onshore area was published by the Institute of Geological Sciences (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The first detailed assessment of sand and gravel resources, involving the logging and sampling of boreholes and trial pits sunk specifically for assessment purposes, was undertaken around Garmouth (Spey Bay). It is described in Mineral Assessment Report (MAR) 41 (Aitken et al., 1979) [[Media:P915334.png|(P915334)]]. This was followed by Mineral Assessment Reports 58 and 76 detailing sand and gravel resources around Peterhead (McMillan and Aitken, 1981) and Ellon (Merritt, 1981), respectively. Preliminary studies were subsequently made of the sand and gravel deposits around Aberdeen (Merritt and Peacock, 1983a), Inverness, Nairn, Forres and Elgin (Merritt and Peacock, 1983b), and Strathmore (Aitken, 1983). Two later reports (MARs 146 and 148) detail resources around Aberdeen (Auton and Crofts, 1986) and around Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory and Stonehaven (Auton et al., 1988).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment data from MARs 58, 76, 46 and 148 were subsequently re-evaluated and condensed in a ‘summary assessment report’ covering the eastern part of the district (Merritt et al., 1988). This contains derivative maps, including ‘target’ resource maps at 1:50 000 scale, which show the thickest and more laterally extensive of the dry deposits of gravel and sand, together with the more extensive water-saturated gravels that could be exploited by dredging. It also presents analyses of the deposits for end-use suitability and illustrates the results as spider diagrams (compare with Laxton, 1992). Eighty four target resources were recognised and 20 ‘prime targets’ identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is emphasised that the suitability criteria presented in the report, and summarised at the end of this account, are generalised and based on computer manipulation of particle size analyses (gradings) mainly from borehole samples. The analyses also including some ‘as dug’ material from trial pits, workings and exposures. Sampling was undertaken at points within large spreads of inherently heterogeneous material. The results do not imply that aggregate from specific workings, or from within individual resources, could not meet some specific end-use requirements, following suitable onsite screening, washing, crushing and grading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further detailed assessment (MAR 149) was completed following the summary assessment report. It describes sand and gravel resources around Strachan, Auchenblae and Catterline (Auton et al., 1990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment surveys carried out between 1977 and 1990 were commissioned by the Scottish Development Department of the Scottish Office. Those since 1981 were funded by a consortium, which also included the Regional and District councils and representatives of the local aggregates industry. The number of boreholes, trial pits, workings and natural sections examined, and of resistivity soundings taken, during the course of each assessment is shown in the table below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Sand and gravel resource assessment surveys in north-east Scotland: primary data sources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Mineral Assessment Report name, number and date||Area (km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)||1:25 000 resource||Boreholes||Trial pits and natural sections||Resistivity soundings||Sampled workings&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Garmouth (41) [1979]||5||1||57||31||0||3&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Peterhead(58) [1981]||25||1||67||19||0||11&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Ellon (76) [1981]||343||2||61||39||0||15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aberdeen (146) [1986]||660||3||77||72||0||17&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory &amp;amp; Stonehaven (148) [1988]||398||2||54||51||43||38&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Strachan, Auchenblae &amp;amp; Catterline (149) [1990]||274||2||38||55||22||35&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Total||1987||11||354||297||65||119&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21676</id>
		<title>History of sand and gravel resource appraisal, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21676"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T13:01:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of resource appraisal ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first systematic descriptions of sand and gravel resources in north-east Scotland were published by the Geological Survey of Great Britain in Wartime Pamphlet 30 (Parts I and II). Part I dealt with deposits in the vicinity of Elgin, Banff and Aberdeen (Anderson, 1943); deposits around Stonehaven were considered in Part II (Anderson, 1945). A later descriptive account of the resources within the whole onshore area was published by the Institute of Geological Sciences (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The first detailed assessment of sand and gravel resources, involving the logging and sampling of boreholes and trial pits sunk specifically for assessment purposes, was undertaken around Garmouth (Spey Bay). It is described in Mineral Assessment Report (MAR) 41 (Aitken et al., 1979) [[Media:P915334.png|(P915334)]]. This was followed by Mineral Assessment Reports 58 and 76 detailing sand and gravel resources around Peterhead (McMillan and Aitken, 1981) and Ellon (Merritt, 1981), respectively. Preliminary studies were subsequently made of the sand and gravel deposits around Aberdeen (Merritt and Peacock, 1983a), Inverness, Nairn, Forres and Elgin (Merritt and Peacock, 1983b), and Strathmore (Aitken, 1983). Two later reports (MARs 146 and 148) detail resources around Aberdeen (Auton and Crofts, 1986) and around Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory and Stonehaven (Auton et al., 1988).