Viewing abuse filter 53: Large deletion from article by new editors

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	53
Description: (publicly viewable)
Conditions:	edit_delta < -5000 & ( new_size >= 50 & ( article_namespace == 0 & ( ! "autoconfirmed" in user_groups & ( length(summary) < 60 & ( ! user_name in article_recent_contributors & ! "#redirect" in lcase(added_lines) & ( ! summary irlike "\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\brv[vt]?\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\brmv?\b\|\brepea?t" & rcount("\n[\|!<]",removed_lines) / (rcount("\n",removed_lines) + 1) < 0.9 & length(rmwhitespace(added_lines)) < 3000 ) ) ) ) ) ) edit_delta < -5000 & ( new_size >= 50 & ( article_namespace == 0 & ( ! "autoconfirmed" in user_groups & ( length(summary) < 60 & ( ! user_name in article_recent_contributors & ! "#redirect" in lcase(added_lines) & ( ! summary irlike "\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\brv[vt]?\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\brmv?\b\|\brepea?t" & rcount("\n[\|!<]",removed_lines) / (rcount("\n",removed_lines) + 1) < 0.9 & length(rmwhitespace(added_lines)) < 3000 ) ) ) ) ) )
Notes:	fixing the part about recent contributor.. <nixeagle> No, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor. Putting that back. Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight Restoring Prodego's edit. - DF Thanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego Changed from "new editor" to "non-autoconfirmed editor" for clarity. -xeno optimizing - Hersfold I increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0 Fixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold exception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen NO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego Increased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik Closed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF Added action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin Clean layout and reduce condition count. -DF
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	10:50, 16 August 2016 by Dbk (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"edit_delta \u003C -5000 \u0026 \r\n( \r\n new_size \u003E= 50 \u0026 \r\n (\r\n article_namespace == 0 \u0026 \r\n (\r\n ! \"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups \u0026 \r\n ( \r\n length(summary) \u003C 60 \u0026 \r\n (\r\n ! user_name in article_recent_contributors \u0026 \r\n ! \"#redirect\" in lcase(added_lines) \u0026 \r\n ( \r\n ! summary irlike \"\\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\\brv[vt]?\\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\\brmv?\\b\|\\brepea?t\" \u0026 \r\n rcount(\"\\n[\|!\u003C]\",removed_lines) / (rcount(\"\\n\",removed_lines) + 1) \u003C 0.9 \u0026 \r\n length(rmwhitespace(added_lines)) \u003C 3000\r\n )\r\n )\r\n )\r\n )\r\n )\r\n)","name":"Large deletion from article by new editors","comments":"fixing the part about recent contributor.. \u003Cnixeagle\u003E\r\n\r\nNo, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor. Putting that back. Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight\r\n\r\nRestoring Prodego's edit. - DF\r\nThanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego\r\n\r\nChanged from \"new editor\" to \"non-autoconfirmed editor\" for clarity. -xeno\r\n\r\noptimizing - Hersfold\r\n\r\nI increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0\r\n\r\nFixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold\r\n\r\nexception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen\r\n\r\nNO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego\r\n\r\nIncreased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik\r\nClosed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF\r\n\r\nAdded action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin\r\n\r\nClean layout and reduce condition count. -DF","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["blanking"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"hidden":false,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["blanking"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning"]}}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Block the user and/or IP address from editing

Block the user and/or IP address from editing their own talk page

Block duration for non-registered users:

Block duration for registered users:

Tag the edit for further review

Tags to apply:

blanking

Viewing abuse filter 53: Large deletion from article by new editors

Navigation menu

Search