OR/15/020 Software used and model workflow - Revision history

Dbk at 11:06, 28 July 2015

2015-07-28T11:06:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 28 July 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:

	==Model workflow==		==Model workflow==
	The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Mathers, 2004) The interrogation of the pipeline data with the modelled surfaces was then completed using a series of spatial queries in ArcGIS (for more details see (Price et al., 2008))		The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Mathers, 2004<ref name="Kessler">KESSLER, H, and MATHERS, S. 2004. GSI3D — The software and methodology to build systematic near-surface 3D geological models — Version 1.5. </ref>) The interrogation of the pipeline data with the modelled surfaces was then completed using a series of spatial queries in ArcGIS (for more details see (Price et al., 2008<ref name="Price">PRICE, S J, CROFTS, R G, TERRINGTON, R L, and THORPE, S. 2008. A 3D geological background for Knowsley Industrial Park and surrounding area, NW England. ''Commisioned Report''. </ref>))

	A review of the model by Barron in Feb 2015 prompted further investigation into some small modelling errors that came to light. These included a Site Investigation whose boreholes had been entered into the BGS corporate system using a site datum without being converted to the correct level above Ordnance Datum (SI 44928 – corrected on 9th March 2015 by Sally Stolworthy) and a borehole that looked at odds with the rest of the cross-section (Figure ? below show Knowsley_NS_17 and Knowsley_WE_09).		A review of the model by Barron in Feb 2015 prompted further investigation into some small modelling errors that came to light. These included a Site Investigation whose boreholes had been entered into the BGS corporate system using a site datum without being converted to the correct level above Ordnance Datum (SI 44928 — corrected on 9th March 2015 by Sally Stolworthy) and a borehole that looked at odds with the rest of the cross-section (Figure below show Knowsley_NS_17 and Knowsley_WE_09).

	[[Image:15020 fig3.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|'''Figure 3''' Sections showing erroneous borehole.]]		[[Image:15020 fig3.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|'''Figure 3''' Sections showing erroneous borehole.]]

	As is clear, the borehole in question (SJ49NW1122.) appears to ‘force’ the superficial geology to a higher elevation than the surrounding correlations. Upon investigation it was revealed that this borehole isn’t located in the correct position by at least 1000m. The cross-sections were amended to exclude this false borehole information and this in turn altered the geological envelopes for the Peat_1 (dark brown – but transparency is set to 50% which allows the other units to show through), Shirdley Hill Sand (in dark orange) and the Weathered Sherwood Sandstone (in orange). The original project is shown on the left, and the amendments are shown on the right.		As is clear, the borehole in question (SJ49NW1122.) appears to ‘force’ the superficial geology to a higher elevation than the surrounding correlations. Upon investigation it was revealed that this borehole isn’t located in the correct position by at least 1000m. The cross-sections were amended to exclude this false borehole information and this in turn altered the geological envelopes for the Peat_1 (dark brown — but transparency is set to 50% which allows the other units to show through), Shirdley Hill Sand (in dark orange) and the Weathered Sherwood Sandstone (in orange). The original project is shown on the left, and the amendments are shown on the right.

	[[Image:15020 fig4.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|'''Figure 4''' Corrected sections after removing erroneous borehole.]]		[[Image:15020 fig4.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|'''Figure 4''' Corrected sections after removing erroneous borehole.]]
Line 28:		Line 28:

	[[Image:15020 fig6.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|]]		[[Image:15020 fig6.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|]]

			==References==

	[[category: OR/15/020 Metadata report for the Knowsley 3D geological model \| 05]]		[[category: OR/15/020 Metadata report for the Knowsley 3D geological model \| 05]]

Dbk: Protected "OR/15/020 Software used and model workflow" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

2015-05-05T14:31:00Z

Protected "OR/15/020 Software used and model workflow" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:31, 5 May 2015
(No difference)

Dbk at 12:14, 20 April 2015

2015-04-20T12:14:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 20 April 2015
Line 29:		Line 29:
	[[Image:15020 fig6.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|]]		[[Image:15020 fig6.jpg\|thumb\|center\|500px\|]]

	[[category: OR/15/020 Metadata report for the Knowsley 3D geological model \| 01]]		[[category: OR/15/020 Metadata report for the Knowsley 3D geological model \| 05]]

Dbk: Created page with "notoc {{OR/15/020}} ==Software used== * GSI3D V2.6 * ArcGIS 9.3 * MS Excel ==Model workflow== The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Ma..."