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment data from MARs 58, 76, 46 and 148 were subsequently re-evaluated and condensed in a ‘summary assessment report’ covering the eastern part of the district (Merritt et al., 1988). This contains derivative maps, including ‘target’ resource maps at 1:50 000 scale, which show the thickest and more laterally extensive of the dry deposits of gravel and sand, together with the more extensive water-saturated gravels that could be exploited by dredging. It also presents analyses of the deposits for end-use suitability and illustrates the results as spider diagrams (compare with Laxton, 1992). Eighty four target resources were recognised and 20 ‘prime targets’ identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is emphasised that the suitability criteria presented in the report, and summarised at the end of this account, are generalised and based on computer manipulation of particle size analyses (gradings) mainly from borehole samples. The analyses also including some ‘as dug’ material from trial pits, workings and exposures. Sampling was undertaken at points within large spreads of inherently heterogeneous material. The results do not imply that aggregate from specific workings, or from within individual resources, could not meet some specific end-use requirements, following suitable onsite screening, washing, crushing and grading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further detailed assessment (MAR 149) was completed following the summary assessment report. It describes sand and gravel resources around Strachan, Auchenblae and Catterline (Auton et al., 1990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment surveys carried out between 1977 and 1990 were commissioned by the Scottish Development Department of the Scottish Office. Those since 1981 were funded by a consortium, which also included the Regional and District councils and representatives of the local aggregates industry. The number of boreholes, trial pits, workings and natural sections examined, and of resistivity soundings taken, during the course of each assessment is shown in the table below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Sand and gravel resource assessment surveys in north-east Scotland: primary data sources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Mineral Assessment Report name, number and date||Area (km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)||1:25 000 resource||Boreholes||Trial pits and natural sections||Resistivity soundings||Sampled workings&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Garmouth (41) [1979]||5||1||57||31||0||3&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Peterhead(58) [1981]||25||1||67||19||0||11&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Elton (76) [1981]||343||2||61||39||0||15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aberdeen (146) [1986]||660||3||77||72||0||17&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inventrie, Dunecht, Banchory &amp;amp; Stonehaven (148) [1988]||398||2||54||51||43||38&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Strachan, Auchenblae &amp;amp; Catterline (149) [1990]||274||2||38||55||22||35&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Total||1987||11||354||297||65||119&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21675</id>
		<title>History of sand and gravel resource appraisal, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21675"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T12:59:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of resource appraisal ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first systematic descriptions of sand and gravel resources in north-east Scotland were published by the Geological Survey of Great Britain in Wartime Pamphlet 30 (Parts I and II). Part I dealt with deposits in the vicinity of Elgin, Banff and Aberdeen (Anderson, 1943); deposits around Stonehaven were considered in Part II (Anderson, 1945). A later descriptive account of the resources within the whole onshore area was published by the Institute of Geological Sciences (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The first detailed assessment of sand and gravel resources, involving the logging and sampling of boreholes and trial pits sunk specifically for assessment purposes, was undertaken around Garmouth (Spey Bay). It is described in Mineral Assessment Report (MAR) 41 (Aitken et al., 1979) [[Media:P915334.png|(P915334)]]. This was followed by Mineral Assessment Reports 58 and 76 detailing sand and gravel resources around Peterhead (McMillan and Aitken, 1981) and Ellon (Merritt, 1981), respectively. Preliminary studies were subsequently made of the sand and gravel deposits around Aberdeen (Merritt and Peacock, 1983a), Inverness, Nairn, Forres and Elgin (Merritt and Peacock, 1983b), and Strathmore (Aitken, 1983). Two later reports (MARs 146 and 148) detail resources around Aberdeen (Auton and Crofts, 1986) and around Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory and Stonehaven (Auton et al., 1988).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment data from MARs 58, 76, 46 and 148 were subsequently re-evaluated and condensed in a ‘summary assessment report’ covering the eastern part of the district (Merritt et al., 1988). This contains derivative maps, including ‘target’ resource maps at 1:50 000 scale, which show the thickest and more laterally extensive of the dry deposits of gravel and sand, together with the more extensive water-saturated gravels that could be exploited by dredging. It also presents analyses of the deposits for end-use suitability and illustrates the results as spider diagrams (compare with Laxton, 1992). Eighty four target resources were recognised and 20 ‘prime targets’ identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is emphasised that the suitability criteria presented in the report, and summarised at the end of this account, are generalised and based on computer manipulation of particle size analyses (gradings) mainly from borehole samples. The analyses also including some ‘as dug’ material from trial pits, workings and exposures. Sampling was undertaken at points within large spreads of inherently heterogeneous material. The results do not imply that aggregate from specific workings, or from within individual resources, could not meet some specific end-use requirements, following suitable onsite screening, washing, crushing and grading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further detailed assessment (MAR 149) was completed following the summary assessment report. It describes sand and gravel resources around Strachan, Auchenblae and Catterline (Auton et al., 1990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment surveys carried out between 1977 and 1990 were commissioned by the Scottish Development Department of the Scottish Office. Those since 1981 were funded by a consortium, which also included the Regional and District councils and representatives of the local aggregates industry. The number of boreholes, trial pits, workings and natural sections examined, and of resistivity soundings taken, during the course of each assessment is shown in the table below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Sand and gravel resource assessment surveys in north-east Scotland: primary data sources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Mineral Assessment Report name, number and date||Area (km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)||1:25 000 resource||Boreholes||Trial pits and natural sections||Resistivity soundings||Sampled workings&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Garmouth (41) [1979]||5||1||57||31||0||3&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Peterhead(58) [1981]||25||1||67||19||0||11&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Elton (76) [1981]||343||2||61||39||0||15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aberdeen (146) [1986]||660||3||77||72||0||17&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inventrie, Dunecht,||398||2||54||51||43||38&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Banchory &amp;amp; Stonehaven (148) [1988]||||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Strachan, Auchenblae &amp;amp; Catterline (149) [1990]||274||2||38||55||22||35&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Total||1987||11||354||297||65||119&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21674</id>
		<title>History of sand and gravel resource appraisal, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=History_of_sand_and_gravel_resource_appraisal,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21674"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T12:59:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of resource appraisal ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first systematic descriptions of sand and gravel resources in north-east Scotland were published by the Geological Survey of Great Britain in Wartime Pamphlet 30 (Parts I and II). Part I dealt with deposits in the vicinity of Elgin, Banff and Aberdeen (Anderson, 1943); deposits around Stonehaven were considered in Part II (Anderson, 1945). A later descriptive account of the resources within the whole onshore area was published by the Institute of Geological Sciences (Peacock et al., 1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915334.png|thumbnail|Location of published sand and gravel resource assessment sheets and administrative areas in north-east Scotland. P915334.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The first detailed assessment of sand and gravel resources, involving the logging and sampling of boreholes and trial pits sunk specifically for assessment purposes, was undertaken around Garmouth (Spey Bay). It is described in Mineral Assessment Report (MAR) 41 (Aitken et al., 1979) [[Media:P915334.png|(P915334)]]. This was followed by Mineral Assessment Reports 58 and 76 detailing sand and gravel resources around Peterhead (McMillan and Aitken, 1981) and Ellon (Merritt, 1981), respectively. Preliminary studies were subsequently made of the sand and gravel deposits around Aberdeen (Merritt and Peacock, 1983a), Inverness, Nairn, Forres and Elgin (Merritt and Peacock, 1983b), and Strathmore (Aitken, 1983). Two later reports (MARs 146 and 148) detail resources around Aberdeen (Auton and Crofts, 1986) and around Inverurie, Dunecht, Banchory and Stonehaven (Auton et al., 1988).