2015-04-20T12:06:50Z

Created page with "__notoc__ {{OR/15/020}} ==Software used== * GSI3D V2.6 * ArcGIS 9.3 * MS Excel ==Model workflow== The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Ma..."

New page

__notoc__
{{OR/15/020}}
==Software used==
* GSI3D V2.6
* ArcGIS 9.3
* MS Excel

==Model workflow==
The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Mathers, 2004) The interrogation of the pipeline data with the modelled surfaces was then completed using a series of spatial queries in ArcGIS (for more details see (Price et al., 2008))

A review of the model by Barron in Feb 2015 prompted further investigation into some small modelling errors that came to light. These included a Site Investigation whose boreholes had been entered into the BGS corporate system using a site datum without being converted to the correct level above Ordnance Datum (SI 44928 – corrected on 9th March 2015 by Sally Stolworthy) and a borehole that looked at odds with the rest of the cross-section (Figure ? below show Knowsley_NS_17 and Knowsley_WE_09).

[[Image:15020 fig3.jpg|thumb|center|500px|'''Figure 3''' Sections showing erroneous borehole.]]

As is clear, the borehole in question (SJ49NW1122.) appears to ‘force’ the superficial geology to a higher elevation than the surrounding correlations. Upon investigation it was revealed that this borehole isn’t located in the correct position by at least 1000m. The cross-sections were amended to exclude this false borehole information and this in turn altered the geological envelopes for the Peat_1 (dark brown – but transparency is set to 50% which allows the other units to show through), Shirdley Hill Sand (in dark orange) and the Weathered Sherwood Sandstone (in orange). The original project is shown on the left, and the amendments are shown on the right.

[[Image:15020 fig4.jpg|thumb|center|500px|'''Figure 4''' Corrected sections after removing erroneous borehole.]]

Cross-section WE_12 also had a borehole at odds with the section. After reviewing the borehole and finding out that the start height had been input into the system incorrectly on loading the borehole appears fit the geology better as shown in the before and after view of the section.

[[Image:15020 fig5.jpg|thumb|center|500px|]]

Some cross-sections show correlation lines that appear to be above the DTM. S Thorpe believes that this is because the original model was produced using a version of GSI3D which didn’t store the DTM. Therefore when the NGM checks were completed a new DTM was introduced which was slightly different (due a more recent flying date). This is unfortunate, but the sections have been modified to represent a better fit to this more recent DTM (derived from the BaldEarth DTM model).

Below is a specific example of the changes made: <u>Knowsley_WE_16</u>

This section shows the MGR line floating above the DTM, the corrective action is shown in the figure labelled 'After'

[[Image:15020 fig6.jpg|thumb|center|500px|]]

[[category: OR/15/020 Metadata report for the Knowsley 3D geological model | 01]]

OR/15/020 Software used and model workflow - Revision history

Dbk at 11:06, 28 July 2015

Dbk: Protected "OR/15/020 Software used and model workflow" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

Dbk at 12:14, 20 April 2015

Dbk: Created page with "__notoc__ {{OR/15/020}} ==Software used== * GSI3D V2.6 * ArcGIS 9.3 * MS Excel ==Model workflow== The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Ma..."

Dbk: Created page with "notoc {{OR/15/020}} ==Software used== * GSI3D V2.6 * ArcGIS 9.3 * MS Excel ==Model workflow== The standard GSI3D workflow was used to create the 3D model. (Kessler and Ma..."