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment data from MARs 58, 76, 46 and 148 were subsequently re-evaluated and condensed in a ‘summary assessment report’ covering the eastern part of the district (Merritt et al., 1988). This contains derivative maps, including ‘target’ resource maps at 1:50 000 scale, which show the thickest and more laterally extensive of the dry deposits of gravel and sand, together with the more extensive water-saturated gravels that could be exploited by dredging. It also presents analyses of the deposits for end-use suitability and illustrates the results as spider diagrams (compare with Laxton, 1992). Eighty four target resources were recognised and 20 ‘prime targets’ identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is emphasised that the suitability criteria presented in the report, and summarised at the end of this account, are generalised and based on computer manipulation of particle size analyses (gradings) mainly from borehole samples. The analyses also including some ‘as dug’ material from trial pits, workings and exposures. Sampling was undertaken at points within large spreads of inherently heterogeneous material. The results do not imply that aggregate from specific workings, or from within individual resources, could not meet some specific end-use requirements, following suitable onsite screening, washing, crushing and grading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further detailed assessment (MAR 149) was completed following the summary assessment report. It describes sand and gravel resources around Strachan, Auchenblae and Catterline (Auton et al., 1990).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assessment surveys carried out between 1977 and 1990 were commissioned by the Scottish Development Department of the Scottish Office. Those since 1981 were funded by a consortium, which also included the Regional and District councils and representatives of the local aggregates industry. The number of boreholes, trial pits, workings and natural sections examined, and of resistivity soundings taken, during the course of each assessment is shown in yje table below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Sand and gravel resource assessment surveys in north-east Scotland: primary data sources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Mineral Assessment Report name, number and date||Area (km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)||1:25 000 resource||Boreholes||Trial pits and natural sections||Resistivity soundings||Sampled workings&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Garmouth (41) [1979]||5||1||57||31||0||3&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Peterhead(58) [1981]||25||1||67||19||0||11&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Elton (76) [1981]||343||2||61||39||0||15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Aberdeen (146) [1986]||660||3||77||72||0||17&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Inventrie, Dunecht,||398||2||54||51||43||38&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Banchory &amp;amp; Stonehaven (148) [1988]||||||||||||&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Strachan, Auchenblae &amp;amp; Catterline (149) [1990]||274||2||38||55||22||35&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Total||1987||11||354||297||65||119&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Burn_of_Benholm_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21673</id>
		<title>Burn of Benholm - locality, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php?title=Burn_of_Benholm_-_locality,_Cainozoic_of_north-east_Scotland&amp;diff=21673"/>
		<updated>2015-09-15T12:55:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lmo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;From: Merritt, J W, Auton, C A, Connell, E R, Hall, A M, and Peacock, J D. 2003. [[Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland)|Cainozoic geology and landscape evolution of north-east Scotland]]. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, sheets 66E, 67, 76E, 77, 86E, 87W, 87E, 95, 96W, 96E and 97 (Scotland).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
__FORCETOC__&lt;br /&gt;
= Burn of Benholm =&lt;br /&gt;
The shelly pebbly clays and peat lenses exposed beneath the Mill of Forest Till at the Burn of Benholm, provide new insights into the glacial history of eastern Scotland prior to the Late Devensian. The peat lenses are remnants of an Early Devensian interstadial deposit of OIS 5c or 5a age. Amino-acid ratios indicate that shells in the underlying clays are of OIS 9 age or older, and the fabric and composition of the shelly sediments are consistent with their emplacement as glacially deformed rafts of marine sediment. The rafts were transported onshore when Scandinavian ice occupied the North Sea basin, during a pre-Late Devensian glacial episode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915381.png|left|thumbnail|Glacial and glaciofluvial features and the distribution of glacigenic deposits on Sheet 67 Stonehaven. P915381.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P220762.jpg|thumbnail|Sheared lens of the Burn of Benholm Peat Bed within olive grey shelly clay and diamicton. P220762.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Exposures in the banks of the Burn of Benholm, 14 km north of Montrose [[Media:P915381.png|(P915381)]], have for many years revealed a Quaternary sequence that includes a dark grey clay containing fragmentary marine shells, overlain by reddish brown till. In one exposure lenses of peat and organic silt intervened between the units [[Media:P220762.jpg|(P220762)]]; most of the lenses were incorporated within the red till, near to its base (Campbell, 1934; Donner, 1960, 1979).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Particular controversy has focused on the age and origin of the shelly clay and on the age and biostratigraphical significance of the peat lenses (Gordon, 1993d). The shelly clay has been interpreted as a till deposited by ice moving onshore, at a time when Scottish and Scandinavian ice sheets coalesced in the North Sea basin (Campbell, 1934; Bremner, 1938; Donner, 1960). More recently, Sutherland (1981) proposed that the shelly sediment is an in situ cold water marine deposit formed as a result of significant isostatic loading during an Early Devensian glaciation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915333.png|thumbnail|Excavations and measured sections at the Burn of Benholm. P915333.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A pollen assemblage from peat collected by Campbell was subsequently described by Bremner (1943) as containing thermophilous tree pollen, and interpreted by him as indicating an interglacial environment. Later pollen analyses of the peat lenses, however, showed spectra dominated by non-arboreal types representing herb communities (Donner, 1960, 1979). This suggested an interstadial, rather than interglacial origin for the peat, which Donner (1960) initially interpreted as being of Late-glacial (Windermere) Interstadial age. He also proposed that the overlying red till was emplaced by landslipping, or gelifluction during the Loch Lomond Stadial a comparable origin to that proposed here for the Knockhill Wood succession (see above). A sample of the Burn of Benholm peat (Hel–1098) subsequently yielded a radiocarbon age of greater than 42 000 BP, which led Donner (1979) to reinterpret its age as being Early or Middle Devensian and the red till as being of the Main Late Devensian glaciation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the conflicting interpretations of the origin of the shelly clay and of the palaeoenvironmental conditions represented by the pollen in the peat deposits, a reinvestigation of the deposits at Burn of Benholm has been undertaken recently (Auton et al., 2000). The work included new excavations ([[Media:P915333.png|(P915333)]] adjacent to the stream sections first described by Campbell. One of these, trial pit BBP 4, revealed a new exposure of peat lenses beneath the base of the red till.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Burn of Benholm site (NO 795 691) comprises a series of stream sections and trial pits at about 45 m OD along the Burn of Benholm. The lithostratigraphy is summarised in the table below. The sections and trial pits clearly show the Mill of Forest Till overlying Benholm Clay Formation in the manner described by Campbell (1934). In some of the exposures a sharp, undulating contact, varying from subhorizontal to steeply dipping, occurs between the two formations. In other sections, such as BBP 2, a zone of shearing and churning occurs with red-brown till mixed with a more gravelly unit at the top of the Benholm Clay. In trial pit BBP 4 sheared and folded lenses of peat and sandy silt occur within this gravelly unit. In section RC 1 deformed units of Mill of Forest Till and the underlying Birnie Gravel abut a knoll of andesite bedrock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ style=&amp;quot;caption-side:top;&amp;quot;|Lithostratigraphy in the vicinity of the Burn of Benholm.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Lithostratigraphical unit||Lithology||Typical thickness (m)&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Drumlithie Sand and Gravel Formation &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||Rounded cobble gravel||up to 1.20&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Mill of Forest Till Formation &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||Stiff, moderate reddish brown, sandy clayey stony diamicton, containing clasts derived from the Devonian bedrock of Strathmore||up to 1.30&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Burn of Benholm Peat Bed &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||Peat and humic clay as sheared lenses in overlying till and underlying clay||up to 0.15&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Benholm Clay Formation &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||Stiff, olive-grey, calcareous, silty clay and clayey diamicton; with well dispersed clasts and fragments of marine shells, including Arctica islandica (L.). Clasts include basalt, gneiss, troctolite, limestone (including chalk), shale, flint and jet, as well as Lower Old Red Sandstone lithologies||up to 3.00&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Birnie Gravel Formation &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;||Moderate brown, clayey gravel||up to 3.00&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Bedrock||Andesite||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Mearns Drift Group, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Logie-Buchan Drift Group, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(3)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; East Grampian Drift Group&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clast orientations measured from the Mill of Forest Till all display tightly clustered fabrics suggesting subglacial deposition and indicate a north-easterly to east-north-easterly direction of ice movement. In contrast, eastwardly dipping stratification and north-westwardly dipping sheared contacts within the Benholm Clay, together with clasts of Mesozoic and Palaeozoic rocks are compatible with glacitectonic transport of the unit from offshore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A sparse assemblage of fragmentary bivalve molluscs (some of which are ‘polished’ and striated) has been recovered from the Benholm Clay Formation. The assemblage included &#039;&#039;Arctica islandica, Macoma balthica, Cersatoderma edule &#039;&#039;and &#039;&#039;Mya &#039;&#039;sp. and is of boreal to low arctic aspect, but suggests no particular age other than, broadly ‘Late Pleistocene’. Samples from the Benholm Clay have also yielded rich palynomorph assemblages, which were completely dominated by Early Carboniferous, Early and Late Cretaceous and Palaeogene forms (Harland, 1993). This reworked material was probably derived from the North Sea basin. Small numbers of Quaternary dinoflagellate cysts were also recorded. Two main taxa were recognised: &#039;&#039;Protoperidinium &#039;&#039;sp. and &#039;&#039;Bitectatodinium tepikiense&#039;&#039;. Both are indicative of north-temperate to arctic, cold-water marine environments, possibly in close proximity to ice (Harland, 1983; Dale, 1985). A sparse assemblage of agglutinating foraminifera was found in two samples from the clay (Wilkinson, 1993). All of the foraminifera are considered to be reworked and, although their age is unknown, it is unlikely that they are younger than Palaeogene. The paucity of indigenous microfossils and the abundance of reworked material are consistent with interpretation of the clay as a former offshore deposit, reworked and transported onshore by ice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pollen analyses were carried out by M J C Walker on four samples of organic material from the Burn of Benholm Peat Bed exposed in Trial Pit BBP 4 and are reported fully in Auton et al. (2000). The pollen spectra in all four samples are broadly similar and are comparable to those reported by Donner (1960, 1979), although a wider range of taxa has been recorded. Collectively, the pollen evidence points to an open tundra vegetation of damp heath and grassland, with patches of low scrub, and isolated stands of tree birch probably in more sheltered localities. This confirms the view that the site probably does not contain an interglacial record; rather, it represents an interstadial episode with summer temperatures slightly below those of the present day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A distinctive feature of the pollen spectra is the occurrence of a number of grains resembling &#039;&#039;Bruckenthalia spiculifolia&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Bruckenthalia &#039;&#039;pollen has been found at a number of interglacial sites in north-west Europe (e.g. Turner, 1970; Menke and Behre, 1973; Phillips, 1976; Hall, 1980), although the species appears to be more typically associated with Early Weichselian to Early Devensian Interstadial deposits (Whittington, 1994). Indeed, &#039;&#039;Bruckenthalia spiculifolia &#039;&#039;has been cited as a biostratigraphical marker for Early Weichselian Interstadials (Pons et al., 1992). Bruckenthalia has also been found at the Crossbrae Farm and Camp Fauld (Moss of Cruden) sites described above, which may also be of Early Devensian age (Whittington et al., 1993, 1998; Whittington, 1994).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three sets of ‘total’ amino-acid D/L (D-alloisoleucene: L-isoleucene) ratios have been determined on fragmentary shells of &#039;&#039;Arctica islandica &#039;&#039;collected from the Benholm Clay Formation in section RC 1. They are 0.37 (AAL 2950), 0.37 and 0.38 (AAL 2952) and 0.34 ± 0.024 (LOND 400). The third analysis (Lond 400) is regarded as the most accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915347.png|centre|600px|thumbnail|Correlation of lithostratigraphical units in north-east Scotland. P915347.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Conventional radiocarbon dating was carried out on a single bulk sample taken from a lens of the Burn of Benholm Peat in the upper part of the Benholm Clay Formation, between 2.0 and 2.3 m depth in trial pit BBP 4. The acid-insoluble residue was subdivided into its alkali soluble (humic) and alkali insoluble (humin) components for independent age measurement. The humic carbon sample, SRR–5201a, gave a radiocarbon age of greater than 50 850 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP; the humin sample, SRR–5201b, one of greater than 50 600 &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C years BP. Both dates are older than the upper limit of the radiocarbon chronology and provide a minimum (Mid-Devensian) age for the Benholm Peat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P915280.png|thumbnail|Quaternary stratigraphy of the central North Sea. P915280.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The interstadial affinity of the pollen, the presence of &#039;&#039;Bruckenthalia spiculifolia &#039;&#039;and infinite radiocarbon dates from the Burn of Benholm Peat Bed, all suggest that the peat lenses are remnants of an Early Devensian interstadial deposit of OIS 5c or 5a age or older [[Media:P915347.png|(P915347)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amino-acid ratios from the fragments of &#039;&#039;Arctica islandica &#039;&#039;suggest that the shells within the Benholm Clay Formation are of OIS 9 age or older. The fabric and composition of these shelly sediments are consistent with their emplacement as immature deformation till, formed by partial homogenisation of glacially transported rafts of marine sediment. The amino-acid ratios suggest that this till was deposited by ice during a post-OIS 9/11 glaciation. It may be derived from offshore sediments within the Coal Pit Formation, which is of probable Saalian to Weichselian age (Stoker et al., 1985), or from the Ling Bank Formation (which contains an interval of Holsteinian age), or correlate with a till within the Fisher Formation, of supposed Saalian age (Gatliff et al., 1994) [[Media:P915280.png|(P915280)]]. Folded and sheared contacts between the shelly deposits, the peat lenses and the Mill of Forest Till indicate that the fossiliferous sediments were glacitectonised during the Main Late Devensian glaciation, when ice from within Strathmore overrode the site from the south-west.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[References, Cainozoic of north-east Scotland|Full reference list]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Grampian Highlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 4. Grampian Highlands]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lmo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>